Stay or go? Californians to decide fate of Gov. Gavin Newsom

Supporters hold up signs as California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks at a rally ahead of the California gubernatorial recall election Monday, Sept. 13, 2021, in Long Beach, Calif.

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Tuesday became the second governor in U.S. history to defeat a recall aimed at kicking him out of office early, a contest the Democratic governor crafted as part of national battle for his party’s values in the face of the coronavirus pandemic and lingering threats from “Trumpism.”

The victory cements Newsom as a prominent figure in national Democratic politics and preserves his prospects for a future U.S. run.

It also ensures the nation’s most populous state will remain in Democratic control as a laboratory for progressive policies on immigration, climate change, representation and inequality. A Republican almost certainly would have replaced Newsom had the recall succeeded, bringing a polar opposite political worldview, though they would have had to contend with a state Capitol dominated by Democrats.

The recall, which turned on Newsom’s approach to the pandemic, mirrored the nation’s heated political divide over business closures and mask and vaccine mandates, and both parties will dissect its outcome heading into the 2022 midterm elections.

President Joe Biden sought validation of the Democratic Party’s approach of tighter restrictions and vaccine requirements, urging Californians to show the nation that “leadership matters, science matters.” The race also was a test of whether opposition to former President Donald Trump and his right-wing politics remains a motivating force for Democrats and independents.

“We defeated Donald Trump, we didn’t defeat Trumpism. Trumpism is still alive, all across this country,” Newsom said as he campaigned in a state that the former president lost by 29 percentage points.

Republicans had hoped for proof that frustrations over months of pandemic precautions would drive voters away from Democrats. They also searched for evidence that voters were tiring of liberal leadership. Democrats have controlled every level of government in California for more than a decade, a period marked by a housing crisis and the increasingly damaging effects of climate change. Republicans won back four U.S. House seats last year, success that leaders hoped had indicated revived signs of life.

Voters were asked two questions: Should Newsom be recalled, and, if so, who should replace him? Only a handful of the 46 names on the replacement ballot had any level of public recognition, but most failed to gain traction with voters.

Conservative talk radio host Larry Elder, who entered the race just three months before Election Day, quickly rose to the top of the pack of contenders. But that allowed Newsom to turn the campaign into a choice between the two men, rather than a referendum on his performance.

Newsom seized on Elder’s opposition to the minimum wage and abortion rights as evidence he was outside the mainstream of California. The governor branded him as “more extreme than Trump,” while Biden called him “the closest thing to a Trump clone I’ve ever seen.”

Though the contest didn’t quite bring the circus-like element of California’s 2003 recall — when voters replaced Democratic Gov. Gray Davis with Republican movie star Arnold Schwarzenegger — it featured quirky moments of its own.

Reality TV star and former Olympian Caitlyn Jenner entered the race but gained little momentum and left the state for part of the campaign to film a reality show in Australia. Businessman John Cox, who lost badly to Newsom in 2018, tried to spice up his campaign by hiring a live bear to join him, branding himself as the “beast” to Newsom’s “beauty.” The best known Democrat on the replacement ballot was a 29-year-old YouTube star who dispenses financial advice to his followers.

The recall, initiated by an amateur political organizer, wasn’t the first attempt to oust Newsom, and it began as an expression of frustration over Democrats’ grip on power. But when Newsom issued the nation’s first statewide stay-at-home order, the pandemic became the race’s driving force.

Recall organizers needed about 1.5 million signatures — California has 22 million registered voters — to make the ballot. They owe their success in part to a single day in November, when a judge gave them four extra months to gather signatures due to the pandemic.

That same day, Newsom attended a birthday party with friends and lobbyists at the lavish French Laundry restaurant, a gathering that violated his pandemic rules. The episode spiraled into a public relations disaster.

Supporters of the recall expressed frustration over months-long business closures, restrictions that kept most children in distance learning for a full academic year, and the confusing patchwork of rules that governed how people could gather with friends and family. Rising homicides, an unabated homelessness crisis and an unemployment fraud scandal further angered Newsom’s critics.

But the broader public stayed on Newsom’s side. Polling from the Public Policy Institute of California showed his approval rating remaining above 50% throughout the pandemic. With weeks to go, the institute’s poll showed 60% of Californians approved of Newsom’s handling of the pandemic.

In the early months of his campaign, Newsom declared California was “roaring back” from the virus, and he used a windfall of tax dollars to dole out billions for programs from child education to homelessness. Middle- and low-income Californians got checks of up to $1,100 each.

The rise of the highly contagious delta variant over the summer dampened Newsom’s positive messaging, as he began to frame the race as one of “life or death” consequences. He pointed to Texas and Florida, which were seeing worsening surges as their Republican governors rejected mask and vaccine mandates, as cautionary tales for what California could become. When Texas’ new law banning most abortions took effect Sept. 1, Newsom’s comparison with the GOP state only became more stark.

Newsom’s administration has mandated children wear masks in schools and is requiring all health care workers to get vaccinated. Teachers and government employees must be vaccinated or tested regularly. Ace Smith, one of Newsom’s political consultants, said before the race concluded that he believed it would provide Newsom — and the Democratic Party — a “clear mandate” for “sanity” on public health.

The party’s biggest luminaries stepped out for Newsom, highlighting the national stakes. Beyond Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders and former President Barack Obama appeared in state or in campaign ads to help Newsom drive up turnout.

National Republican leaders largely kept the contest at arm’s length. Trump barely commented on the race until the final days, when he suggested with no evidence that the results would be rigged because of mail-in balloting. One of the recall’s original organizers said his comments would do more harm than good.

In the closing days, Elder’s campaign echoed Trump’s messaging, saying he expects “shenanigans” and linking to a website insinuating Newsom had already won the election due to fraud. The site included language from a petition circulated to help Trump’s effort to overturn last year’s presidential election, but that wording was removed by Tuesday afternoon.

Former San Diego Mayor Kevin Faulconer, once considered the party’s best hope to win back statewide office given his record in a Democratic city, failed to find his niche with voters, struggling to appeal to both the party’s base and the broader electorate. Elder immediately captured attention from the party’s conservative grassroots, but he also alienated independents and Democrats who may have considered a vote against Newsom.

Newsom has been viewed as a potential White House contender since at least 2004, when he defied federal law to issue marriage licenses to LGBT couples as mayor of San Francisco. His victory maintained those prospects, though he will still have to navigate around the ambitions of Harris, who came up through San Francisco politics alongside Newsom.

Newsom came to the contest with advantages — it was his to win or lose. California’s electorate is less Republican, less white and younger than it was in 2003, when voters booted the Democratic Davis. Newsom was allowed to raise unlimited funds, dwarfing his competitors while flooding TV screens with advertising. Public worker unions and business and tech executives poured millions into his campaign.

The GOP had looked to build on its four congressional wins in 2020 and recruited tens of thousands more volunteers to campaign for the recall. Voter turnout and the recall results in the four Southern California districts, in Orange County and the Los Angeles suburbs, will offer an early indication of the party’s ability to hold the seats next year.

Though Newsom defeated the recall, he may soon be running against Elder again: The governor is up for reelection next year, and the primary, which puts candidates from all parties on one ballot, is just nine months away.

(16) comments

Khal Spencer

Running the current GOP clown car in a deep blue state made no sense. If the Republicans had put up a centrist and reasonable candidate, perhaps another Arnold Schwarzenegger, they might have stood a chance by putting up a credible choice against Newsom's obnoxiousness. But I suspect the Larry = Donald label stuck like velcro. I'm not surprised it was a rout.

As far as I am concerned, the GOP is on the Endangered Species List and going the way of the Dodo Bird as far a a credible national political party. The only question is when will states like NC and TX flip blue.

John Cook

Sad day for the crazies. Dealing responsibly with the pandemic was the big R attack. MLG is smiling today.

Russell Scanlon

Thanks for wasting everyone’s time and money Republicans.

Mike Johnson

If the voters in California actually vote to recall him, it will be about his personality and because he is a major league jerk, not about his politics in a state that loves socialism.

Richard Irell

Socialism has an actual meaning. I don’t think you have any idea of what it is 0r you wouldn’t be constantly spewing your nonsense.

Richard Reinders

[thumbdown][thumbdown] socialist don't understand economics, you want this 3.5 trillion social package to go thru, but don't understand the lowest wage earner along with the highest will have to pay the bill , but the rich can afford it. Corporations will get big tax hikes , then they add it to the cost of goods, then the consumer buys the goods paying the tax. Taxing the rich only cost the poor more. Biden is not your or my friend at the rate he is going he will bankrupt the people of this country not help the people.

Lupe Molina

Then you raise wages to increase the purchasing power of each citizen. Looks like you're the one that doesn't understand economics.

Emily Koyama

Lupe's response to you..."then you just raise wages" shows the lack of understanding of basic economics on the left.

Raising wages just creates yet more inflation. Like a dog chasing it's own tail.

It will shut down businesses, create massive unemployment, and plunge the country into recession, or worse. And this time, the government won't be able to bail out the economy because that will just feed the monster....

Richard Reinders

When you raise wages you raise the cost of the product and the lowest wage earner is the most effected, it is a never ending cycle.

Richard Reinders

Lupe if you can tell me one successful socialist country, I will concede , let’s see Cuba no, Venezuela no, North Korea no, Bangladesh no, Sri Lanka no , India no, Guyana no, Sweden abandoned the idea before they collapsed their economy. Watch

Charlotte Rowe

Poor Richard still completely ignorant of the definition of socialism or the fact that he benefits enormously from it.

Khal Spencer

Democratic Socialism? Western European style socialism? Getting away from labels for a minute, the Democratic party is espousing legislation that will significantly expand the social safety net (hence that "s" word) and social services as well as revise the tax code towards higher taxes on those who make more than 400k and raise the capital gains tax rate to a value, from what I recall, that is higher than typical in the EU or G7 or OECD. Whatever label we put on what my fellow Dems are doing (and I prefer to talk about policy rather than labels), I do wish the GOP would make thoughtful commentary on credible alternative choices rather than sounding goofy all the time.

I'm actually all in on reducing the income inequality in the U.S. That said, the devils are always in the details. I don't think we can do it by printing money. We have to figure out how to build an environmentally sustainable economy again that provides useful and financially worthwhile work for everybody. The fifties and sixties ain't coming back.

Russell Scanlon

. . . And while we are dithering over meaningless labels, our roads are crumbling, our bridges are collapsing, etc. etc. An infrastructure bill is being held hostage by one Senator who is apparently owned by the coal industry. We are unable to put together a 10 or 20 year plan to improve our country because of the complete corruption of the political system and the pandering to people’s worst impulses by the mediocre hacks of the Republican Party (and I’m not absolving the Dems either.)

Khal Spencer

A partial tweet from a Twitter-pal: "...One (podcast) host argued that society has gone so mad that it is hard to spot a troll...."

Charlotte Rowe

Mike Johnson, they voted to keep him in office because his policies are better than any rightwad's would be, and Californians understand good leadership. He won by a huge margin. Excellent outcome.

Richard Reinders

The problem Mike is the people that would have voted for Elder left the state and moved to NM , Idaho, Tx and just about anywhere but California.

Welcome to the discussion.

Thank you for joining the conversation on Please familiarize yourself with the community guidelines. Avoid personal attacks: Lively, vigorous conversation is welcomed and encouraged, insults, name-calling and other personal attacks are not. No commercial peddling: Promotions of commercial goods and services are inappropriate to the purposes of this forum and can be removed. Respect copyrights: Post citations to sources appropriate to support your arguments, but refrain from posting entire copyrighted pieces. Be yourself: Accounts suspected of using fake identities can be removed from the forum.