Trust is essential for society’s institutions — especially government — to function, yet it’s in short supply today.

Consider the ongoing pandemic, where the people of the United States remain skeptical about pronouncements from their government. It does not help the situation when the latest guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are difficult to follow and, seemingly, make little sense.

From 10 days isolation for people infected with coronavirus, we are down to a five-day recommendation, with advice for folks to keep the masks on after leaving isolation for at least another five days. There’s no advice to take a COVID-19 test to make sure the virus is gone, either.

It’s clear there is recognition that the fast-spread omicron variant could bring society to a halt. So many people are infected that 10 days off work or out of school could mean shutting schools, not having hospital workers or other essential employees. There was little discussion of the balancing factors, however, as the CDC released the new recommendations. Tests are in short supply, too. Requiring tests for people to leave isolation might be a difficult hurdle to climb because of the shortage.

Guidelines throughout the pandemic have been a balancing act — using the latest scientific research to protect public safety while at the same time, issuing recommendations people will follow. As one Atlantic article pointed out, “Briefer isolations, if managed safely, could help keep the country afloat.” Explaining this openly could help restore trust in the battered CDC.

That openness is a failing of governments from the federal government down to the local level.

In New Mexico, we have seen state government successfully sued over its failure to provide an adequate education to certain at-risk students in the Yazzie-Martinez lawsuit. Now, the Public Education Department is failing to deliver enough information about what progress it has made in addressing the District Court’s findings. The state is also late with its comprehensive plan designed to address Yazzie-Martinez concerns.

Rather than fight requests for information, this is a time for New Mexico to be as open as possible. Put material online, available to one and all, so that plaintiffs can track progress without even having to make requests for information. The only way to show compliance is to open up.

It’s not just about placing documents where individuals can find them, either.

Sometimes government officials fail constituents when they decline to answer questions or funnel information. Many agencies — both at the state and local levels — want questions to be screened by public information officers. Police departments are notorious for declining to answer questions. There’s always a reason. The case is under investigation. It’s a personnel issue. The result is that citizens are left in the dark.

Our own Santa Fe Public Schools Board of Education has adopted a “norm” through which public pronouncements go through the president of the board only. Other board members don’t speak, meaning constituents don’t know what they think. Taxpayers are denied a vigorous public discussion outside of meetings and elected officials don’t have to answer constituent questions publicly. It’s no way to do business.

Shutting down discussions, failing to explain decisions, keeping public information private — all of those are ways the government lets citizens down. Transparency, on the other hand, increases trust. More institutions should try it.

(3) comments

Chris Mechels

The New Mexican mouths platitudes, but is part of the problem, as they won't write critically of the "scofflaw" attitude by MLG and AG Balderas concerning the publics right to know. Balderas meets his "responsibility" to open records by running "training sessions" for the public and govt agencies. He WILL NOT enforce against the offenders, in fact if I launch a lawsuit under IPRA (public records) or OMA (open meetings) laws, the AG will show up to DEFEND the "perps". How's THAT for being two faced; "trains" us to our rights, then defends those who offend. MLG "could" insist that her Departments abide by the law, but does not, with the result that her administration commonly violates; IPRA, OMA and the NM Rules Act, and just dares us to sue them, and the AG will defend her.

The New Mexican writes about NONE of this of course, because they are part of the problem, not the solution. The solution; fire MLG and Balderas, and elect a Governor and AG who will enforce the laws. But, I'm dreaming right??? This IS New Mexico... and the last Governor who believed in openness was Johnson.

Jim Montevallo

Why then in the holy name of Saint Francis of Assisi would you endorse Al Webber?

How easy it is pen pleasant platitudes to the people and play politics behind the scenes, but oh what a tangled web we weave.

Mike Johnson

[thumbup] Well said, and not just him, but most every politician who they cite in this otherwise good review of the failings of NM government.

Welcome to the discussion.

Thank you for joining the conversation on Please familiarize yourself with the community guidelines. Avoid personal attacks: Lively, vigorous conversation is welcomed and encouraged, insults, name-calling and other personal attacks are not. No commercial peddling: Promotions of commercial goods and services are inappropriate to the purposes of this forum and can be removed. Respect copyrights: Post citations to sources appropriate to support your arguments, but refrain from posting entire copyrighted pieces. Be yourself: Accounts suspected of using fake identities can be removed from the forum.