ALBUQUERQUE — A plan by New Mexico’s largest electric provider to replace part of an aging coal-fired power plant with more coal generation and a mix of natural gas, nuclear and solar power has run into another roadblock.

Albuquerque city councilors voted 6-3 late Monday to adopt a resolution that calls for the city administration to withdraw support for Public Service Co. of New Mexico’s power-replacement plan. The city joins Santa Fe, the Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority and other groups that have voiced opposition to the plan in recent months.

Albuquerque’s resolution cites what it says are economic modeling mistakes by the company, and it raises questions about fuel costs. “The costs and economics of certain elements of the agreement have changed to the detriment of the city’s ratepayers,” the resolution reads.

Councilor Brad Winter proposed the resolution. His wife, Nann Winter, is an attorney who represents the water authority, which filed a brief with state regulators earlier this month in opposition to PNM’s plan to raise customer rates.

The state Public Regulation Commission has yet to make decisions on either the power replacement plan or the rate case.

PNM fired back Tuesday, saying its plan provides the most environmental protections at the least cost to customers.

Online Now
Celebrate the Class of 2020

Submit online graduate profiles to share with family and friends free.

“No one, including the city of Albuquerque, has offered a viable plan that provides the same level of benefits at a lower cost,” spokesman Pahl Shipley said. “It’s unfortunate that a majority of councilors approved a resolution not fully based on facts.”

New Mexico Attorney General Hector Balderas weighed in on the dispute Tuesday, saying state regulators need to act in the interest of ratepayers. His office has asked the state Public Regulation Commission to require PNM to submit a finalized restructuring agreement by May 1 or submit an alternate plan.

Two units at the aging coal-fired San Juan Generating Station in northwestern New Mexico are scheduled to close under an agreement with federal and state officials to curb haze-causing pollution in the Four Corners region. The power plant currently provides electricity for more than 2 million people in the Southwest.

PNM wants to replace the lost electricity with coal from one of San Juan’s other units, electricity generated by the Palo Verde nuclear plant in Arizona, a new natural gas-fired plant and more solar generating stations.

Environmentalists and consumer-advocacy groups argue the plan doesn’t do enough to wean the state’s largest utility off fossil fuels and that ratepayers could be locked in to coal and nuclear power for years to come.

More than 60 percent of electricity generated by PNM in 2014 came from coal. If regulators were to approve the power-replacement plan, the utility says coal generation would drop below 50 percent and nuclear would to increase to one-third. Renewables would total more than 11 percent.

Show what you're thinking about this story

You must be logged in to react.
Click any reaction to login.

Recommended for you

(3) comments

David Mulberry

The Sierra Club’s anti-coal campaign is getting a boost of up to $60 million from donors including Michael Bloomberg, who pledged $30 million Wednesday to further the group’s new goal of shuttering half the nation’s coal-fired power plants by 2017. Bloomberg announced that more than a dozen additional donors have pledged to match Bloomberg Philanthropies’ $30 million commitment — bringing the total to $60 million.

Steve Harbour

The real question is are you willing to pay 2, 3, 5 times the current rate for power to combat climate change while the rest of the industrialized world does little or nothing?

Alasdair Lindsay

Future costs need to factored into the PNM equation. Customers want changes that will be good choices for decades to come as we continue to witness the effects of climate change. Climate change is not going away, but PNM may be if they do not get a reality check.

Welcome to the discussion.

Thank you for joining the conversation on Please familiarize yourself with the community guidelines. Avoid personal attacks: Lively, vigorous conversation is welcomed and encouraged, insults, name-calling and other personal attacks are not. No commercial peddling: Promotions of commercial goods and services are inappropriate to the purposes of this forum and can be removed. Respect copyrights: Post citations to sources appropriate to support your arguments, but refrain from posting entire copyrighted pieces. Be yourself: Accounts suspected of using fake identities can be removed from the forum.