The state Public Regulation Commission turned down a power storage proposal Wednesday by two heavyweights — Facebook and Public Service Company of New Mexico — and told them to work out a different plan.

The five-member commission unanimously agreed Facebook and PNM must make another run at an agreement that would help the social media giant expand its already big data-center operation in Los Lunas. A couple of commissioners said the proposal was so complicated it seemed intentionally deceptive, and some raised concerns it would lead to higher costs for other PNM customers.

Two PNM executives said in an interview Wednesday evening this was far from the case. “While it’s complicated, it’s all transparent,” said Ron Darnell, senior vice president.

Vice President Tom Fallgren said other customers will not get stuck paying for the deal. “I think we’ve clearly demonstrated no adverse impact on the other retail customers,” he said.

In sometimes blunt language, Public Regulation Commission members said PNM’s plan to grant Facebook more storage space for electricity in a major expansion generally didn’t make sense.

They said they appreciated the economic development provided to New Mexico by Facebook’s data center but couldn’t support a plan that might call for other customers to pay higher costs. The project involved Facebook subsidiary Greater Kudu.

Asked for comment, a Facebook spokeswoman wrote in an email: “We have submitted the appropriate approvals to allow for the possibility of expansion, but we do not have anything further to share.”

As described by commissioners and documents, PNM would supply electricity through solar sources for Facebook’s expansion project. The main sticking point was a plan for power storage.

The commission said its understanding of the proposal was that Facebook would pay PNM for batteries but would then be rewarded for using more and more of the stored electricity. Ultimately, the commission said, it was likely other ratepayers would get stuck with the bill while Facebook enjoyed incentives to use more stored energy.

The commissioners asked the companies to work out a simpler contract that wouldn’t have the potential to affect regular customers.

They also complained the proposal offered was convoluted. Commission Chairman Stephen Fischmann of Las Cruces called it “confusing, tangled and quite frankly it felt to me like it was an intentional effort to mislead.”

Commissioner Cynthia Hall of Albuquerque called the plan “unfortunately flawed” and too risky to PNM’s other customers.

Commissioner Joseph Maestas of Santa Fe said while the Facebook plant in Los Lunas “has a lot of momentum,” this particular proposal raises questions about fairness to ratepayers.

Fallgren said the commissioners had notions about Facebook getting “credits” for use of stored energy. Facebook will pay about $7.9 million a year for a long row of large batteries that will serve as storage, he said.

“They are not getting a credit” for use, he added.

After the $7.9 million annual payout for the storage, Fallgren said, there will be no additional payouts or credits for that part of the project.

(9) comments

Bruce Taylor

Having read this piece carefully, and knowing of other similar very large cloud hyperscale data center developments that have worked out similar arrangements, this strikes me as New Mexico's PRC as being woefully dimwitted on renewable energy storage and distribution. There is no "there" there, either implied of suggested. If the PRC is going to act in such cases, it clearly needs to come to the table having sought and received independent due diligence, including what has already been done elsewhere so that they understand the project in question. This ruling indicates that they lack the technical sophistication to understand, and quite likely the economic justification either. Very disappointing lurch backwards. And renewable energy storage, b-t-w, is very much in the purview of PNM and its merger with Avangrid. Another case where Avangrid's experience and expertise make an enormous difference to New Mexico's regenerative energy future.

Richard Reinders

They are not the only experienced renewable energy company, I would seek alternatives to this bad deal.

Mike Johnson

If you look at Mr. Taylor's previous posts you will note a common theme of defending PNM and Avangrid, most likely a troll using this site to promote them.

Richard Reinders

Thanks for the call out

Philip Taccetta

Why is FB worried about PNM? They have a gazillion square feet of roof that could be covered with PV’s. They can certainly afford that as well as a huge battery bank. They should stay as far away from PNM/Avengrid as possible!

Mike Johnson

There is something rotten here, with companies like Facebook and PNM/Avangrid (Spanish parent company being investigated for criminal activity:https://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/local_news/british-media-reports-iberdrola-executives-being-investigated/article_b5ed81b4-d45f-11eb-8b81-2339b821c451.html) you can't trust either, and when they conspire to make things too complicated to understand, you know what that is for.

Bruce Taylor

You will find that there is nothing "rotten" here if you read carefully. Iberdola's CEO and top executives have voluntarily offered their availability for investigation and interviews. Let's allow the investigation to go forward. At this point it is little more than procedural.

Richard Reinders

PNM said they were transparent , just like the Avangrid deal? PNM should be watch as much as Avangrid they are birds of a feather.

Bruce Taylor

Having lived in a state that is the great beneficiary of Iberdola/Avangrid's acquisition of its PNM-like primary power utility, I find this notion of "transparency" to be ludicrous.

Welcome to the discussion.

Thank you for joining the conversation on Santafenewmexican.com. Please familiarize yourself with the community guidelines. Avoid personal attacks: Lively, vigorous conversation is welcomed and encouraged, insults, name-calling and other personal attacks are not. No commercial peddling: Promotions of commercial goods and services are inappropriate to the purposes of this forum and can be removed. Respect copyrights: Post citations to sources appropriate to support your arguments, but refrain from posting entire copyrighted pieces. Be yourself: Accounts suspected of using fake identities can be removed from the forum.