Quantcast

Audit: Quake could collapse nuke facility

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Thursday, June 27, 2013 8:00 pm | Updated: 11:58 pm, Thu Jun 27, 2013.

An audit report released by the U.S. Department of Energy renews concerns about vulnerabilities from natural disasters at Los Alamos National Laboratory and calls attention to the possibility that the lab’s plutonium facility could collapse in a large earthquake, risking workers’ lives and threatening off-site radioactive exposures well above acceptable limits.

Additionally, LANL’s fire prevention and protection systems are suspected of deficiencies in the event that a future wildfire should reach Area G, where low-level nuclear waste is disposed and more than 5,600 containers of transuranic waste are still stored provisionally in fabric-covered domes.

Subscription Required

An online service is needed to view this article in its entirety. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login Now

Need an online subscription?

Subscribe

Login

You must login to view the full content on this page.

Thank you for reading 5 free articles on our site. You can come back at the end of your 30-day period for another 5 free articles, or you can get complete access to the online edition for $2.49 a week. If you need help, please contact our office at 505-986-3010 You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login Now

Need an online subscription?

Subscribe

Login

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 No Alias Commenters must use their real names.
  • 2 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
  • 3 Don't Threaten or Abuse. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. and please turn off caps lock.
  • 4 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.

Welcome to the discussion.

3 comments:

  • Joe Savoldi posted at 6:37 pm on Fri, Jun 28, 2013.

    joesavoldi Posts: 20

    I think Los Alamos is much too dangerous for too many. Now would be a good time for thousands of Santa Feans to move away from this danger zone. California sounds good. Lots of people there with similar views as many folks in Santa Fe. Join the free-tibet-save-the-whale crowd. Peace.

    joe in Espa

     
  • Joseph Hempfling posted at 11:50 am on Fri, Jun 28, 2013.

    joehempfling Posts: 188

    Hasn't anyone heard of the PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPAL and that is, when in doubt, to err on the side of "precaution" and NOT later TREATMENT which is often too late and overly costly. My bet that business as usual will mean this report will be put on a shelf to gather dust until which time another pending catastrophe happens, like another Conchas Fire which almost burned Area G despite the so called official denials ! Talk to the local residents up there and ask them !! Next time we may not be so lucky. Act now and which means more than just lip service. And perhaps most importantly CLOSE THE PLACE DOWN and re-commission LANL with a PEACE MISSION to benefit everyone and the planet. TRY IT YOU MAY LIKE IT !!

     
  • Steve Salazar posted at 9:42 am on Fri, Jun 28, 2013.

    Steve Salazar Posts: 871

    There's lots of firebreaks between for forests and Area G.

    An earthquake will collapse PF-4, quick we need the CMRR to be built.

     

Follow The Santa Fe New Mexican

Today’s New Mexican, July 23, 2014

To view a replica of today's printed edition of The Santa Fe New Mexican, you must be a subscriber. Get complete access to the online edition, including the print replica, at our low rate of $2.49 a week. That's about the price of a cup of coffee. Or get online and home delivery of our print edition for $3.24. Click here for details.  

Advertisement