Fifty percent of parents of children in Santa Fe Public Schools who responded to a new enrollment form said they would prefer their son or daughter learn remotely for the entire school year, the district announced Wednesday.

“These results are a game changer for the District,” Superintendent Veronica García said in a statement. “Though we still need to contact parents we have not yet heard from, if the percentages hold, we may have to hit a reset button on our return-to-school staffing plans.”

Students will complete their coursework online for at least the first nine weeks of the fall semester, which begins Aug. 20. The district plans to gradually resume in-person learning once the state’s coronavirus spread rate begins to stabilize.

Like many states, New Mexico saw an uptick in infections last month. The results of the questionnaire seem to indicate many parents feel it is still too risky to send their children back to the classroom.

“Our parents, teachers, staff and community are struggling with how to best protect students, juggle work demands, child care issues, and ensure quality learning,” García said. “We knew that the 2020-2021 school year would not be one-size-fits-all and designed plans to deliver high-quality learning across the spectrum.”

She added: “The strong desire for year-long remote learning is telling of parents’ fears and concerns as the school year begins.”

More than 4,200 parents responded to the July 29 inquiry on their education model preference, according to the district. Some of those parents have more than one child in Santa Fe Public Schools. In all, the results account for around 5,100 of the district’s 13,000 students.

The form asked parents whether they want their children to be enrolled in a remote-learning program or a hybrid model once the district is able to resume in-person instruction.

“There will be remote for families who want it and there will be hybrid for families who want it,” García said in an interview.

According to the district, at least half of the parents at 18 of the district’s 29 schools said they intend to have their children learn remotely for the full school year.

The results showed 72 percent of parents who responded at Ramirez Thomas Elementary School were in favor of having a fully remote school year. At E.J. Martinez Elementary, the tally was 69 percent.

At Ortiz and Milagro middle schools, the majority of parents who responded — 59 percent and 52 percent respectively — supported remote learning. At Capital and Santa Fe high schools, the breakdown was 52 percent and 42 percent respectively.

The district will use the results to pair “students with the teachers they will have for the entire year,” García said.

“Now the challenge will be for each school to contact the parents we didn’t reach,” she said, noting the district still has to get a hold of some 8,000 parents.

“We have a lot of work to do,” she said. “I wish the response was higher, but we will forge ahead.”

Last month, school officials released the results of a districtwide survey that showed parents were almost evenly split between online learning, a full return to classrooms and a hybrid model that combines the two.

The numbers released Wednesday show that “people’s attitudes are shifting so rapidly,” school board President Kate Noble said.

Under the hybrid model, half of the district’s students would be on campus while the other half would log in remotely. If 50 percent of families opt out of the hybrid model, that might work out well for the district, Noble said.

“There’s a lot of ways this can go,” she said. “Ultimately, I have enormous faith in Dr. García and her team in solving an enormously complicated puzzle.”

(9) comments

Caitlin Smith

The survey was poorly designed, and I hope the district doesn't rely on it too much. It asked families if they wanted kids to be in school or remote, but it didn't say anything about the parameters for when or how in-person instruction would start. I said I wanted my child to go back to school, because I do---but not with this level of community spread, and only with strong plans for masking, ventilation, distancing, and contact tracing. I'm really worried that the district will forge ahead with in-person learning prematurely and say, "Well, you wanted your kid back in school."

Ted Nugent

I thought Santa Fe private schools were forging forward, despite public health guidance, and starting school this month? And here I was cheering for them for such bravery. I thought they would serve as the model for our public schools. Que pasa?

David Ford

"despite public health guidance"???

Maybe they decided that to follow the science and "public health guidance" was not what you call bravery, but what I would call intelligence...

Kathy Fish

Ah, how the tables have turned, Kathy "Connie Lopez" Cota. As I recall, you were the one deploring "lazy teachers" in their jammies for advocating alongside public health experts. Sorry - looks like we're going to do what's best for our students after all, despite your scorn and even if that means working online, and we probably won't know exactly what that looks like until the fall semester, and then the spring semester, begin. Please remember, everyone - teaching young children online is taxing, not least of all for the teachers themselves. Online work is more work, period, plus more stress and anxiety for everyone involved. The only way to approach this topic is with compassion and deference to the public health experts - and the educators, who have always known our students best.

Ted Nugent

Kathy fish, you are correct. We finally agree on something. Question for you: do you think st. Mike and other local private schools provide parent with significant tuition decrease while students receive laptop education from their household bedroom? What are your thoughts? I would think it's the fairest approach.

Kathy Fish

Costs don't really decline just because school moves online. Overhead is obviously lower, and parents shouldn't have to pay for meals, buses, uniforms, or sports programming, but the cost of retaining faculty and other professional services, like counseling, tutoring, and advising, remains the same. If parents can afford it, they should swing the tuition, whatever the school proposes, since it may decide whether the school has to close its doors or not for good. Of curse, this might also be an interesting time for public schools and the community college to shine - and to gain credibility. If wealthier, largely white parents decide to send their kids to public school instead of private, they'll become invested on a variety of levels, and those schools will improve for everyone, no matter your income. Most won't argue that private schools set up an elitist precedent that stays with kids through adulthood.

reta saffo

But, of course. This is only common sense being used here.

Stephen Hauf

Whoever said sense was common

David Ford

[thumbup]love it!

Welcome to the discussion.

Thank you for joining the conversation on Please familiarize yourself with the community guidelines. Avoid personal attacks: Lively, vigorous conversation is welcomed and encouraged, insults, name-calling and other personal attacks are not. No commercial peddling: Promotions of commercial goods and services are inappropriate to the purposes of this forum and can be removed. Respect copyrights: Post citations to sources appropriate to support your arguments, but refrain from posting entire copyrighted pieces. Be yourself: Accounts suspected of using fake identities can be removed from the forum.