An era in education could be ending — perhaps.

President Barack Obama told the country last week that educational testing had gone too far — and recommended that students only spend about 2 percent of classroom time taking a standardized test. As with most recommendations coming from Washington, there’s even an acronym for the recommendation: TAP or Testing Action Plan.

As The New York Times reported, “the administration’s move seemed a reckoning on a two-decade push that began during the Bush administration and intensified under President Obama. Programs with aspirational names — No Child Left Behind, Race to the Top — were responding to swelling agreement among Democrats and Republicans that higher expectations and accountability could lift the performance of American students, who chronically lag their peers in other countries on international measures, and could help close a chronic achievement gap between black and white students.”

Despite the best intentions, improvement has not always occurred and the achievement gap seems as intractable as ever. What has happened — just listen to the voices of children and parents and teachers — is that the school day has become more regimented and less interesting, and learning has been centered on what will be on the tests.

As education expert Robert Pondisco writes in U.S. News and World Report: “When parents complain, rightfully so, about over-testing, what they are almost certainly responding to is not the tests themselves, which take up a vanishingly small amount of class time, but the effects of test-and-prep culture, which has fundamentally changed the experience of schooling for our children, and not always for the better.”

A senior fellow and vice president for external affairs at the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, Pondisco writes and speaks extensively on education and reform. He gets at the crux of the testing dilemma: “It’s all well and good to ‘encourage’ states, districts and schools to limit testing, but as long as test-driven accountability measures, which are driven substantially by federal law, are used not to provide feedback to parents and other stakeholders but to trigger corrective measures in schools, it won’t matter if children take two tests or 2000; the effects will be the same.”

Tests will take over the classroom, in other words.

Yet measures of achievement, whether the reading skills of fourth-graders or the math proficiency of high school students, remain less than inspiring, especially when compared to other industrialized nations. Graduation rates are getting better, though, with the U.S. rate at 81 percent, an all-time high. Still, New Mexico was one of five states that saw a decline in graduation rates last year, down to 75.6 percent. We continue to struggle.

Locally, Santa Fe Public Schools Superintendent Joel Boyd told the Board of Education earlier this week that our students already are following the president’s recommendation of keeping testing to about 2 percent of classroom time.

We’d argue, as we have before, that simply measuring the time spent taking the test does not account for how the tests are actually delivered. From practice test-taking, to too many teachers focusing on the tests as the end goal, to the makeup tests that also can interrupt class time, the impact of standardized testing is bigger than just a few days a year.

No one should be calling for no standards or for no test taking. It’s important to measure student success and progress. Yet taking that measure should not become the way to penalize teachers or stigmatize schools.

If, as a nation, we are saying goodbye to this culture of labeling students, schools and their teachers as failures because of tests, President Obama’s speech could be seen as a turning point. We can move from No Child Left Behind to Common CoreState Standards to PARCC — Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers — to finally, Testing in its Place. That would be a good day in education.

(5) comments

Cynthia Allen

"No one should be calling for no standards or for no test taking."
Really? Why not call for no test taking and let the professional teachers design the standards? Let me remind everyone that the sought after, highly expensive, private schools across the country and where the Gates and Obama children attend school do not have to worry about standardized test or Common Core. They receive a personalized, enriching education with small class sizes where teachers are respected as professionals to actually assess the children in their classes. So why do our Public School children have to receive a totally different kind of education? Are Public School teachers not professionals? Are Public School children not good enough to receive an enriching, quality, individualized education?
"It’s important to measure student success and progress."
Yes, I agree it is important to measure student success and progress, but as individual students and by the teachers own measurements and assessments. I actually trust my children's teachers to be the professionals they were hired to be and after spending day in and day out with my children, I trust them to know if they are ready for the next grade level.
Wake up Parents!! Opt Out of all Standardized Tests!!

Cate Moses

"Tests will take over the classroom." The New Mexican is a bit out of touch here. They already have. Obama's ridiculous 2% proclamation is too little too late. It is an attempt to silence the tide of opposition to high stakes testing and the privatization of public schools and demonization of teachers that passes for education "reform." Obama has made a little squeak. Meanwhile, his department of education--and our own in New Mexico--continue the madness of test-driven curriculum and teacher evaluation.

Many do not realize just how bad education reform in New Mexico has been for our schools and children. We are one of only a handful of states that still labors under the non-educator created Common Core and CCRAP test.

The time for talk is long gone. Under Scamdera's reign, NM's graduation rates continue to fall--because she tests our kids to death and changes the graduation requirements constantly. In almost every other US state, graduation rates are going up.

If you have a child in public schools, opt out of all high stakes tests now!

Don Duke

More money for education. That will fix it. Afterall """"""""" (insert your states name here)
is 49th in education funding. This message brought to you by the. teachers union.

Steve Salazar

A realistic view: You can't take the word of a teacher, who's job depends on children passing a class, to be honest about whether or not a student learned the material in the class. You need to test them.

Pierce Knolls

"...a two-decade push that began during the Bush administration and intensified under President Obama."

No, no, no, it's all Skandera's fault.

Welcome to the discussion.

Thank you for joining the conversation on Please familiarize yourself with the community guidelines. Avoid personal attacks: Lively, vigorous conversation is welcomed and encouraged, insults, name-calling and other personal attacks are not. No commercial peddling: Promotions of commercial goods and services are inappropriate to the purposes of this forum and can be removed. Respect copyrights: Post citations to sources appropriate to support your arguments, but refrain from posting entire copyrighted pieces. Be yourself: Accounts suspected of using fake identities can be removed from the forum.