“Hope springs eternal in the human breast,” said Alexander Pope in 1733.

If Pope were around today following the machinations of the midtown campus development, his optimism would be misplaced.

Still, every new entity brought on to “help” our dreams for midtown brings forward fresh enthusiasm and hope. It is touching to see but ultimately frustrating for long-term watchers. And so it is today with folks from the University of New Mexico’s School of Architecture and Planning and the Bay Area design firm Opticos.

They are facilitating a new round of listening and community engagement to see if anything has changed since we were listened and engaged in 2018. Having been engaged and heard this past Wednesday in a one-hour, small-group format at the Santa Fe Community Convention Center, not much has changed. Except patience.

That is gone, at least for me.

Earnest newcomers build on optimism from the city’s purchase of the campus in 2009, which led to optimism by the Santa Fe University of Art and Design, which failed in 2017. Then optimistic Bay Area transplant Matt Brown was hired to run the Office of Economic Development and inherited the challenge.

Brown’s background was an entrepreneur in gaming. He devised a “fun” engagement process that led to a handful of local design firms offering visions. The public was invited to put colorful stickers on them to show support. That led to the official adoption of the 2018 “vision” by the City Council.

Then Matt Brown left and was replaced by another Bay Area transplant, Rich Brown, who brought in another Bay Area expert, Daniel Hernandez, to oversee a curious process called a Request for Expressions of Interest. Teams coalesced to express interest, and seven potential master developers submitted hopeful proposals.



One group was selected for serious negotiations but fled after realizing it was buying a pig in a poke. In so many words, the group said the city should pay it to take the thing off Santa Fe’s hands. Decrepit infrastructure, old buildings, onerous civic engagement and no real offer of any financial help led to “thanks, but no thanks.”

Now the city has decided it can be its own master developer. News flash: No, it can’t. There is history on how it could be done. The city bought vast acreages on the south side in the early 1990s and then also the Railyard area.

Both were successfully developed, but not by the city. Instead, nonprofit corporations were established with real developers with real development experience to run the shows. Not planners and visionaries; hard-nosed developers. It kept city politics at arm’s length.

Both developments survived five different mayoral administrations. The current impetus for midtown development could be over after the Nov. 2 city election and we’d be back to square one. Again.

The Opticus people are designers, planners and architects. Their presence implies they have been engaged to carve up tracts, figure out roads and access points, and divvy up spaces to satisfy the broad menu of community desires.

Meanwhile, the city has still not executed the land swap with the state that former city asset manager Matt O’Reilly negotiated, nor come to an agreement with the U.S. Forest Service on its land adjacent to the campus. Both parcels block connectivity to Franklin E. Miles Park and Camino Carlos Rey. Without those properties under city control, master planning is futile.

A more fitting Pope quote would be: “A man should never be ashamed to own that he has been in the wrong, which is but saying in other words the he is wiser today than he was yesterday.”

Kim Shanahan has been a

Santa Fe green builder since 1986 and a sustainability consultant since 2019. Contact him at shanafe@aol.com.

(8) comments

Juana Lemus

Is there not a city planner out there that sees the potential of this property?

Yes, the city has left it to rot. Opening the door for it to become a money driven let’s knock it down, cut it up and put as many poorly made apartments on it, pay off the city to avoid that nasty affordable housing clause. We lose.

Does no one else see the possibility of a permaculture, multigenerational, multi use land project? Living, working together, building a community we all talk about wanting?

I suppose there is not enough money in that idea….

Stefanie Beninato

Yes and the so-called listening sessions were supposed to be from 9-4 Wed and TH. Without any notice, the listening session ended at noon on TH--I saw a list with other peoples' names who had signed up to speak. I was there--no note on the door etc.

And yes, why don't we have qualified New Mexicans for this project? And Carol Johnson, head of land use, also spent time in the Bay Area. She left and now we have the second interim director because the first one who was the assistant (Eli Issacson) left for the sunny climes of California.

And the campus is a mess. Sam Burnett the project manager there. If his track record is any indicator we are in trouble. Burnett "managed" the renovation of the women's room and family room at Ft Marcy. There never is adequate hot water in the family room. And the city has yet to put hair dryers in the women's locker room at Ft Marcy--2.5 years after it reopened. The women's locker room at Perez had no hooks, no mobility bars and no hair dryers just this week...Anything the city touches--no matter who is mayor--becomes a disaster. Remember David Coss was the one who pushed this purchase because of the pressure from Big Bill and Coss's own political hopes.

David Romero

Nothing is going to happen with Webber in charge anyway. He's too busy worrying about removing monuments and using city resources towards his campaign.

Dan Frazier

There is an editorial elsewhere in today's New Mexican about the homeless problem, and how the current shelters are inadequate. Why not dedicate this abandoned campus, or at least part of it, to housing and caring for the homeless?

Khal Spencer

This continues to be a train wreck, and the public continues to pay for more trains to wreck. We need to get the city and its politics out of this.

Emily Koyama

I was just reading a fifferent article about a "bay area transplant" running CYFD (and we know what a mess that agency is).

What is it with all these "transplants" running our State?

Are there so few qualified New Mexicans?

Richard Reinders

As I have said before cut the project up into manageable chunks and bring in several developers minimizing the risk.

Anita McGinnis

[thumbup][thumbup]

Welcome to the discussion.

Thank you for joining the conversation on Santafenewmexican.com. Please familiarize yourself with the community guidelines. Avoid personal attacks: Lively, vigorous conversation is welcomed and encouraged, insults, name-calling and other personal attacks are not. No commercial peddling: Promotions of commercial goods and services are inappropriate to the purposes of this forum and can be removed. Respect copyrights: Post citations to sources appropriate to support your arguments, but refrain from posting entire copyrighted pieces. Be yourself: Accounts suspected of using fake identities can be removed from the forum.