The city may soon announce a short list of master developers being considered to redevelop the midtown campus. 

The city of Santa Fe in the coming days may announce a short list of master developers in contention to redevelop the city-owned midtown campus on St. Michael’s Drive.

A nine-member evaluation committee of city department heads and staff members has been going through proposals submitted Oct. 31 by seven potential master developers in response to a city request for expressions of interest. The city’s announcement that it’s nearer to a short list is the next step in a process that will continue into the spring.

It was unknown Monday how large the short list will be, but it’s estimated three or four developers may advance to the interview stage to determine which one could be selected in April, said Daniel Hernandez, the city’s contracted project manager for the midtown campus.

“In spring, we will identify a master developer with whom we will go really deep and negotiate a development and disposition agreement toward the end of the year,” Hernandez said.

It’s possible the project that will be assembled this year could include elements from all seven master developer proposals as well as 14 proposals submitted for smaller projects or potential tenants. That is the essence of the city’s request for expressions of interest — seeking ideas and a compatible developer partner rather than the standard request for proposals process, which emphasizes complete proposals.

The midtown campus timeline specifies a Jan. 15 decision for a short-list, but there is no requirement to meet that date, Hernandez said.

The evaluation committee is composed of the city’s department heads in economic development, planning, public works, affordable housing, arts and culture, and four staff members. It has been evaluating the seven master developers on a point system assigned to a spelled-out criteria in the areas of experience, capacity, composition, approach and finance.

“How adept are they and experienced are they in fulfilling the underlying objectives in the criteria?” Hernandez said. “Are they responsive? Are they ready? Or are they preoccupied with five different projects? We need you now. Do they have deep investors that can keep a project moving forward in slow economic times?”

Mayor Alan Webber said the “courting process” tackles how experienced the master developers are and how watertight their financing packages are.

“Show us how you ‘get’ what we’re trying to do there,” Webber said. “We’re looking for a fit with a developer so it’s a partnership. Where have you done this before? Does your proposal and experience demonstrate that you understand the community values? Some have that, some don’t.”

The city seeks a master developer focused as exclusively as possible on the long-term project that could run 10 or 20 years and, in today’s dollars, is estimated at $400 million to $500 million, Hernandez said.

A new component of public input will come into play in February, March and April as the city seeks more specifics from the community of what is wanted at the midtown campus. Hernandez said city funding has been set aside to invite local organizations to engage the community in novel ways to get specific input that will be used as the city negotiates with the chosen developer.

“We will be very clear on what kind of information is valuable to us,” said Hernandez, who is still developing the specifics. “If you are a civic organization, talk to arts organizations to come up with creative venues.”

Hernandez and Webber repeatedly said the midtown campus request for expressions of interest process is all about “what the public wants.” Master developers have acknowledged their involvement is based on what the city wants. The mayor has said on multiple occasions the city will make suggestions on what master developers might want to include in their projects, but on Monday said, “We want to share the driver seat.”

The city intends to enlarge the 64-acre campus it currently owns.

The city and the state General Services Department are discussing a land swap involving 19.55 acres of state-owned land adjacent to the midtown. The city is offering 48.1 acres of land upon which the New Mexico Department of Public Safety campus sits, as well as an impound lot, both of which the state currently leases from the city.

The land swap is anticipated to be presented to the Legislature during the 30-day session.

“Nothing has been finalized,” General Services spokesman Thom Cole said.

The state land wraps around two sides of the Santa Fe Higher Education Center between the midtown campus and Siringo Road and a 7.9-acre chunk that is surrounded on three sides by the midtown campus.

An appraisal is pending but the state land is valued at $4.33 million and the city property at $8.9 million. The city is seeking $4.577 million from the state.

Show what you're thinking about this story

You must be logged in to react.
Click any reaction to login.

(3) comments

Chris Mechels

Stefanie, your concerns are well taken of course. But, isn't it clear that Alan "The King" Webber will get what he want, and THAT, of course, is what the public wants, by definition. Appointing city staff, chosen by Webber, to make the selection, is to be expected. By NOT taking a more traditional approach, letting a developer have the whole area, Alan gets to run it. But, that's what Alan does, to everything. We deserve it don't we? After all we let him buy the election, so he gets to play with his toys, us.

Stefanie Beninato

BTW when did the city form a arts and culture dept? I thought that was going to be voted on but not yet in existence. Where do we come up with all this money?

Stefanie Beninato

I take exception with the statement by Webber that the community have shaped this discussion. What we saw at Chavez over a year ago were infrastructure plans--with no common design focus.

Then from those meetings the city formulated 20 use options...no write-in additions, no way to vote last for say 4 projects etc. Now it has a "committee" of dept heads and staff IOW the city bureaucracy is evaluation these proposals--not even some citizens-- and it sure sounds like experience and financial stability are the main components with mouthing the value of understanding community values.

“Webber said. “We’re looking for a fit with a developer so it’s a partnership. Where have you done this before? Does your proposal and experience demonstrate that you understand the community values? Some have that, some don’t.” ten days ago Fast Money Webber said he had not reviewed the projects and was leaving that to a committee…now suddenly he can say some of the proposals don’t meet some criteria before the study session tonight?

And the idea that the public is going to have MEANINGFUL input is another joke. We are going to be given what is a done deal with some options.

My guess is that LANL will be involved (it is a master developer in one proposal and a tenant in 2 others) and that eventually it will become a government complex with non affordable apartments. And remember the city changed the zoning so there can be FIVE STORY bldg. there—If you want to see what that looks like—go to Cordova and Pen Rd (near the RR tracks and look at the massive ugly 4 story, 120 unit bldg. there as a visual comparison/reality check.

Welcome to the discussion.

Thank you for joining the conversation on Santafenewmexican.com. Please familiarize yourself with the community guidelines. Avoid personal attacks: Lively, vigorous conversation is welcomed and encouraged, insults, name-calling and other personal attacks are not. No commercial peddling: Promotions of commercial goods and services are inappropriate to the purposes of this forum and can be removed. Respect copyrights: Post citations to sources appropriate to support your arguments, but refrain from posting entire copyrighted pieces. Be yourself: Accounts suspected of using fake identities can be removed from the forum.