New Mexico Sen. Tom Udall, the sponsor of a 2019 bill that would eliminate funding for an unauthorized war against Iran, implored his colleagues during a Wednesday floor speech to reassert congressional war powers oversight as the U.S. and Iran move toward armed conflict.

”Congress should act, now that the president has usurped our authority and unilaterally taken us down this path of conflict with Iran,” Udall said in his remarks. “Congress has finally been briefed. And the president has not supplied convincing evidence that his strike stopped an imminent attack on U.S. forces. Nothing we’ve seen has changed my mind.

”And worse, the strike risked more American deaths and greater instability than if the president had taken a different course,” he added.

Other New Mexico Democrats in Congress also questioned the Trump administration’s handling of the relationship with Iran a day after ballistic missiles were launched at an Iraqi base that houses U.S. troops. No U.S. troops were killed or injured in the strike.

Sen. Martin Heinrich said President Donald Trump’s remarks after the attack — in which the president said Iran “appears to be standing down” — did little to clarify the administration’s goals in the volatile region. In his speech to the country, Trump suggested the U.S. will pursue economic sanctions, not military force.

“The administration has not outlined a cohesive strategy for Iran,” Heinrich said in an interview Wednesday, adding the president’s unpredictable actions “put a target on the back on Americans in the region.”

Both New Mexico senators are co-sponsors of the Senate version of the War Powers Resolution introduced by Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., last week. War powers resolutions are privileged, meaning the Senate will be forced to vote on the measure.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., announced Wednesday the House would vote Thursday morning on a nearly identical resolution requiring the Trump administration to seek congressional approval for using military force in Iran. Rep. Deb Halaand, D-N.M., voiced her support for that measure and limiting funds in a statement.

Online Now
Celebrate the Class of 2020

Submit online graduate profiles to share with family and friends free.

The Senate resolution “directs the President to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran or any part of its government or military” in the next 30 days unless force is authorized by Congress.

The resolution is expected, staff members said, to come to the floor for a vote in the next few weeks.

Heinrich said the next course of action will be forcing a debate in the Senate and requiring the administration to clarify its tactics.

“What we’re asking for right now is an accurate analysis of their security under the current situation,” Heinrich said.

Other members in the delegation said they support efforts to end further operations against Iran in a conflict that escalated last week when a U.S. drone strike in Baghdad killed Iranian Maj. Gen. Qasem Soleimani.

Rep. Ben Ray Luján, D-N.M., said in a statement the Trump administration acted dangerously and recklessly.

“Having been briefed by the administration, it is not clear their intelligence supports the actions taken over the past week,” Luján said. “What remains clear is Congress’ responsibility to prevent an unjustifiable war with Iran and to keep our country secure.”

Rep. Xochitl Torres Small, D-N.M., said that while she welcomed Trump outlining the possibility of deescalation, “further questions remain about a long-term strategy and that will require consultation and coordination with Congress.”

Show what you're thinking about this story

You must be logged in to react.
Click any reaction to login.
1
1
0
0
1

Recommended for you

(4) comments

Mark Ortiz

Meanwhile 30 days ago the entire NM Congressional delegation, Haaland, Torres-Smalls, Lujan Jr. Heinrich, and Udal all voted to approve the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 to the tune of 738 billion dollars that did NOT contain the following,

—blocking border wall $$

—low-yield nuke ban

—Iran AUMF

—end support to Saudis in Yemen

—overturn transgender troop ban

—repeal 2002 Iraq War AUMF

- addressing PFOS or PFOA levels in water supplies around 126 military bases

Barry Rabkin

The House of Representatives will do what they will but the Senate will not pass the bill. No POTUS should have to ask "mother, may I" when an opportunity emerges to kill a terrorist. Trump is right in this situation.

If he wanted to invade a country then yes, Congress must be involved in the decision. Killing a murderous terrorist, the POTUS has the authority as commander-in-chief. Even if it is a president that one or the other side of the aisle hates and despises.

Joseph Tafoya

Any resolutions seeking oversight on the President's foreign policies is purely a symbolic move and has no Constitutional authority. The Constitution specifically separates the three branches of power so that any branch may not control another. The war powers act of 1973 was designed to try and control President Nixon from sending additional troops to Vietnam and to advise congress of further escalations and for what duration. The war Powers Act at that time was no more than symbolism. The Democrats know this, but their base and the media believes with it the President can be stopped. The only power that congress has is not to fund any policy the administration puts forth. No modern day President's policies have ever been stopped with the War Powers Act. The Presidents have as a courtesy informed Congress, but not because of the War Powers Act.

Richard Reinders

If Obama had done this they would have a parade, and Trump did not declare war. Weak resolve in the past caused us the trade center attack, when the USS Cole was attacked we did nothing when the Trade Center was attacked the first time with the underground parking bombing we did nothing, so the terrorist took us as weak then we got the Trade Center plane attack. If it is a Democrat or Independent we have to say we won't tolerate killing of Americans Period. The Iranian Generals death was 40 years coming.

Welcome to the discussion.

Thank you for joining the conversation on Santafenewmexican.com. Please familiarize yourself with the community guidelines. Avoid personal attacks: Lively, vigorous conversation is welcomed and encouraged, insults, name-calling and other personal attacks are not. No commercial peddling: Promotions of commercial goods and services are inappropriate to the purposes of this forum and can be removed. Respect copyrights: Post citations to sources appropriate to support your arguments, but refrain from posting entire copyrighted pieces. Be yourself: Accounts suspected of using fake identities can be removed from the forum.