An open letter to Mayor Alan Webber, Councilors Renee Villarreal and Signe Lindell, and police Chief Andrew Padilla:

As a rich, Anglo resident living on Hyde Park Road, I may sound like a privileged voice speaking from a high tower segregated from the hustle and bustle of Cerrillos and Harrison roads, where the Interfaith Community Shelter at Pete’s Place has functioned for more than 10 years. But I also am associated with First Presbyterian Church, where some of the services (showers, meals and a clothing center) were provided on a weekly basis after Sunday worship. Holy Faith Episcopal Church provided similar services on other days. Then the city graciously provided about $1 million to renovate Pete’s Place, where the shelter now operates.

I and my wife, Mary Ann Lundy, have volunteered at the Interfaith Community Shelter. I was both a shower provider, nighttime bedding services provider, and Mary Ann served in the kitchen. Needless to say, the pandemic prevented us (me 91, Mary Ann 87) from continuing as volunteers.

My purpose in addressing community leaders, two of whom I voted for and Villarreal, whom I worked with in Pojoaque on community issues, is to remind you of your overall responsibilities to the city community. Residents on Harrison Road should have a voice for you to hear. But the homeless, who are practically voiceless, also must be your concern. I do not infer that you disregard the homeless. In fact, each of your statements in the newspaper (“Neighbors of Santa Fe shelter demand more policing,” Oct. 6) demonstrate a concern for their needs.

My concern, however, is the oft-repeated solution, which is not a viable plan, to “move it” and build or provide a larger space somewhere else. Santa Fe is a prominent NIMBY city. Witness past efforts to have a senior living complex near Museum Hill or the affordable housing complex not far from Harrison Road, extending Richards Avenue, da da da da. The above-mentioned article in The New Mexican quotes a neighbor saying this NIMBY problem should not stop moving proposals, but his own neighborhood illustrates they are party to NIMBY-ism. So solutions are floated about a shelter in the vicinity of the airport, an utterly preposterous location for serving homeless in the city.

Rather, city leaders should propose viable solutions. The increased lighting on Harrison Street is a meaningful first step. Increased and prompt police presence and response is another. Chief Padilla, as a north-side resident, I have observed almost daily a police car sitting in the median at Paseo de Peralta and Guadalupe Street, watching for, I presume, speeding or red-light running. On lower Gonzales Road, there is frequently a police car stationed to catch or moderate speeding. Sure, your department has pressing emergencies, but these idle, lurking police cars might also observe the shelter area as well. Mayor Webber, your suggestion that augmented social services are needed, rather than police crackdowns, is commendable. Your efforts during the pandemic to use the midtown campus for homeless housing and plans to purchase a motel for the same purpose also are commendable.

Finally, the article refers to the county jail’s refusal to accept more inmates as aggravating the homeless problem. Shelter Director Joe Jordan-Berenis states there are only 10 or 15 people — all banned from the shelter — causing the problems about which the neighborhood is complaining. Blaming or moving the shelter, which provides enormous one-stop services to the Santa Fe homeless in a central location, is not a solution. I remind you as city leaders of your obligation to serve all citizens of our city.

Donald Wilson has been a resident of Santa Fe and its environs since 1999. He has been proud of its multicultural spirit and frequent examples of civic cooperation.

(2) comments

Frederick Jones

Mr Wilson, in communicating with the reporter I did state it is a NIMBY problem. But I also stated it's been an IMBY problem for me and my family (families) for ten years. Ten years has passed and the dirt road I grew up on is now something totally different. I've put up with this place for ten years. With no solution for ten years. It makes me think there never has been a worry for a solution. It's time to move it to a strategically picked area. Not in the middle of nowhere. But it's a NIMBY issue again? With all that Pete's does in your volunteers role, the road has been totally neglected. Ten years of neglect or a yearly nuisance that changes each year as the addiction/ homeless issue morphs into something different. The city graciously provides a million dollars and ten years pass and the road gets 172,000 dollars for lighting. No sidewalks, no speed bumps to slow the freeway bypass created by the last administration. Then the rotary club builds an awening that doesn't get used much. All while the party roars outside an ill equiped entry. I have been dumfounded as to why there is such an attachment to this poorly thought out facility. It is all our jobs to help the addicted/homeless but you and other volunteers have the convenience to go back to your homes.

Tee Iseminger

Thanks, Donald, for using your voice of privilege to advocate for those who don't have one, and for calling out NIMBY-ism in a city that has such potential for greatness, but can't get out of its own way to make even "goodness" accessible to all.

Welcome to the discussion.

Thank you for joining the conversation on Please familiarize yourself with the community guidelines. Avoid personal attacks: Lively, vigorous conversation is welcomed and encouraged, insults, name-calling and other personal attacks are not. No commercial peddling: Promotions of commercial goods and services are inappropriate to the purposes of this forum and can be removed. Respect copyrights: Post citations to sources appropriate to support your arguments, but refrain from posting entire copyrighted pieces. Be yourself: Accounts suspected of using fake identities can be removed from the forum.