Members of a city committee who spent more than a year studying a ban on some plastic retail bags said Tuesday they disagree with the city attorney’s view that charging customers 10 cents for a paper bag might be legally improper. They said a fee is needed to make the new law work.

The mandatory fee is a key element of the plastic bag ban, which takes effect Feb. 27. It is meant to serve as an incentive for shoppers to bring their own reusable bags and to reimburse businesses for the higher cost of paper bags.

“Not charging just guts this ordinance,” said Dena Aquilina, the general manager at Beneficial Farms and a committee member who helped draft the original ordinance. “Not charging is not the way to go.”

But since the ordinance, designed to reduce plastic litter, was passed in August 2013, Interim City Attorney Kelley Brennan has told councilors that the 10-cent charge amounts to an improper tax that Santa Fe is not authorized to impose.

The City Council will consider a change in the law next week to eliminate the 10-cent charge. That amendment was supported with reservations Tuesday by the City Business and Quality of Life Committee, comprising city councilors, business owners and residents. Members made it clear Tuesday they are not pleased with the proposed change, but will not derail the ordinance as long as the city revisits the fee as soon as possible.

Piper Kapin, owner of Backroad Pizza, said the 10-cent charge is a core element of the current ordinance. “Why is the charge approved in Santa Fe not proper,” she asked, “when in other places they are able to have it in place?”

One of the groups pushing for plastic bag bans is the Malibu, Calif.-based Surfrider Foundation, whose mission is to preserve oceans and beaches. Its website lists more than 100 plastic-bag bans around the United States and claims “the most effective ones include a small fee on paper bags to encourage more reusable bags.”

Surfrider cites some 90 ordinances in California alone, with the largest being in Los Angeles — but other bans exist in Colorado, Oregon, Texas, Iowa, New York, Massachusetts, Hawaii and Maryland. Aspen, Colo., imposes a 20-cent fee on paper bags, according to the organization’s website, and Brownsville, Texas, originally imposed a fee of $1 per bag when its ordinance took effect in January 2011, although the fee is now being scaled down. According to an article in The New York Times, the Brownsville law has eliminated 350,000 bags per day.

Zachary Shandler, assistant city attorney, acknowledged there have been just two court challenges to the bag fees — and the case in Los Angeles County has been resolved with the fee being upheld. The other challenge, which is in Colorado, is still pending.

Even though the charge was upheld in California, “the analysis was not helpful” to Santa Fe’s ordinance, and New Mexico law is quite a bit different as far as what a municipality is allowed to tax, Shandler told the committee.

City Councilor Peter Ives, an attorney, said his research supports that interpretation. The 10-cent fee could be challenged, as municipalities have limited taxing authority in New Mexico, Ives said. If the amount is called a fee, not a tax, then it has to be justified as relating to the cost of a paper bag or other purposes of the ordinance, such as environmental education. He suggested a 5-cent fee or a 7-cent fee might be more justified, as that is the actual cost of a paper bag.

Online Now
Celebrate the Class of 2020

Submit online graduate profiles to share with family and friends free.

Councilor Rebecca Wurzburger, chairwoman of the committee and an original co-sponsor, said the analysis of the 10-cent fee came to the fore only in December, when a merchant emailed a question to the city asking whether the charge was subject to gross-receipts tax. That set off the chain of events that is now leading to next week’s proposed amendment.

“Our advice is it was a tax,” Shandler said. “The council is free to accept or reject that legal opinion.”

Other amendments to be considered by the council next week include moving the ban forward with its current effective date of Feb. 27, but adding a 30-day grace period until the end of March. “The ban will be in place, but the city won’t be writing tickets during that period,” Shandler said.

The ordinance defines a single-use carryout bag as “any carryout bag made from plastic or any material except paper marketed or labeled as ‘biodegradable’ or ‘compostable’ that is neither intended nor suitable for continuous reuse as a carryout bag or that is less than 2.25 mils thick.” Stores still would be able to provide smaller bags for bulk items such as meat, produce and bakery goods.

Meanwhile, some Santa Fe businesses say they are prepared for the change.

At Party City on Cordova Road, “We are already providing our customers with paper bags. We started that about a week and a half ago,” said manager Sharee Mendez. Other Party City stores in California, for instance, have already made the change, and it’s not an inconvenience for customers, she added.

Albertsons, Santa Fe’s largest grocery chain, will offer paper bags and continue to sell reusable bags for $1, but will not offer plastic bags after Feb. 26.

But other changes would wait until the law is finalized, said Paul Bancroft-Turner, regional spokesman for Albertsons.

There is nothing in the proposed amendment to the Santa Fe bag ban that precludes retail stores from charging customers for paper bags, but Albertsons “does not foresee charging customers for paper,” Turner said.

He added that the grocery chain has made less-expensive reusable bags available in California, and they even fit in the current bag wells at the checkout, but plans for that in Santa Fe have been postponed for now. “One way or another, plastic will go away, but everything else is on hold until the vote,” he said.

Contact Bruce Krasnow at

Show what you're thinking about this story

You must be logged in to react.
Click any reaction to login.

Recommended for you

(10) comments

Mary Ellen Gallegos

Why not use boxes like at Sam's club?

Stan Bies

Just seems like this is way too much effort and time on an issue that is not that important to most people.

If the City wants to outlaw plastic . Just do that. If merchants want to supply paper bags for free, fine or charge for them, that is ok too.

Do a better job of convincing folks that reusables are the way to go. Legislating your way to what you think is appropriate behavior by taxes or penalties is condescending to your fellow citizens.

Let people not political segments make these decisions. That will lead to lasting change.

Jonathan Koolpe

Well said. And you can bet your bippy that these sorts of anti-freedom laws will inevitably lead to more such laws banning more and more items that a select few deem "bad" or "evil." What happens when the next such law passed is something that those of you who agree with the plastic bag ban think is essential or shouldn't be just out and out banned with nary a second thought to the usually much worse unintended consequences? Think outside the environmental "box" to see the far bigger picture at stake here...

John Edwards

I remember how stores used to take bottles as deposit; that went away. In Germany, 20 years ago, the norm was to carry your own shopping bags. We have become a convenience society where plastics have become integral to manufacturing, regardless of the environment. Common sense business management and profits will dictate what expenses, such as bags or labor wages, will be offset. The City's bag charge is mute, except for entities that don't have the ability to recoup the expense, when that charge is justified.

Kenneth Kast

No one has yet addressed the issue of how this will effect paper recycling, which requires a brown paper bag, if brown paper bags are no longer free.

Alfred Padilla

Figures a bunch of outsiders pushing legislation, from California no less. Hey did you fools not destroy your state? Go back to cali where you belong and fix the mess you made there before dumping your garbage here!

Jonathan Koolpe

Let me apologize profusely for the foolishness of my fellow statesmen (Surfrider). I am so sorry that this outfit from my state of residence has now seen fit to muck up another state's well-being.

I am already stuck in an area of CA where the bags have been banned for awhile me, it is a major PIA, particularly for the elderly and the disabled. Check out lines are much slower, too. And my wife recently pointed out that, as a woman, she is in greater danger from the criminal element since it takes that much longer to unload your purchases, one by one, into your vehicle in a dark, unsecured parking lot if you don't have enough reusable bags on hand (i.e. for larger purchase amounts).

And businesses are hurting, too, particularly tourist outlets as said tourists simply don't buy as much when they can't get a bag.

And the big question is: "Is it worth it?" I don't see how...paper costs more from an environmental standpoint, and that is what people have switched to in my area...most have maybe one or two reusables at the ready, but that is often not enough so they must pay for some paper bags.

I stocked up before the ban took effect, but will eventually just buy a case from Amazon when I run out. I suggest everyone do the same...local governments should be focusing on other far more important issues like crime and maintaining the city infrastructure!

Staci Benni

Your ignorance is showing Cove, Why arent you blasting Mayor Coss and Wurzburger? After all, Wurzburger chaired the committee who came up with the ban.
And why charge for bags? Stores have been giving plastic or paper bags out forever. The cost is already in the cost of the products sold. Why give stores like Whole Foods an unnecessary windfall. Ban plastic, let stores continue to give a ten cent credit for those bringing in their own bags. Which really is less destructive to the environment=recyclable plastic or recycled paper?

Donado Coviello

Because Coss and Rebbecca aren't running for re-election, that's why.

And beside I have always reused the returned paper bags that Trader Joe's collects in the front of the store for my papier-mache puppets, effigies (for burning) and pinatas, all in the image and likeness of Patti Bushee.

I've never been in Whole Foods.

Donado Coviello

I was at Home Depot and they had no bags except and ugly orange heavy plastic tote bag for 50 cents that I had to buy to put my purchases in. Screw you Patti Bushee and Bill Dimas for this stupid law.

Welcome to the discussion.

Thank you for joining the conversation on Please familiarize yourself with the community guidelines. Avoid personal attacks: Lively, vigorous conversation is welcomed and encouraged, insults, name-calling and other personal attacks are not. No commercial peddling: Promotions of commercial goods and services are inappropriate to the purposes of this forum and can be removed. Respect copyrights: Post citations to sources appropriate to support your arguments, but refrain from posting entire copyrighted pieces. Be yourself: Accounts suspected of using fake identities can be removed from the forum.