An obelisk that became the center of controversy in downtown Santa Fe has become the center of a community art project.

People sprawled across the Plaza on Wednesday to write poems and draw pictures to express their thoughts on the monument, which was erected some 150 years ago in dedication to Union soldiers and other military personnel. The project, titled Culture Connects: Behind the Masks — Uncovering the Values We Carry Forward, aims to “be a safe space for the community to express themselves,” said Rod Lambert, assistant director of the city’s Arts and Culture Department.

“This is a way to bring some happiness and processing for the community,” he said.

To many Native people in New Mexico, the obelisk is a symbol of violence and discrimination. An inscription in the stone once read that it was meant to celebrate “heroes” who defeated “savage Indians” — a phrase that has since been scratched out.

The city has announced plans to remove the monument. However, the project was suspended last month over safety concerns.

Culture Connects, Lambert said, is the city’s effort to do something positive with the landmark. Last week, 8-foot-tall plywood was put up around the monument and painted with primer. A poem from the Santa Fe Arts Commission was then glued to one wall.

Thandiwe Seagraves, 19, of Santa Fe said she wanted her piece to remind the community of its Native roots. On a print of the Plaza, Seagraves, wrote: “O’gha Po’oge, Know Where You Stand,” referring to the Tewa name for Santa Fe, and drew a heart on fire above the downtown scene.

“I’m trying to draw what I feel like is … really happening here at the Plaza,” Seagraves said. “I consider this the heart of the city, but I think the obelisk is like this stab wound through the heart.”

Ursula Aldrich of the Oglala Lakota in South Dakota who now lives in Santa Fe, chose to write a poem focused on violence against Native women. She said she hopes her words encourage all women “to take our stand” against the patriarchy.

The first line of the poem reads: “The blood of my people stained the land. Indigenous women’s struggles go hand in hand.”

The project will be on display until the end of July, if not longer, Lambert said, “depending on what happens with the monument itself.” He said there will likely be at least two more sessions like Wednesday’s, in which people can contribute art pieces on the spot, although dates are not yet scheduled.

In the meantime, Lambert encouraged people to create pieces for the project at home and drop them off at any of the three public libraries during curbside pickup hours, where there are designated drop boxes for the project.

(4) comments

Mike Johnson

I'll make up a nice display praising the colonialists for their contributions, think they will let me post it?

Lovet Strong

I'm really disappointed to see so many out-of-stater think they can speak for the rest of us locals. I cannot believe we have let these people come to destroy PUBLIC art work and cause chaos and division in OUR community. What we have seen the last few weeks is only an excuse to the rioters and looters to cause chaos in our community. The recent vandalism at India Palace is likely not the work of white supremacist, but that of professional activists sent to divide us on ethnic lines, which is primary Marxist objective. It's obvious we have paid agitators sent to tear down trace of our Spanish and mixed heritage, and this behavior will not heal past hurts. If you look at history, no ethnic group is free from violence in the settling of this great nation. Many Hispanics in New Mexico were cheated from their land so we should compensate many of these families as protesters have demanded. We can't erase history, we need to teach history as it is. Do not let the radicals divide us, we never had any issues in our community until these people moved in to cause such a divide and hatred in our community. Stay strong New Mexicans!

Shayna Rose

Hi, my name is Shayna and I’m currently doing a research project related to discussions around the obelisk at the plaza and I’m wondering if you’d be willing to say more about your comment. Specifically why you wrote this and if anything’s changed in that last month or so. Please keep in mind this is for a final research project for one of my classes and will be shared only with my professors.

Andrew Lucero

For the record, the City never announced plans to remove the monument. Webber decided to remove it himself. Under the cover of darkness. For the exception of one councilor, the rest of the City Council didn't even know about it until after Webber had already tried to remove the obelisk and hauled away the De Vargas statue.

Welcome to the discussion.

Thank you for joining the conversation on Please familiarize yourself with the community guidelines. Avoid personal attacks: Lively, vigorous conversation is welcomed and encouraged, insults, name-calling and other personal attacks are not. No commercial peddling: Promotions of commercial goods and services are inappropriate to the purposes of this forum and can be removed. Respect copyrights: Post citations to sources appropriate to support your arguments, but refrain from posting entire copyrighted pieces. Be yourself: Accounts suspected of using fake identities can be removed from the forum.