It should not take a lawsuit for the Santa Fe County Sheriff’s Office, led by Sheriff Robert Garcia, to do the right thing and release the full report on an incident involving two married Santa Fe Police Department officers.

The issue of what records must be released already has been litigated, with law enforcement — in this case, the state Department of Public Safety — being told in no uncertain terms that such records are public. Agencies must make “original records of entry” available for inspection “without any redaction, omission or claim of exemption,” according to the settlement agreement.

Yet Garcia wants to keep parts of the record out of sight. The sheriff’s office also isn’t releasing lapel camera or dashboard camera video of the incident, pending review by county attorneys. That review needs to be completed and the records released. It doesn’t take days to watch a video and review case law, especially when the settlement language is clear.

Here’s what the settlement calls for — “DPS shall treat 911 tapes, 911 transcripts, initial incident reports, initial offense reports, accident and traffic offense reports, radio tapes, dispatch tapes, radio logs, mug shots and CAD printouts as ‘original records of entry’ as defined by the New Mexico Arrest Record Information Act.”

Further, “DPS shall make all such ‘original records of entry’ as set forth in Paragraph 5 available for inspection and copying on or before the deadlines imposed by [the Inspection of Public Records Act] without any redaction, omission or claim of exemption.”

The Halloween night incident, embarrassing as it was, already has been written about. The officers involved were identified through other sources. According to the incident report, police were sent to the Allsup’s, 2640 Agua Fría St., after a convenience clerk heard yelling outside (the sheriff’s office then was called in because the couple involved were city cops). Lt. Andrea Dobyns and Officer Joe Baca — who have since resigned — were identified as the couple arguing. They were off-duty at the time, and had stopped by Allsup’s with an unidentified woman who wanted to buy cigarettes. The three evidently had been celebrating Halloween at a bar.

There is no reason for the names of people involved to be redacted. Susan Boe, executive director of the New Mexico Foundation for Open Government, told reporter Daniel J. Chacón that, “If they’re named in the original record of entry, then it has to be given up.”

As Chacón reported, Attorney General Hector Balderas’ Inspection of Public Records Act compliance guide further states that the law requires public access to “virtually all public records.” Legitimate exceptions include “law enforcement records that reveal confidential sources, methods, information or individuals accused but not charged with a crime.”

It’s the latter loophole to which Garcia appears to be clinging, saying he cannot “put out someone’s name” who hasn’t been charged with a crime. However, his agency and other law enforcement offices do that all the time when releasing initial incident reports. The exception might work if Dobyns or Baca had been accused of a crime, but not charged, and an investigation was continuing. That’s not the case here.

What it looks like is one officer doing another a favor, hiding details to avoid embarrassment. Garcia’s actions make it appear that there’s plenty to hide, even if there isn’t. Perhaps the videos are particularly revealing — people who have been drinking often say and do the darndest things. Or perhaps they’re not revealing at all. By not simply adhering to the well-established public records law, Garcia is creating mystery and speculation where none might be necessary. What was likely a one-day story is stretched over several days, all because the sheriff is holding back.

Stop covering up, and release the records as the law requires. After all, even sheriffs — especially sheriffs — should follow the law.

Show what you're thinking about this story

You must be logged in to react.
Click any reaction to login.
0
0
0
0
0

(6) comments

Khal Spencer

The bottom line is follow the law and in that issue, I agree with the editorial. The present situation, where information is redacted and people imagine their own lurid details to fill in the blanks, does no good either to public integrity or to the two (or however many) cops who stepped deeply into the brown stuff after a long night of volatile organic solvent abuse. Just do the right thing and let this fizzle itself out. This has become a tempest in a teapot.

Steve Salazar

A definition of insanity, voting for the democrat and expecting to not have to sue for public information.

Martin Garcia

What this boils down to is a witch hunt by the Santa Fe New Mexican. This kind of shoddy reporting only makes Santa Fe anti-police. There was no crime to report therefore there is no report to see. Duh

Jimmy Green

As far as I know, the two cops involved were not "elected officials".

Jimmy Green

What part of "no actual crime was committed" is the paper not understanding?

Francisco Carbajal

I totally agree with the entire editorial on this subject matter. Yet, the general public have a legal right to inspect public records that an elected official does not have any constitutional muster to enforce by keeping it away from the public view. This type of scenario also exhibits on how many times the Santa Fe County Attorney and Sheriff Robert Garcia have been sued in the past for various violations of law and the taxpayer's paying the price for their lack of expertise in terms of understanding the basic simple legal definitions and case law on this subject matter (NM Public Inspection Records Law). Shame on both of them! Get rid of both of them.[thumbdown]

Welcome to the discussion.

Thank you for joining the conversation on Santafenewmexican.com. Please familiarize yourself with the community guidelines. Avoid personal attacks: Lively, vigorous conversation is welcomed and encouraged, insults, name-calling and other personal attacks are not. No commercial peddling: Promotions of commercial goods and services are inappropriate to the purposes of this forum and can be removed. Respect copyrights: Post citations to sources appropriate to support your arguments, but refrain from posting entire copyrighted pieces. Be yourself: Accounts suspected of using fake identities can be removed from the forum.