Mixed feelings in El Paso about looser Texas gun limits

Daisy Arvizu, left, participates in a street march in support of immigrant rights last week in El Paso, Texas, amid lingering concerns about gun violence targeting immigrants. She was at work inside a Walmart in El Paso in August 2019 when a gunman killed 23 people, spurring her husband, Martin Portillo, to later to buy a handgun for their protection.

EL PASO, Texas — Martin Portillo got a gun after the mass shooting at a Walmart in his hometown of El Paso two years ago, even though it went against his upbringing.

His wife, Daisy Arvizu, was working at the store when a man started firing — allegedly bent on killing as many Mexicans as he could in the predominantly Latino border city in the state’s western tip, according to authorities. And Portillo felt that getting the handgun and learning how to use it might give him peace of mind and help quiet his wife’s nightmares about the Aug. 3, 2019, attack that killed 23 people and wounded many others.

“I was the first one in my family to get a gun, we never resorted to anything like that,” the 26-year-old cable TV installer said. “It does get to me that I wasn’t there to do something. This is sort of the best I can do.”

On Wednesday, Texas became the 20th and largest state to allow some form of the unregulated carry of a firearm. Under the new law, most people age 21 or older who haven’t been convicted of a felony can carry a holstered handgun — concealed or otherwise — in public without undergoing any training or getting a permit.

Supporters of the law, including Gov. Greg Abbott and his fellow Republicans in the Legislature, laud it as a necessary expansion of the so-called constitutional carry movement that will allow people to more easily defend themselves without government interference.

But critics, including some law enforcement groups and others, say this further loosening of firearms restrictions in a state that has had more than its share of mass shootings is reckless.

Until Wednesday, Texans needed a license to carry a handgun outside of their homes and vehicles. To get one, they had to submit fingerprints, go through several hours of training on gun laws and gun safety, and pass a shooting proficiency test. Now, they can still take an online training course that the law requires the state to provide, but it is not necessary.

The Walmart attack led New Mexico, which is only about 15 miles north of El Paso, to pass a so-called red flag law that allows law enforcement to seize firearms from people who are deemed to pose a danger to themselves or others. According to prosecutors, the man charged in the attack, Patrick Crusius, drove from his Dallas-area home to El Paso so he could target Latinos, who make up about 80 percent of the border city. His lawyers say he was diagnosed with mental disabilities.

Texas, though, has cultivated a strong culture of gun ownership with echoes of the Wild West, and many residents support the loosened restrictions.

Among them is Jesus “Chuy” Aguirre, 78, who owns Chuy’s Gun Shop in El Paso. A generation ago, he successfully advocated for the introduction of concealed handgun permits.

“Eventually we settled down and the cops started understanding what they had to do,” he said.

Angel Zacarius, who at 21 is just old enough to qualify for permitless carry, was at the shop on a recent day asking about the price and quality of a used pistol. He said he didn’t plan to apply for a handgun carry license so that he could save on the fees, which typically run about $200.

But many opposed the new law.

Although it stiffened the penalties for felons getting caught with guns, police groups expressed concern about the scrapped training requirements and about officers being able to safely navigate routine interactions with permitless gun carriers.

Even though Portillo, like many others in El Paso, bought a handgun after the Walmart attack, he said he’s uneasy with the looser requirements to carry one in public and thinks it could lead more gun violence.

“I think that if you are as heavily armed as a police officer, that you need to be actually trained,” said Portillo, a naturalized U.S. citizen who moved as a boy to El Paso from Ciudad Juarez, just across the border with Mexico. “Things escalate, especially nowadays. ... They don’t fight with their fists.”

Adria Gonzalez, who was shopping at the Walmart when the shooting happened and helped guide others to safety, said the new law defies common sense and undermines discipline among gun carriers. She learned how to handle a gun at the urging of her wife, an active-duty member of the military.

“After everything that happened, she said, ‘You know what? You have got to be trained, you have got to be protected,’ ” Gonzalez said.

Dr. Jose Burgos, who was working at University Medical Center when victims of the Walmart attack poured into the emergency room, became a licensed gun owner near the outset of the pandemic out of fear of another attack on Latinos and after seeing the panicked hoarding of household supplies. He believes the rollback of training requirements will lead to unnecessary violence.

“If we have laws that are more permissive of gun ownership, people need to be educated,” he said. “You still have to follow the law that will punish you if you misuse your firearm.”

(12) comments

Peter Romero

Background checks are regulation. I like the idea, we shall see what happens.

Angel Ortiz

High body count. Collateral damage will be high. Human nature and current behavior is not good and now let's hand our weapons. Ludicrous at best

Robert Fields

Just another reason not to travel to or through Texas. As if any more were needed.

Angel Ortiz

Another brilliant idea born from the Texas leadership. They can't control the pandemic and now they are allowing everyone to carry weapons. I would assume that over 50% of those carrying weapons in Tejas will be untrained and the result will be deadly. Once again, one more reason not to live in that state. What a bunch of lunatics. Makes me think twice every time I see a Texas license plate in Santa Fe!!!

Barry Rabkin

The 2nd Amendment doesn’t say anything about training, licensing, or other requirements concerning owning / using / carrying a gun.

Emily Koyama

Opponents of the 2A always use the "well regulated milita" argument to justify piling on the gun control laws, conveniently forgetting that the formation of miltias cannot be done if the ability of the "people" to "keep and bear arms" is permitted without infrigement to start with.

As for whether or not militias will be needed ti defend the Constitution and the Republic in the future? Who knows, Never say never.

Emily Koyama

Correction "infringement"....gotta watch out for the circling typo vultures.

Angel Ortiz

I agree. No language in the 2nd amendment. Ownership and the utilization of a firearm is serious and comes with great responsibility. Just imagine when someone pulls a weapon and accidentally shoots an innocent bystander but I guess you are okay with that possible scenario.

LeRoy Sanchez

Well said.

Emily Koyama

I agree that training should be highly encouraged, and perhaps even provided free....(progressives want government to provide everything else for free).

I think Khal's suggestion to have firearms safety/awareness classes in schools is probably a good idea....but would probably be shot down in favor of climate change and social justice classes.

Khal Spencer

If we want training, teach it in school along with civics.

Khal Spencer

Emily said "I think Khal's suggestion to have firearms safety/awareness classes in schools is probably a good idea....but would probably be shot down in favor of climate change and social justice classes."

I tend to agree, Emily. For example, the activists came out with torches and pitchforks to ban any NRA contributions to high school rifle teams here and elsewhere, even though the NRA firearms safety side of the house is probably the best equipped to teach firearms safety.


My senior year English teacher, Mr. Glen Weeks, was also our rifle team and rifle club instructor and coach. Many in my rural school had already taken Hunter Safety Class but those who did not were able to learn a lot about safe firearms handling.

After all, if we teach civics and English to help people use their voting and 1A rights, why not teach them to safely exercise their 2A rights? Seems there are those opposed to students learning to be critical thinkers as well as good shooters, eh?

Welcome to the discussion.

Thank you for joining the conversation on Santafenewmexican.com. Please familiarize yourself with the community guidelines. Avoid personal attacks: Lively, vigorous conversation is welcomed and encouraged, insults, name-calling and other personal attacks are not. No commercial peddling: Promotions of commercial goods and services are inappropriate to the purposes of this forum and can be removed. Respect copyrights: Post citations to sources appropriate to support your arguments, but refrain from posting entire copyrighted pieces. Be yourself: Accounts suspected of using fake identities can be removed from the forum.