When the earth shakes anywhere in the world, scientists are keenly interested in what happened. Was it an earthquake? A chemical explosion? A collapsing mine? Or, was it a nuclear explosion?

At Los Alamos National Laboratory, we’re especially interested in the answer to the last question. Making sure the world is safe from nuclear proliferation means we need to monitor the globe for nefarious activity.

As you can imagine, a bad actor who wants to hide a nuclear test isn’t going to volunteer a lot of information regarding its whereabouts. That’s where nuclear explosion signatures come in.

A signature can come from seismic, acoustic or chemical signals — or all of the above. As a geologist at the lab, I’m most interested in understanding how rocks and subsurface features such as faults affect the seismic waves generated by the explosion. The speed at which those waves travel depends on the type of rock they move through.

Unfortunately, real life is not like the movies. While we have technology that can do something like a CT scan, the image isn’t as detailed as the scan of a body. Ideally, subsurface imaging requires both underground and above-ground sensors to obtain data that we use to interpret rock structure. The end product is less like a photograph and more like a cartoon.

In addition, seismic monitoring stations are often positioned great distances from where a blast occurs, so we need information about the area’s geology to figure out how far and how fast the signal traveled to determine where the blast originated.

My job is to help build computer models of geographical areas of interest so that when seismic monitoring stations detect an event, we can use the seismic data and the geologic model to determine where the event occurred. Geologic models are also important tools to estimate the seismic response of future events.



We start by asking what we know about the rocks in the area. Are they porous? How hard are they? How much water do they contain? What is the fracture network like? With that knowledge, we build a framework model of those rocks and the subsurface structure. The earth below our feet is not just simple pancake layers of different kinds of rock, as you may have seen in illustrations in your grade-school textbooks. The subsurface is actually much more complex.

I like to equate my work to going grocery shopping. You start with an empty shopping cart and then, as you walk through the store, you pick different items off the shelf to fill it, which you then combine when you get home to make a recipe. Similarly, in building these computer models, I’m using a variety of “ingredients” such as geologic maps and drilling data to best feed the computer model.

Huge amounts of data exist from when the United States conducted underground nuclear tests in the Nevada desert from the 1950s to the 1990s (the last U.S. test of a nuclear weapon was in 1992). Those four decades of test data serve as the basis for our understanding of how seismic waves from nuclear explosions propagate through the rocks in Nevada. We can take that knowledge and extrapolate it to other locations. The Earth’s geology is extremely diverse, however, and one location is rarely just like another, so we need to use other clues to fill in the blanks.

For example, we know that mountains made of granite are high and steep-sided, such as Yosemite in California, which is famous for its dramatic cliff faces. That’s because the minerals in granite have grown into interlocking crystals, which makes granite strong enough to hold up those steep slopes. But sandstone is made of small grains that are cemented together, which means it isn’t as strong and therefore creates shallower slopes, such as those in the Badlands of South Dakota.

Understandably, seismic waves will create very different signals depending on whether they’re moving through granite or sandstone. So when we create a model for a certain region of the world, we look at the topography of the location and use publicly available maps, GPS satellite data, and other open-source information to determine what type of rock lies underneath. We also look at clues such as nearby water sources, past earthquake data, and other seemingly minor details that can make a big difference in the accuracy of a model. Thinking back to the shopping cart analogy: We need to make sure we pick the right items off the shelf and don’t forget any important ingredients.

These models are then used by scientists to help pinpoint the location of the blast. The better our models are, the better our analyses of explosions can be, and the better informed our leaders will be on what’s happening in remote locations around the world. All of this helps stop the spread of nuclear weapons and keeps the world safer.

To learn more about how scientists at Los Alamos investigate nuclear explosions, visit the new “Explosion Detectives” exhibit at the newly reopened Bradbury Science Museum in downtown Los Alamos. Admission is free and open to the public. For more information, visit www.lanl.gov/museum.

Elizabeth Miller is a geologist specializing in nuclear nonproliferation at Los Alamos National Laboratory.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Thank you for joining the conversation on Santafenewmexican.com. Please familiarize yourself with the community guidelines. Avoid personal attacks: Lively, vigorous conversation is welcomed and encouraged, insults, name-calling and other personal attacks are not. No commercial peddling: Promotions of commercial goods and services are inappropriate to the purposes of this forum and can be removed. Respect copyrights: Post citations to sources appropriate to support your arguments, but refrain from posting entire copyrighted pieces. Be yourself: Accounts suspected of using fake identities can be removed from the forum.