Looming questions: Legislator will consider Block impeachment
| The New Mexican
Posted: Wednesday, April 08, 2009
- 4/9/09
     
   Print   |   Font Size:    

Related Items






advertisement
While a defiant Jerome Block Jr. said he will remain on the Public Regulation Commission, a number of what-ifs loom should he change his mind or be forced to step down.

He hasn't been convicted, let alone arraigned, and at least a couple of his fellow commissioners are in wait-and-see mode.

"This is an issue that the commissioners are concerned about, but at the same time they have to let the legal process continue," PRC spokesman Paul Carbajal said.

A Republican state lawmaker said Wednesday that he will consider introducing impeachment proceedings against Block if the commissioner is still in office in late August or early September, when the Legislature is expected to convene for a special session.

"We have to look at it," said Rep. Larry Larrañaga of Albuquerque. "We are all given a rap for being politicians, and we all get painted with the same broad brush."

In 2005, Larrañaga introduced similar impeachment proceedings against then-state Treasurer Michael Vigil, who resigned just as lawmakers were preparing articles of impeachment.

In the Block case, he said, "I might just do it, but we'll see where the process is when we return."

Should Block's seat become vacant before his term ends, it would be up to the governor to pick a replacement. The appointment would be "for a term ending December 31 after the next general election, at which election a person shall be elected to fill any remained of the unexpired term," a state statute says.

Block Jr. would lose his seat if convicted of a felony, according to state law, because a felony conviction removes a person's right to vote and officeholders must be registered to vote.

Gov. Bill Richardson's office declined to comment Wednesday on Block's indictment.

At the PRC, Carbajal said, "At some point, there will be some kind of looking at the situation and doing what's best for the integrity of the commission."

What could come from that remains murky.

Carbajal said the Office of the General Counsel, the PRC's legal department, can recommend action against a commissioner who violates a law that the commission governs. But in this case, the office "has no reason" to believe Block violated any such law. The PRC's job is to regulate utilities, telecommunications, insurance and other industries.

The PRC adopted an ethics code in 2006, after prior scandals involving former commissioners David King, E. Shirley Baca and Eric Serna.






You must register with a valid email address and use your real first-and-last name to comment on this forum. Once you've logged into the system, you'll be able to contribute comments. If you need help logging in or establishing your new user name and password, please write us.For information on our community guidelines and updating your username to meet standards, visit http://sfnm.co/sfnmforum.

All users are expected to abide by the forum rules and and be courteous to other users. Comments can be accepted up to eight days following publication. After that, comments can be read but no new submissions made. Send questions to webeditor@sfnewmexican.com

IMPORTANT: Comments must be posted under your own full, real name. Anonymous comments and those posted under a pseudonym can be removed. Please consult the forum rules. If you have questions, e-mail webeditor@sfnewmexican.com.
comments powered by Disqus




advertisement
advertisement
"));