Clerk defends denial of same-sex marriage license

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 6:20 pm | Updated: 11:38 am, Thu Jul 25, 2013.

Santa Fe County Clerk Geraldine Salazar says the same-sex couple asking the New Mexico Supreme Court to force her to issue them a marriage license are going about it the wrong way.

Salazar’s response to Alexander Hanna and Yon Hudson’s petition for a writ of mandamus says the state constitution limits such direct petitions to the Supreme Court to cases against state officers, boards and commissions.

Subscription Required

An online service is needed to view this article in its entirety. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login Now

Need an online subscription?



You must login to view the full content on this page.

Thank you for reading 5 free articles on our site. You can come back at the end of your 30-day period for another 5 free articles, or you can get complete access to the online edition for $2.49 a week. If you need help, please contact our office at 505-986-3010 You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login Now

Need an online subscription?



Rules of Conduct

  • 1 No Alias Commenters must use their real names.
  • 2 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
  • 3 Don't Threaten or Abuse. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. and please turn off caps lock.
  • 4 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • Khal Spencer posted at 12:58 pm on Wed, Jul 31, 2013.

    Khal Spencer Posts: 418

    I tend to agree with Mr. Salazar. Rather than putting the Clerk into the crossfire, this needs to go to the courts and be settled once and for all.

  • Francisco Carbajal posted at 11:26 am on Mon, Jul 29, 2013.

    FranciscoCarbajal Posts: 222

    I think the current Santa Fe County Clerk and the Santa Fe County Attorney's Office are doing an excellent job! In regards to US Supreme Court recent ruling relating to same-sex marriage, the Santa Fe County Commission should stay clear away from proposing any resolution to support it! This issue is too culturally sensitive for Santa Fe County and it is not in the best interests of the citizenary. The fact remains the same-sex marriage issue has no legal clout in Santa Fe County and a proposed resolution to support it by Commission Stephanics will not make a difference in it anyways. Certainly, it will cause more division and separation in our Northern NM communties, including Santa Fe County. In terms of the City of Santa Fe recent decision to pass a non-enforceable resolution supporting this matter, it was a big mistake. The Mayor and the City Attorney do not respresent anybody but themselves. It is all about grandstanding and political movidas that makes it a personal agenda item for both of them and they know it. And in the next Mayor's and City Council election in 2014, let's see what happens with this same-sex marriage stuff? BTW, "it is not the will of the people that all people should be afforded the same rights relating to marriage" in New Mexico either! I do agree that in two larger urban cities in NM, a small fraction of the population do support it; however, in rural NM communities, villages, pueblos,etc., it is not so true. I for one, cannot support a homsexual man telling me he deserves to have the same equal rights as a father, dad, husband, and/or grandfather like me. It ain't going to happen in my life time. Of course, this is my opinion and I owned up to it regardless on what others may say or disagree. Boundaries are made for a reason and maybe it is better for the same-sex marriage advocates to learn not to infringe thier agenda on others in Santa Fe County, including Northern NM.

  • mark mocha posted at 7:47 am on Fri, Jul 26, 2013.

    brnfre47 Posts: 210

    What tactics are referring to? Asking for equal treatment as any tax paying citizen would? Hiring a lawyer to help them petition the courts? Peacefully demonstrate? Avoid name calling? Provide statistics that show same sex parents have less instances of child abuse? Less instances of infidelity? Are usually more sound financially? Those tactics? The ones called the truth? I was unaware that telling the truth was a tactic. I always thought it was what good citizens do. My bad.

  • Nena Roberts posted at 10:50 pm on Thu, Jul 25, 2013.

    Nena Posts: 30

    Wow. My comment was removed. I proved my point.

  • mark mocha posted at 3:50 pm on Thu, Jul 25, 2013.

    brnfre47 Posts: 210

    I learn something new every day.

  • Steve Salazar posted at 10:12 am on Thu, Jul 25, 2013.

    Steve Salazar Posts: 878

    The only qualification required is that you get more votes than the other candidates. She won a popular election, after all.

  • mark mocha posted at 10:04 am on Thu, Jul 25, 2013.

    brnfre47 Posts: 210

    So, the county clerks qualifications for interpreting the law is that she has a BA is sociology and is a licensed real estate broker. Not meaning to "browbeat" the clerk but it would seem to me that there should be more qualifications for a job such as this, for a position where interpreting the law is part of your job description. I have a masters in Psychology, can I have the job? And FYI, sometimes common decency and doing the right thing is in direct opposition to the law at hand.

  • Steve Salazar posted at 9:35 am on Thu, Jul 25, 2013.

    Steve Salazar Posts: 878

    Is browbeating a county clerk really the way to effect change? No, what really needs to happen is that a couple needs to get denied, they sue, the case gets to the Supreme Court, where the Constitutionality of the law is decided. If the law is Constitutional, you are SOL, if it's not, the law will have to be re-written.

  • Tracy Lopez posted at 7:59 am on Thu, Jul 25, 2013.

    TDL Posts: 5

    And who's asking for sympathy?

  • Tracy Lopez posted at 7:58 am on Thu, Jul 25, 2013.

    TDL Posts: 5

    Above the law? And punished? LOL....seriously. Please explain.

    I think they should stop paying city, county and state taxes until they have equal treatment and rights just like EVERY heterosexual has, just like I do.

    Hanna and Hudson, please don't stop. Take it all the way up and then sue the hell out fo the state, it's worth it!!

    The Supreme Court already made it's decision, now GO FOR IT!!

  • mark mocha posted at 7:49 am on Thu, Jul 25, 2013.

    brnfre47 Posts: 210

    The "gay movement?" This is not about some movement. This is about the constitution and about equal rights for all. This is what the 60's was all about. remember.... equal rights for minorities, women..... stuff that is in our constitution but people tend to overlook it when it comes to certain people. We are all equal under the law and should have the same rights as everyone else. Thats what that flag stands for, thats what it represents. So, if she were following the law she would treat that couple the same as every other couple that applies for a license. And sympathies have nothing to do with it. It's time we as a people started living up to what that flag represents, that flag that defines us as a people, that flag that is a beacon of hope to millions around the world ...... and it doesn't represent unequal treatment, locked borders, racial discrimination or any other type of oppression. It represents freedom.

  • mark mocha posted at 5:33 am on Thu, Jul 25, 2013.

    brnfre47 Posts: 210

    What is with these elected officials and department heads in this state. First the head of Human Services refuses to hand over an audit PAID FOR WITH MY TAX DOLLARS. And so is her salary for that matter. Then the County Clerk refuses to issue a marriage license because according to her it was done incorrectly. Unbelievable. Oh, she's not biased against gays. Right. She has gay friends. Marched in the pride parade. That's like saying "I have black friends". Peoples. You are elected by and paid by the people of this state, not God and certainly not by a private trust fund so DO THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE. Any law student will tell you that Roe v Wade was incorrect, an anomaly. Never should have made the supreme court. It was a state issue BUT it was and still is the will of the people and so it stands .... rightly. So it is with gay marriage. It is the will of the people that all people should be afforded the same rights. So, afford them.


Follow The Santa Fe New Mexican

Today’s New Mexican, July 27, 2014

To view a replica of today's printed edition of The Santa Fe New Mexican, you must be a subscriber. Get complete access to the online edition, including the print replica, at our low rate of $2.49 a week. That's about the price of a cup of coffee. Or get online and home delivery of our print edition for $3.24. Click here for details.