Amy Thomas is already thinking of the next batch of second grade students who will arrive in August at Santa Fe’s Piñon Elementary School.

Having transitioned online students back to in-person learning in the pandemic-tinged 2020-21 school year, Thomas knows she’ll have plenty of teaching to do when kids walk through Piñon’s front doors. As she discovered in recent months, some of the simplest procedures and routines, like how to label a paper, were lost, she said.

“I have to say, the biggest thing I’m worried about is their writing skills,” Thomas said. “They spent so much time on the computer.”

In hopes of reimplementing key lessons and concepts lost during the pandemic, students and teachers will come back to school sooner than ever, thanks to Santa Fe Public Schools’ decision to participate in an extended learning program funded by the state. In essence, it means 10 extra days have been added to the school year — most of them during a time that had traditionally been the end of summer break. It will boost instructional days to 185.

Fewer than 20 percent of New Mexico’s schools made it to the 180 instructional days mark, a requirement in most states, according to a 2018 legislative evaluation of extended learning programs. New Mexico opts to require 990 instructional hours instead.

For Thomas, the extra days are a boon. “I think it will help level the playing field,” she said.

For others, it’s a disappointment — some parents and teachers complain there wasn’t enough discussion on the matter before the district set next year’s school calendar, in which teachers will return to work Aug. 2 and students Aug. 6.

Denise Rappmund, whose 8-year-old son, Sacha, attends El Dorado Community School, understands why Santa Fe Public Schools would want to participate in the extended learning program. But she questions why more parent input wasn’t solicited before finalizing the move just weeks before the end of the 2020-21 school year. When she found out about the change in mid-May, she was irritated and confused.

“I kept thinking I must have missed something,” she said.

For the Rappmund family, the start of the new school year collides with a long-delayed funeral of a close family member. And though the district has offered, through individual schools, flexibility to families who may not be able to make the first day of classes, Rappmund said school in early August slices into family time.

“I get that they’re offering flexibility. I just find that to be awkward for all parties, when you have kids sort of trickling in at random dates. But also I just didn’t really want to cut my son’s summer short,” she said.

Santa Fe Public School’s decision to participate in the extended learning program adds a boost of $6 million to its $259.5 million budget. Outgoing Superintendent Veronica García said most, if not all, of those dollars will go toward providing the extra 10 days of instruction, noting regaining lost learning time is critical.

“It sends a very bad message to the Legislature when this additional funding is made available to provide extended learning opportunities to your students and you turn that down,” said García, a former head of the Public Education Department. “The likelihood of seeing additional funding for programming for students is important. I also feel it would have been unconscionable to not provide this additional support to our students given the last year we’ve had.”

Still, even teachers worry what early August will look like in their classrooms.

“Well, I’m a little bit apprehensive about it because I worry about what our attendance is going to be like,” said Mary Stipe, a sixth grade English teacher at Ortiz Middle School. “I have a feeling that we’re going to run into a good percentage of kids that [are] still out of the country and not back physically for school. I’m optimistic it’s going to be helpful for students.”

Stipe said she’ll have to change how she approaches her lessons at the beginning of the year to assess where students are in terms of learning.

Extended learning isn’t a new concept in Santa Fe or throughout the state. Such programs have been offered locally as “jump-starts” at participating schools, and about 1,250 of the district’s roughly 12,000 students participated last summer.

Debbie Rael, an associate superintendent for instruction and school support, is enthusiastic about the extra time students will get in August.

“Students who struggle in a typical school year likely have really had a different experience during the pandemic, which causes us to believe that more time in school, narrowing in on the curriculum is going to support them,” Rael said last week.

Stipe taught during Ortiz Middle School’s supplementary extended learning program last summer, and she saw how incoming sixth graders who participated were more confident with some learning strategies by the time late August rolled around. But that, she noted, was supplementary, optional.

“This is about recovery,” Stipe said.

As they considered the calendar, district leaders chose not to put additional learning days after Memorial Day 2022. But Nina Otero Community School teacher Jennifer Warren wonders if that would have been a better option.

“I wish there had been an opportunity to complete some sort of survey or give ideas as to how to add the additional 10 days,” Warren wrote in an email. “My personal preference would have been to add it to the end of the ’21-’22 school year so everyone could have ample time to plan.”

García, who is retiring this summer, said the district doesn’t conduct surveys regarding the calendar year, though it asked parents for input on a variety of subjects during the pandemic.

“We applied for a myriad of grants and programming; we do not survey our parents for every grant or program,” she added.

Warren wrote she didn’t know about the move to early August until May 12, six days after the school board approved the calendar. According to the school’s website, the calendar was published May 7.

García acknowledged the decision came in late.

“We were really behind the eight ball with time. I want to say it was much later than we would have preferred,” she said.

García said she sees extended learning as a short-term solution after a year of altered learning during the pandemic as well as a long-term signal of where the district and state are headed in terms of the length of the school year. The subject has provided vigorous debate locally and nationally — are there enough teaching days in the traditional school calendar?

García said she anticipates funding to extend the school year will continue across the state in coming years.

In the past, the district has participated in another extended learning program, K-5 Plus, which extends the year by 25 days for participating grade school students. But García said it was difficult to meet the requirements of that particular program this year; the district embraced extended learning across all grades. The Associated Press reported earlier this year that only one-third of school districts across the state participated in extended-time programs in the 2019-20 school year. During the pandemic, more than $100 million allocated for the programs remained untouched.

In a news release Friday, the Public Education Department said about 60 percent of the state’s students are projected to be part of either K-5 Plus or the extended learning program next year. The department called the increased participation a boost, but it still falls short of the Legislature’s hopes.

“Additional classroom time is a powerful tool to accelerate learning, and the two programs are a core component of the state’s strategy to improve educational outcomes for every student in alignment with the Yazzie-Martinez consolidated lawsuit,” the department said in the news release.

Correction: This story has been amended to reflect the following error: an earlier version had an incorrect spelling for the name of Denise Rappmund's son, Sacha.

(8) comments

Sarah Bolleter-Gonzales

I will never understand why they would choose to have students return to school on a Friday. Not that it matters but if Teachers return on August 2nd, the following Monday, August 9th, would make more sense for students to return.

Yolanda Archambeault

Any decision will have pros and cons. Everyone needs a fresh start and this next school year will be just that. Getting into the groove of learning. Support your teachers and ask how can I help.

Ben Dehoe

Aw, C'mon people! According to the calendar, August 6 is TWO-AND-A-HALF MONTHS from today! That is plenty enough time for a long and relaxing summer vacation. I have Taiwanese and South Korean friends who tell me they don't have summer breaks in their countries. They get a week off in August--and then it's back to school. (I guess this explains why so many Asian kids can play Mozart sonatas at 4-years old...or why Asian kids, when they happen to move to America, are miles ahead of our kids.

Lisa Jo Goldman

Always a top-down approach with politics as a the center of this decision. God-forbid we give educators and students a break...and families. Let's get students back SOONER because, you know, they're "falling behind" in the learning rat-race. Meanwhile, those of us who attempt to see family (after over a year of Covid) out-of-state are screwed. All that matters is kids not "falling behind". Falling behind WHAT, I might ask? Who or what is determining what we are falling behind, hmmm?

Richard Reinders

This is why this state is 50th Me Me Me instead of the best interest of the children, you'll be whining later when your 30 year old children are still living with you and off you because you wanted a break.

Alan Lucero

Given that we as a country have a lower literacy rate than most industrialized countries and a lower rate than many developing countries, and given that NM has lower literacy and numeracy rates than most of the country, it's not at all valid to call our crawling pace a "rat race". As for criticism of a "top-down" approach: given that various families have plans for different segments of the summer break, would the disappointment regarding a revised school calendar have been any different had the extended days been immediately after Memorial Day? Logically one would conclude not. As for the question of "falling behind what?" (painful to even type that out), a surfeit of information is available from even a modest research effort in the area of academic achievement around the globe (try the NAEP exam results as a starter).

Marci Mel

Yes, it's nice to be asked for your opinion in a survey but after a year of distance learning, no, we don't need to survey parents about adding on another week or two. I'm sorry if people's plans are messed up. I'm a parent, too. Lots of plans have been messed up since March 2020. The kids need the extra classroom time and we have the money for it. Thank you for standing up for the kids, Superintendent Garcia.

Need a survey to feel better? Here's a survey: Do you want the kids in this city to get all the resources they need to ensure they're reading and writing at or above grade level?

Dielica Gold

As a parent, this decision has made me incredibly angry; this past year has been SO stressful for students and they deserve a proper break!

My son usually spends the Summer visiting his father out of state. Last year, due to the pandemic, he didn't get to do that, and this year his trip will be cut short by almost two weeks?

I wish I had been asked beforehand!

Sure, there were surveys to fill out during the school year, but all of them were for our distance learning preferences.

This is MY child and I should at least have some input regarding his academic schedule.

There are more important things than academics. Such as mental and emotional health, family, and yes, sometimes even fun.

Welcome to the discussion.

Thank you for joining the conversation on Please familiarize yourself with the community guidelines. Avoid personal attacks: Lively, vigorous conversation is welcomed and encouraged, insults, name-calling and other personal attacks are not. No commercial peddling: Promotions of commercial goods and services are inappropriate to the purposes of this forum and can be removed. Respect copyrights: Post citations to sources appropriate to support your arguments, but refrain from posting entire copyrighted pieces. Be yourself: Accounts suspected of using fake identities can be removed from the forum.