The State Ethics Commission is still considering a complaint alleging Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham violated New Mexico’s campaign finance laws by spending $6,000 on hair and makeup services.

The Secretary of State’s Office announced last month it had found no evidence of violations.

But Alamogordo resident John Block, editor of the conservative online news site Piñon Post, said he received a letter Tuesday from State Ethics Commission Director Jeremy Farris that says the commission still has authority to investigate and has forwarded the complaint to its general counsel for review.

The commission does not comment publicly on complaints unless it finds evidence of wrongdoing.

Farris’ letter, which Block provided to The New Mexican, also says the commission sent its attorneys a motion from the governor’s campaign, New Mexicans for Michelle, seeking dismissal of the complaint.

New Mexicans for Michelle argued the State Ethics Commission does not have the authority to “adjudicate alleged violations” of campaign finance law because that falls under the Secretary of State’s Office, according to the letter.

The campaign also argued that because the Secretary of State’s Office determined there was no violation, the commission waived its right to weigh in on the subject.

Farris’ letter said his agency does have jurisdiction over campaign finance laws under a joint powers agreement with the Secretary of State’s Office.

Block initially filed an ethics complaint against the governor in mid-May, alleging the use of funds for cosmetic services was a “flagrant violation” of state law.

He took issue with the governor’s decision to pay her daughter Erin Grisham, a hair and makeup specialist, $6,000 for services since 2017.

The governor’s campaign finance reports list the expenses as “media preparation” services.

In dismissing the allegation in mid-June, Election Director Mandy Vigil wrote in a letter to Block that such expenses are “reasonably attributable to the candidate’s campaign.”

Block wrote in an email Tuesday he’s pleased the State Ethics Commission is pursing the issue.

“I hope the commission will look at all the evidence showing the Governor’s blatant campaign finance violations and make a final determination based on state law, not conjecture,” he wrote.

Kendall Witmer, Lujan Grisham’s campaign spokeswoman, sent an email Tuesday referring to a previous statement she made, calling Block’s claim against the governor “blatantly sexist … frivolous and without merit.”

General Assignment Reporter

Robert Nott has covered education and youth issues for the Santa Fe New Mexican. He is assigned to The New Mexican's city desk where he covers a general assignment beat.

(3) comments

Tom Ribe

Reminds me of Donald Trump who spent tens of thousands of dollars on his makeup and his hair during his campaign. Still makes me sick to think about his narcissism and he vulgarity. MLG is a saint in comparison.

Chris Mechels

This case shows up the shortcomings in the current scheme which created the Ethics Commission. As in this case, most decisions on ethics complaints are NOT decided by the Commission, but the same old corrupt agencies who have NOT dealt with these issues in the past; namely the Secr of State and the Attorney General.

This is due to Joint Power Agreements (JPAs) between the Ethics Commission and those existing agency, which reserve nearly all the power to those agencies.

Did you REALLY expect the Trifecta to empower the Ethics Commission?? Of course not!! It would endanger them!! So, they created the Commission, and carefully tied its hands. The Commission is struggling to find purchase on this problem, and get more actual power to deal with the corruption, but it will be tough. The Trifecta carefully kept power from them.

Our media does not seem to see this, or report on it. But, as in this case, understanding of the JPAs is necessary to explain how the SOS can "clear" the Governor. As the SOS and AG are Democrats, of course they will clear the Governor!! Time to raise some a fuss with folks like Egolf and Wirth who put this fraud in place; creating the Commission and keeping the power in the corrupt agencies. Its a fraud.

Needed; restoring the power of the Grand Jury, and letting THEM investigate government corruption, and charge the many cases of Malfeasance... but then, the Democrats have, over time, taken all power FROM the Grand Jury, so they can be safe from oversight.

Richard Reinders


Welcome to the discussion.

Thank you for joining the conversation on Please familiarize yourself with the community guidelines. Avoid personal attacks: Lively, vigorous conversation is welcomed and encouraged, insults, name-calling and other personal attacks are not. No commercial peddling: Promotions of commercial goods and services are inappropriate to the purposes of this forum and can be removed. Respect copyrights: Post citations to sources appropriate to support your arguments, but refrain from posting entire copyrighted pieces. Be yourself: Accounts suspected of using fake identities can be removed from the forum.