Democrats in the state Senate on Thursday won a decisive round in the long-simmering bout between anti-abortion and abortion-rights factions.

And they did it without saying much at all.

Democratic senators in favor of Senate Bill 10 — which repeals a 52-year-old state law that makes it a felony to perform an abortion — simply chose not to debate the legislation, leaving frustrated Republicans to talk among themselves.

Outnumbered GOP senators clearly were unhappy with the strategy as the measure passed 27-15.

“No more trying to justify anything, let’s just do it because we can,” Sen. Bill Sharer, R-Farmington, said of Democrats’ unwillingness to engage in discussion about the bill on the Senate floor.

Though past attempts to repeal the law had failed, with eight conservative Democrats casting critical votes on a similar bill two years ago, the party’s ideological makeup in the Senate is now far different, far more progressive.

Republicans this year could only fight a defensive battle with little help from the other side of the aisle. GOP members spent much of the debate introducing amendments and substitute bills, many of which included a “conscience” clause allowing doctors to opt out of performing abortions.

They also offered up two pieces legislation setting limits on when a woman could have an abortion, going to 35 weeks with one amendment. But all those efforts failed with votes that ran mostly along party lines.

At certain times during a session that lasted more than three hours, the parties jousted over whether proper procedures were being followed in the introduction of those bills, confusing matters considerably at one point.

The final vote did not run entirely along party lines. Two Democrats — Sens. Pete Campos of Las Vegas and George Muñoz of Gallup — sided with Republicans in opposing the legislation. But the Democrats still had the numbers.

The bill now heads to the House of Representatives, where it is expected to easily pass.

The action is a victory for pro-choice advocates who believe it is a woman’s right to decide what to do with her body, and for Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham, who backs the measure. In a statement released shortly after the vote, the governor said the bill “affirms a woman’s self evident autonomy over her own body.”

Abortion-rights advocates are concerned the federal courts could undermine or overturn the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark Roe v. Wade decision that made abortion legal. Proponents of the bill worry the 1969 law criminalizing abortion could become enforceable again if the conservative majority in the U.S. Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade.

At the outset of Thursday’s floor debate, Sen. Linda Lopez, D-Albuquerque, the main sponsor of the bill, introduced it in both Spanish and English.

“We can hold our own moral values on abortion and still trust a woman,” she said.

She then turned the floor over to several other female senators from her party, who related personal stories of having to make their own decisions regarding difficult health care choices — though none involved abortion.

“We need to leave individual health care decisions to a woman and her doctor, not allowing politicians to stand in the way,” said Sen. Carrie Hamblen, D-Las Cruces. “I, as a woman, should have the power to control what happens to my body. This is something no government should have a say in.”

Then, in a rare move for a floor debate, Lopez chose not to say anything else about the bill. Repeatedly asked by Republicans to weigh in on the bill, she “respectfully” declined to comment.

Lopez could not be reached for comment after the vote.

Many Democrats — perhaps realizing they had the numbers to pass the bill, or perhaps just tired of debating the legislation — took a cue from Lopez’s lead and clammed up as well.

At one point, Sen. Craig Brandt, R-Rio Rancho, asked if any of the bill’s 28 sponsors [five are House members and thus were not present on the Senate floor] would stand up and talk about the bill.

When no one took up the challenge, Brandt said, “I think that says everything we need to say,” then added their silence was reason enough to throw out the bill.

House Speaker Brian Egolf, D-Santa Fe, said Thursday he expects SB 10 to land on the House floor soon, though it will likely go through at least one House committee for vetting.

“We’re not sure exactly yet when we’re going to be meeting on the floor of the House next week,” Egolf said. “If we have a meeting late in the week, we might be able to send a bill to the governor then. If not, very early in the week following.”

General Assignment Reporter

Robert Nott has covered education and youth issues for the Santa Fe New Mexican. He is assigned to The New Mexican's city desk where he covers a general assignment beat.

(16) comments

Steve Martinez

What will happen to this bill when the majority Catholic SCOTUS repeals Roe v Wade, and makes abortion illegal again?

Dennis Martinez

This is sad and opens the door to abortion and abortion is murder, period. Carmen

Mike Johnson

Thank goodness, now the left wing Ds can move on to something more significant, relevant, and important to all the people. But, I am sure they are sad to see this fund-raising gravy train of a red herring disappear. They will have to find some other irrelevant windmill to tilt at......[lol]

Chad Light

This is awesomeness. Infuriating The Q losers in the state house makes me happy. Democrats win.

Khal Spencer

"Owning the libs" or "owning the conservatives" is the stupidity that got us into the political mess we are in. Think about it.

Margaret Eyler

If life begins at conception—scientifically speaking—then what about the “women’s rights” of the unborn person, if she is female? Legally and scientifically speaking, I have yet to hear a good argument against this.

Joe Ray Anaya

Here is a scenario Margaret... you are at lab getting blood work. A fire breaks out and in the corner of the room there is 5 year old child terrified of the fire and 5 test tube embryos. You can only physically carry out one or the other from the fire, the 5 yr old or the 5 embryos. Which do you choose to save and why?

Margaret Eyler

Ha that’s a ridiculous proposal! Doesn’t answer the question.

John Martinez

Joe Ray you sound very ignorant.....a 35 week unborn baby is not an embryo any longer. It is a human being. Do you have kids? Have you seen a premature baby be born?

Jim Klukkert

John Martinez posts comments that are truly threatening. Very un-Christian, very self righteous, very not needed in these difficult times

Khal Spencer

Your premise is OK, but the question isn't whether "life" begins at conception but when does the state acquire a compelling interest in the developing fetus. We can argue all day, as folks have for fifty years, about this. Meanwhile, the law on the books is draconian, not supported by the public or by compelling public interest, and has to go.

Good chapter in Peter Singer's Practical Ethics on this issue.

Daniel Werwath

A "controversial" repeal of an unenforceable law that is superseded by the US Supreme Court? C'mon editors, do better.

Richard Irell

The law is only unenforceable if Roe v. Wade remains the law of the land. You might be aware that the Republicans have managed to get a conservative majority on the SCOTUS. So there is a real risk of it being overturned.

Dennis Martinez

I hope so.

Khal Spencer

Now let's get it through the house.

Donato Velasco

can not regulate human reproduction .. should eliminate this law completely

Welcome to the discussion.

Thank you for joining the conversation on Santafenewmexican.com. Please familiarize yourself with the community guidelines. Avoid personal attacks: Lively, vigorous conversation is welcomed and encouraged, insults, name-calling and other personal attacks are not. No commercial peddling: Promotions of commercial goods and services are inappropriate to the purposes of this forum and can be removed. Respect copyrights: Post citations to sources appropriate to support your arguments, but refrain from posting entire copyrighted pieces. Be yourself: Accounts suspected of using fake identities can be removed from the forum.