By: Michael Wade Simpson Published online: Friday, February 17, 2012 Appeared in: Pasateimpo
Share this review
More film reviews
LimitlessOne Chile: Bradley Cooper plays Eddie, a man
who is given a drug that allows him to unlock his
brain’s full potential. A powerful mogul (Robert
De Niro) finds Eddie and attempts to coerce him into
arrangin ...
Something BorrowedTwo Chiles: Single lawyer Rachel (Ginnifer
Goodwin) has a crush on her law-school buddy Dex (Colin Egglesfield),
who's also the fiancé of her lifelong BFF Darcy (Kate Hudson,
alarmingly good as an obnoxiou ...
SafeNo Review: A 10-year-old girl (Catherine Chan) in New York
City knows a secret code given to her by the Chinese
mafia, and now they want her dead — as do the
Russian mafia and a gang of corrupt cops. A was ...
Inside JobThree chiles: Director Charles Ferguson’s
(No End in Sight) Academy Award-
winning documentary may not offer the
blood and guts found in other films, but it presents
its own brand of carnage in dealing with t ...
CourageousNo Review: In 2008, the modest hit Fireproof
showed us how Christianity could augment the life
of a firefighter. Director Alex Kendrick follows that
film with Courageous, a movie about how Christianity
improves ...
Capsule review
Wim Wenders, the German
filmmaker known for Wings of Desire
and Paris, Texas, has created a stunning
documentary about choreographer Pina Bausch, who
died suddenly in 2009. The film, nominated for an
Academy Award in the Documentary Feature category,
uses 3-D technology in a surprising way. Instead
of taking you on a thrill ride, the director uses the
broadening of the senses that the extra-dimensional
technique offers to draw you into Bausch’s dances
and to create intimacy that sometimes borders on
the extreme. Rated PG. 103 minutes. In various
languages with subtitles. Screens in 3-D only.
Wim Wenders, the German filmmaker known for
works such as Wings of Desire and Paris, Texas,
has created a stunning documentary about the
choreographer Pina Bausch, who died suddenly
in 2009. The film, nominated for an Academy
Award in the Documentary Feature category,
uses 3-D technology in a surprising way. Instead
of taking you on a thrill ride with dancing, the
director uses the broadening of the senses that
the extra-dimensional technique offers to draw
you into Bausch’s dances, to create intimacy that
sometimes borders on the extreme.
In Bausch’s particular movement language,
wrought with male-female conflict, often at the
edges between sensuality and violence, what may
not be spectacularly technical, dance-wise, is often
deeply felt. Wenders, who was a friend of Bausch’s
and had begun working with the choreographer
on the project, understood and appreciated this.
His film documents the details, letting dancers
recount asides the choreographer would offer that
changed their lives, and then takes things macro
— expanding the possibilities of filmed dance
by breaking out of the bounds of the rehearsal
hall and performance settings and taking dance
sequences out into the world. It’s a performance
as much as it is a documentary.
Just as the footage of all those von Trapp kids
singing and dancing through the sites of Salzburg
turned a silly Rodgers and Hammerstein musical
into a cinematic event, Wenders has Bausch
company dancers all over the troupe’s hometown
of Wuppertal, Germany, strangely gesturing
on escalators, marching through public plazas,
throwing themselves onto banks of mining refuse,
and performing romantic interludes, clad in
evening gowns and suits, on traffic medians
at rush hour. Every sequence has its own logic,
every location an oddness that works. Every
uncomfortable juxtaposition of grace and ugliness
seems to match, sometimes eerily, the ideas for
which Bausch became famous. Even the floating
trams of Wuppertal’s Schwebebahn mass-transit
system hang on their tracks and swish gracefully
over the river Wupper, becoming players in
Wenders’ Bausch-like dance.
Of course, some of the footage belongs indoors.
Early in the film, Wenders parks his camera in
the dirt. A stage is carefully covered in peat for
a production of her 1975 version of The Rite of
Spring. Perhaps because Bausch’s choreography
is rarely about what the feet and legs are doing,
Wenders comes in close to hands and torsos, lips,
eyes, mouths, and hair. As Stravinsky’s haunting
music plays in the background, Wenders’ camera
is so much a part of the action that you can see and
hear the filmy material of a prone female dancer’s
costume pass over her skin, her fingers moving
through soil, her breath a ragged contrast to the
music, her face already smudged with fear.
This dance is about rape and ritual sacrifice, and
a gang of sweaty bodies becoming stained with
earth seems not only appropriate but inevitable.
Bausch’s later works moved away from such a
strong group dynamic, becoming linked vignettes,
often with striking scenic elements such as water,
leaves, thousands of red carnations, or grass.
There were strings of solos with interruptions,
and images that were repetitious, like dreams
(and often as indecipherable). Wenders’ decision
to place an extended sequence of Rite of Spring
near the beginning of the film brings you into her
art in the most visceral way.
Later, things veer monotonously into the abstract.
Long sequences from Café Müller (1978) feature
women gesturing with their eyes closed in a café
littered with tables and chairs. Wenders may be
trying to describe the choreographer’s thematic
obsessions (Bausch’s parents owned an inn, and she
is shown dancing in early productions of the piece),
but images of bodies slumped against walls and over
tables are about as exciting as you would expect.
As a documentarian, Wenders has a certain
magical disdain for tradition. Instead of talking
heads, he offers slow, static close-up shots of
dancers’ faces, with their thoughts offered later in
voice-overs. Bausch’s choreographic method was
to involve the dancers’ deepest emotions. One
dancer describes Bausch asking him to exemplify
pure joy. The group sequence that follows is a
party of disco moves — devoid of modern-dance
cliché. “All her dances were about love and pain,”
says another. Aging doesn’t seem to be an issue
in her company, and one of the veteran members
describes with pride how being an old dancer
opened up possibilities for her, at least in
Bausch’s world.
Bausch’s voice is heard early in the film, saying
that there are situations that leave you utterly
speechless in life and that dance comes in where
words end. “Dance, dance,” her voice returns at
the end of the film. “Otherwise, we are lost.”
Wenders’ film wonderfully captures the essence
of a choreographer’s aesthetic, and meets her
creativity in an artist’s way, which is the ultimate
sign of respect.