When the proposed Thrive Community Charter School was being presented to state officials and the community of Santa Fe, one of its more enthusiastic supporters was a homebuilder.

The executive director of Homewise, which builds affordable housing, wrote in support of the K-8 charter. Mike Loftin argued in a letter to the editor, “There is a clearly a need for more classrooms on the Southside.” Not mentioned in the letter was a possible location for the new school — in a proposed Homewise development.

To date, none of the school’s supporters have explained how a charter school — required by law to admit students by random lottery — can be set up so students come from areas where schools are overcrowded, thus easing the pressure.

The proposed school just received authorization from the New Mexico Public Education Commission and is shooting for a fall 2022 opening.

First, it will need to find a location, at least temporarily. The promised south-side address — whether in the Homewise subdivision or elsewhere — is a few years away.

We opposed the new charter, pointing out the many different sorts of schools already established through Santa Fe Public Schools that offer parents choices and variety.

Santa Fe has elementary schools with preschool offerings through fifth or sixth grades; middle schools that encompass various grade levels from sixth through eighth; K-8 schools; online education; two traditional high schools; an alternative high school; and even a 7-12 magnet school that offers international baccalaureate programs.

Additionally, Santa Fe can boast a charter elementary school that will be adding middle school grades and several other 7-12 charter schools, organized under both the state and the local district.

Each of those schools is a public school. The construction, maintenance and upkeep for these schools is rightly the responsibility of taxpayers.

This is nothing unique to Santa Fe. State-sponsored charter schools, district charter schools and traditional public schools all deserve support. At some point, though, state leaders need to ask whether spreading capital outlay dollars to build more schools and maintain more buildings is the best use of scarce state funds.

Each school is approved on its merits, one at a time. The Public Education Department and the Public Education Commission need to consider these applications in a broader context. It’s not just paying for buildings. It’s paying salaries for all the adults attached to these schools, including the all-important teaching staff. But there are other adults receiving paychecks. District charters share financial expertise at the local level, but each state charter does its own books — they essentially operate as mini-school districts, but pulling from the same funding as traditional public schools. They also threaten to dilute an already-thin pool of teachers.

And come 2022, Santa Fe will have another such mini-district if Thrive opens as planned. At some point, it will dedicate a new school building (or better yet, move into an empty school building to better use tax dollars).

That could be somewhere on the south side. Homewise clearly wants the school in its proposed subdivision, although students won’t be walking to school from the affordable housing development, at least not many of them. That’s not how charters work. Students are determined by who wins the lottery.

Those details remain to be worked out. First, the development needs to be approved, and that’s not a done deal.

Santa Fe County neighbors are upset that what they see as necessary open space is going to become housing. They’re fighting the project.

They once were promised a park. Another objection is to another school — there are three in the immediate area. Because the land has been annexed by the city, approval eventually will be up to the Planning Commission and City Council.

The Early Neighborhood Notification Process — as it is designed to do — is raising a number of questions. We encourage builders and others to ask Santa Fe Public Schools what it would need if 96 or more homes are being built, especially if nearby schools are at capacity. Maybe this development, if built, needs a neighborhood school rather than a charter that can turn students away who live next door.

Affordable housing is desirable. Building on open spaces in existing neighborhoods means less sprawl. But losing a green space might be too great a sacrifice for neighbors. These are early days. Pay attention, ask questions and look for common ground.

(8) comments

Devin Bent

The county bought these 22 acres using our tax money intending it for a park. (We voted for that bond and paid it off with our tax payments.) People moved in nearby thinking it would be a park or at least open space. Now the city seems to intend it for housing (half of it affordable), a charter school, and a park 1/10 the size of what was promised.

Why does all affordable housing seem to be built on the south side? The city has 18 acres at the old, unused St. Catherine Indian School that it has no plans. Why not use those 18 acres for affordable housing and a charter school if we need one? And the 22 acres on the south side would remain as open space. Why not? https://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/local_news/santa-fe-civic-housing-authority-ponders-future-of-school-site/article_a9e8ab8e-1d6e-11ec-8795-676ec8836a28.html

Jitty Bap

If you wouldn’t build over Las Acequias or SWAN, don’t build over this park. It looks different than other parks but it is no less an incredibly needed public resource in this scrappy little corner of Santa Fe.

Ellen Stone

South Meadows Field was paid for as part of the $20,000,000 Santa Fe County Bond 2000-114 to be protected open space for recreational purposes. The article mentioned that a park was promised for this land. More accurately, the land has already been purchased, protected, and utilized by residents for over 20 years as a naturalized recreational space.

Lupe Molina

I'm sympathetic to the cause but there seems to be a discrepancy here. It's owned by the county. So how do you mean it was purchased by residents?

Ellen Stone

I understand how clarification could be helpful.

What I meant was: residents voted and passed the bond that paid for this land to be used as recreational space. Residents "purchased" it by voting to pass the $20,000,000 bond. Part of that bond money paid for the field. (Other land was also purchased by the bond.)

Stefanie Beninato

Why would the public schools allow another charter school when it does not have enough teachers for the current schools? Is the new school superintendent going to use "paid volunteers" from the city workforce to fill these new positions?

Sloan Cunningham

Excellent point. And why would another school be approved when enrollment across the city is down year after year now?

LeRoy Sanchez

Also, a lottery controlled charter school doesn’t fill the needs of that community where most of the children live.

Welcome to the discussion.

Thank you for joining the conversation on Santafenewmexican.com. Please familiarize yourself with the community guidelines. Avoid personal attacks: Lively, vigorous conversation is welcomed and encouraged, insults, name-calling and other personal attacks are not. No commercial peddling: Promotions of commercial goods and services are inappropriate to the purposes of this forum and can be removed. Respect copyrights: Post citations to sources appropriate to support your arguments, but refrain from posting entire copyrighted pieces. Be yourself: Accounts suspected of using fake identities can be removed from the forum.