The board of the Santa Fe city and county’s joint Buckman Direct Diversion agreed to a $36 million settlement last week in a lawsuit against firms responsible for designing and constructing the water project, the agreement shows.

The settlement wraps up a portion of a case the board filed in 2018 after a variety of issues were discovered with the river diversion, including concerns over piping and raw-water pumps.

The settlement was between CH2M Hill/Western Summit Constructors, referred to in the settlement as Joint Ventures Parties, which handled construction and design for the decade-old project.

According to the settlement documents, neither party admitted wrongdoing. The agreement does not include CDM Smith Inc., the firm that handled the project’s engineering work.

They also state $35 million of the payout will go toward the release of any claims of breach of contract, professional negligence or breach of fiduciary duty against JV Parties. The remaining $1 million will release the defendants and their subconsultant, HDM Engineering, from future claims.

CH2M Hill/Western Summit Constructors said in a statement on the settlement: “The Buckman Project has been the subject of an ongoing, costly and strongly contested dispute between the Joint Venture and the Buckman Direct Diversion Board. The JV and the Board have agreed to resolve their disagreements concerning the Project without further litigation. No party to the settlement has admitted fault or wrongdoing.”

The Buckman project, completed in 2011, diverts water from the Rio Grande to a water treatment plant for use by consumers in the Santa Fe area. Since its start, the diversion has been rife with problems, including consternation over corrosive sand particles making their way into the water system. The issues have been costly, with the board allocating at least $500,000 to fix four raw-water pumps at the site combined with other issues. Buckman board Chairwoman and Santa Fe County Commissioner Anna Hansen declined to comment on the settlement.

The board released a statement saying the settlement will allow it “to address some of the difficulties encountered at the Project since its completion. The lawsuit will continue against one other defendant.”

(2) comments

Grace Trujillo

I am on Santa Fe County Water, am I in danger of getting particals from my water?

Marsden DeLapp

A few years ago I witnessed what appears to be a million dollar fraud on a BDD Solar project that involved government workers. It included a person who is not an engineer signing documents as an engineer and falsely certifying engineering work so a contractor would be paid even though they failed to provide work required by the contract. When I posted information about the fraud on social media, the NM Board of Licensure for Professional Engineers and Land Survyors came after me, threatened me and stopped me from testifying about the fraud where one of the board member’s company and employees were involved.

The investigator who threatened me and the board member who shut down the investigation into his company and employees have never faced any accountability for their actions.

I have to wonder if the BDD Board is even aware of these other issues and the cover-up.

Welcome to the discussion.

Thank you for joining the conversation on Please familiarize yourself with the community guidelines. Avoid personal attacks: Lively, vigorous conversation is welcomed and encouraged, insults, name-calling and other personal attacks are not. No commercial peddling: Promotions of commercial goods and services are inappropriate to the purposes of this forum and can be removed. Respect copyrights: Post citations to sources appropriate to support your arguments, but refrain from posting entire copyrighted pieces. Be yourself: Accounts suspected of using fake identities can be removed from the forum.