Until this week, state Rep. Cathrynn Brown was best known for sponsoring a bill that would have made it a crime for victims of rape or incest to have an abortion.

Brown’s proposal said this: “Tampering with evidence shall include procuring or facilitating an abortion, or coercing another to obtain an abortion of a fetus that is the result of criminal sexual penetration or incest with the intent to destroy evidence of the crime.”

Critics from around the country pummeled Brown, R-Carlsbad. They said she wanted to prosecute and incarcerate women who had been raped.

Brown, an attorney, blamed the bill drafters for the messy legislation carrying her name. That’s an old trick.

She also told me she didn’t practice criminal law, as though a legislator had to be F. Lee Bailey to understand she couldn’t force women to bear the children of their attackers.

Brown scrambled to rewrite her bill. She said her focus was on rapists who force their victims to have an abortion. All she wanted to do was help victims of a terrible crime, not turn them into convicted felons.

Almost eight years have gone by since Brown’s fiasco. She scarcely rated a mention in news columns until this week.

Now Brown is back with another time-wasting bill that’s not worth the paper it would be printed on.

Brown says she will introduce a bill to decertify New Mexico’s electoral vote for President-elect Joe Biden.

“All legislators have a duty to act when serious and substantial irregularities occur in an election, resulting in vote counts that cannot be trusted,” Brown said in a statement.

Like defeated President Donald Trump, Brown wants to spread the myth that the 2020 election was corrupt. In her alternate reality, New Mexico residents don’t believe Biden won.

Without any proof to offer, Brown is left to follow Trump’s lead. She makes a point of being imprecise.

More than two months after the election, Trump says fraud enabled Biden to steal votes using dead people and dishonest poll workers. Brown and other followers of Trump repeat his claims. But where’s the evidence?

Trump didn’t have it when he harangued Georgia election officials for an hour in hopes of intimidating them into reversing his loss in that state. His error-filled, tape-recorded monologue revealed a sore loser bent on cheating his way to a second term.

Brown wants to continue the baseless claim that Trump lost unfairly by memorializing her stand in legislation.

“A pattern of premeditated fraud has been seen in a number of states,” Brown said.

Seen by whom? In what states? Who were the culprits, and why doesn’t she name them?

Like the Trump clan and its laughable lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, Brown is full of generalities or something worse.

Brown extends her unfounded charges to a place dominated by the rival party.

“In New Mexico, we have examples of foul play over multiple elections, specifically in Doña Ana County,” she said. “I can tell you that New Mexicans are contacting lawmakers in record numbers and asking us to address the fraud.”

As is her habit, Brown didn’t cite any particulars of election fraud — not in Doña Ana County or anywhere else.

Brown for years spoke of rampant fraud when she introduced bills that would have required photo identification to vote in state elections. She couldn’t supply any evidence then, either.

Her version of the 2020 presidential election amounts to her echoing Trump’s claims that he was robbed in a half-dozen states. She accepts his story without question. And she expects her repetition of Trump’s whining and conspiracy theories to substitute for proof of wrongdoing.

Brown represents a solidly Republican district. She can parrot every false claim the lame-duck president has made without much of a backlash from her constituents.

Her timing is bad and her cause is nonsense.

Biden defeated Trump in New Mexico by 100,000 votes — or 11 percentage points. The race was a runaway. Stung by the result, Brown plans to concoct an attempt at rewriting history to soothe the bruised ego of her candidate.

If she’s daft enough to squander public money and legislative time on the bill, the outcome will never be in doubt.

Fellow lawmakers will bury her proposal. All Brown will have done is show she knows every bit as much about election law as she did about Roe v. Wade.

Ringside Seat is an opinion column about people, politics and news. Contact Milan Simonich at msimonich@sfnewmexican.com or 505-986-3080.

(15) comments

Leslie Rich

She needs to stop drinking the kool aid.... and come back to the real world..... I’d almost feel sorry for her, but......

Janice Olch

In response to the claims that there is no evidence of election fraud, I offer this: https://rumble.com/vcipr2-maria-zack-italy-did-it-arturo-delia-admits-to-stealing-election.html?fbclid=IwAR1ODCDYiAjF5toJdTMihApo9r_oNpILTHixdv0BSOYcIo37UMvZYdxsLhU

Richard Irell

You're joking, right?

Emily Hartigan

As if I'd make my computer vulnerable to ANYTHING this delusional!

Khal Spencer

Welcome to the post-truth world. Jonah Goldberg had a good interview about this on NPR this morning. One can assert something often enough, get it on partisan social media, and its as good as a fact.

So where is the evidence for all that fraud in NM or for that matter, the transcripts of those record number of voters documenting fraud? It sounds like Trump got drubbed here about as badly as Steve Pearce did in his run for governor. Not to mention, both houses of the Legislature are overwhelmingly Democrat.

Oh, I know. The fact that there is no evidence is evidence for a massive coverup of the facts. Lets see. It falls under argumentum ad ignorantiam fallacy. Or, petitio principii (begging the question) or hasty generalization.

These lies have already caused enough damage. Just stop.

David Ford

Well she does represent a safe district of fellow Kool-Aid imbibers (KAI) and as such is more than likely safe in her position. And just as Yvette feels comfortable in denying reality now about the election (except for her own of course!!), Ms. Browns ignorance of the law and even history should not he a badge of honor for her or her fellow KAI's....

Mike Johnson

Oh, when I saw the headline I thought Milan would be talking about Pelosi and Schumer calling for Trump's impeachment, again.......never mind.

Russell Scanlon

You don’t think what Trump did to incite his protestors was impeachable? Says a lot about your priorities. . . And your “patriotism”.

Mike Johnson

Anything is impeachable, of course. My problem is that they do not have the time to complete the process before he is out the door, it is all just a political show to pander to their base voters. But if you like that sort of waste of our legislators time and energy when there are so many more important things to do, enjoy.......they have proven they are adept at wasting their time and our money before on such useless political theatre.

David Ford

Waste time and energy? You mean like objecting to an election with ZERO proof of any fraud? It is well worth the time and appropriate to impeach him yet again. That way he can actually have something to brag about on himself "of the bestest in the history of our nation", being twice impeached most assuredly justifiable!

Craig Meyer

A President does not need to still be in office to be impeached and convicted. The one sure effect of successful impeachment is that Trump would be disqualified from ever running for President again. This would be a significant boon to the country going forward.

Emily Hartigan

Not a waste to make clear that urging people to march on the Capitol based on LIES you fabricated, is treason.

Khal Spencer

As Mike says below, impeachment takes too much time and while being impeached, the President still has all of his authorities. Its political theatre at this point, trying to paint the Senate Republicans into a bad corner. I think we have had enough drama already.

If Pence and the Cabinet are really worried that the guy is too dangerous or loopy to continue to hold his authorities, the only legal remedy that seems appropriate is the 25th Amendment. Alternatively, to firewall him from real authority as was apparently done with Richard Nixon at the end.

Or, we all cross our fingers until the 20th.

Emily Hartigan

Do you think the family of the Capitol officer who was murdered are crossing their fingers?

Mike Johnson

[thumbup]Exactly Khal.....

Welcome to the discussion.

Thank you for joining the conversation on Santafenewmexican.com. Please familiarize yourself with the community guidelines. Avoid personal attacks: Lively, vigorous conversation is welcomed and encouraged, insults, name-calling and other personal attacks are not. No commercial peddling: Promotions of commercial goods and services are inappropriate to the purposes of this forum and can be removed. Respect copyrights: Post citations to sources appropriate to support your arguments, but refrain from posting entire copyrighted pieces. Be yourself: Accounts suspected of using fake identities can be removed from the forum.