Quantcast

Our view: New copper rules don’t protect water

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, April 6, 2013 11:00 pm | Updated: 12:41 am, Sun Apr 7, 2013.

The 2009 New Mexico Legislature and former Gov. Bill Richardson were correct in deciding that the state needs more consistent rules regulating groundwater affected by copper mines. Senate Bill 206, passed by that Legislature and signed by Gov. Richardson, requires the state to adopt regulations to make clear how to manage groundwater that copper mines impact.

Fast forward to 2013. We have a different governor and different appointees working at the New Mexico Environment Department. The rules, designed to bring certainty, have been developed after eight months of hearings among the state, mining interests and environmental groups. The proposed rules have gone from the Environment Department to the Water Quality Control Commission, with hearings scheduled to start Tuesday. For anyone who cares about the state of groundwater — that is, the water underground, source of drinking water for many — these hearings are crucial.

Subscription Required

An online service is needed to view this article in its entirety. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login Now

Need an online subscription?

Subscribe

Login

You must login to view the full content on this page.

Thank you for reading 5 free articles on our site. You can come back at the end of your 30-day period for another 5 free articles, or you can get complete access to the online edition for $2.49 a week. If you need help, please contact our office at 505-986-3010 You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login Now

Need an online subscription?

Subscribe

Login

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 No Alias Commenters must use their real names.
  • 2 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
  • 3 Don't Threaten or Abuse. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. and please turn off caps lock.
  • 4 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.

Welcome to the discussion.

1 comment:

  • Philip Taccetta posted at 8:19 am on Sun, Apr 7, 2013.

    PhiltheElder Posts: 188

    The loss or destruction of potable water anywhere, especially in the southwest is totally unacceptable. The extractive industries have to provide the best protection for our surface and groundwater that technology has to offer at whatever the cost. They make obscene profits - they can afford to protect our water. Once the water is screwed, it's a lot harder to unscrew it!
    It doesn't deter business to have strict regulations - they want the product and the profits - the cost of protecting our water is negligible in that context.

     

Write us! We welcome opinions from the readers. Send either letters (150 words) or My Views (600 words) to letters@sfnewmexican.com.

You can write a letter once a month or one My View every three months. We require the letter writer's name, address and phone number to be considered for publication. We also encourage writers to include a photo of themselves.

Any questions? Call Letters Editor Jennifer West at 986-3063.

Today’s New Mexican, July 24, 2014

To view a replica of today's printed edition of The Santa Fe New Mexican, you must be a subscriber. Get complete access to the online edition, including the print replica, at our low rate of $2.49 a week. That's about the price of a cup of coffee. Or get online and home delivery of our print edition for $3.24. Click here for details.  

Advertisement