The Fogelson Library at the midtown campus in January.

The city of Santa Fe will engage in nine more months of public engagement to help it decide what to do with the 64-acre midtown campus, drawing concerns from one city councilor who said the process is dragging on far too long.

“Maybe I am just the odd person out, but I don’t feel urgency,” Councilor Signe Lindell said during Wednesday’s City Council meeting. “We pay $8,000 to $10,000 a day for this campus, and it just seems like these processes take too long and people don’t have urgency about them.

“We aren’t being as fiscally responsible as we need to be about this.”

The University of New Mexico’s Design and Planning Assistance Center will oversee an application process to bring in community groups, which will be part of a midtown engagement team. The team will hold forums to gather feedback on what the city should do with the property. Stipends will be awarded to the groups to conduct the work.

Lindell said she didn’t remember approving the process outlined at Wednesday’s meeting.

“I am frustrated with it and, budget-wise, I find it extremely painful,” Lindell said. “I know you are all tired of hearing it, but I don’t remember approving this process. I didn’t ever feel like I was signing on to another public engagement process that was going to take another nine months.”

Santa Fe was forced to return to the drawing board in January after the City Council granted a request from Dallas-based KDC Real Estate Development & Investments/Cienda Partners to mutually terminate an exclusive negotiation agreement to development the campus.

KDC/Cienda found a number of issues with the site, including concerns about the campus’s deteriorating condition.

KDC/Cienda was brought in by Team Midtown, a consortium of local organizations, to spearhead the development of the site. Its proposal beat out another local consortium of businesses and Raffles Education Corp. a Singapore-based education group.

Lindell asked how the previous submittals played into the nine-month timeline.

Economic Development Director Rich Brown said those groups have been contacted via email and that the council likely will go into executive session to discuss the proposals and return on March 31 to talk about what to do next.

While City Councilor JoAnne Vigil Coppler said she loves the idea of public engagement, she questioned whether it could be “whittled down a bit.”

City Councilor Jamie Cassutt-Sanchez acknowledged the financial hit the city takes with each passing day, but she noted that the property is as much a community investment as it is a financial investment for the city.

“I know that it takes time and that is money,” Cassutt-Sanchez said. “But I hope that as we continue to have these conversations we are thinking what this means for our community, what this means to our city and what those opportunities are.”

(11) comments

Peter Romero

If you keep talking about it no work will ever get done. Just sell the property and the businesses that know how develop do it. This is not the city's job.

John Martinez

Right on Peter!![thumbup] We don't need another way of laundering money for these city and government officials or another homeless camp, or another "covid" rehab center, or another hotel turned suboxin clinic (or whatever it is now).

Andrew Lucero


Richard Reinders

It is the cities responsibility to approve a master plan for the project, zoning requirements need to be met, it is a great opportunity for a tax generator if they do it right.

Kevin Irons

Is this the old College of Santa Fe that they are continuing to talk about? Wow 😎💲💰

Lee Vigil

Install a big community garden in the meantime and let people grow vegetables!

david cartwright

If this is not evidence of the City's incompetence to engage in such expansive projects.... richard reinders and some of the others on this chain are right. We don't need another community group group session that will just make any project even more difficult to fulfill.

Richard Reinders

When asked how do you eat an elephant the answer is one bite at a time. It doesn't have to be complicated.

Elizabeth Jones

No to community housing!!!

Stefanie Beninato

I agree with you, Richard, and Sig Lindell. What community organizations are going to bet paid to do public engagement? The same ones that were partners with the Texas based developer? It just seems like another way to perennially support these nonprofits. Time for the midtown campus to stop bleeding the city coffers. Time to stop staff-based control over the development process there--after all they will be paid no matter how long it takes.

Richard Reinders

Do a master plan then cut the project into manageable chunks and sell to developers

Welcome to the discussion.

Thank you for joining the conversation on Santafenewmexican.com. Please familiarize yourself with the community guidelines. Avoid personal attacks: Lively, vigorous conversation is welcomed and encouraged, insults, name-calling and other personal attacks are not. No commercial peddling: Promotions of commercial goods and services are inappropriate to the purposes of this forum and can be removed. Respect copyrights: Post citations to sources appropriate to support your arguments, but refrain from posting entire copyrighted pieces. Be yourself: Accounts suspected of using fake identities can be removed from the forum.