MarketSpace Classifieds:
Jobs
Cars
Real Estate
Merchandise
Your browser does not support iframes.
Home
News
Sports
Opinion
Pasatiempo
Community
Visitors
Calendar
Obituaries
Photos
Video
TV / Movies
Subscribers
Help
Santa Fe News Links:
Roundhouse Roundup
Green Chile Chatter
Police notes
News briefs
Business
Columns
La Voz
Santa Fe Sports Links:
Grammer School blog
The Read Barron blog
Prep
NFL
MLB
NASCAR
NBA
Golf
Popular Links:
Santa Fe News
Santa Fe Sports
Police Notes
Columns
Neighbors
Teen
eTaste
Scoop
Green Line
La Voz
Archives
ORVs' impact, damage extends way beyond trails
Valerie Gremillion, Ph.D
Posted: Sunday, April 19, 2009
- 4/19/09
Comments
Story Tools
Font Size:
Facebook
Twitter
Print story
Get FREE Daily Headlines by email!
advertisement
Upcoming Earth Day, April 22, is a time for us to celebrate the beauty and benefits we receive from Earth and its ecosystems. Whether you hike, ride, fish, hunt, or just enjoy magnificent views, Earth Day is a good time to ponder the effects of our actions on the ecological networks which support our lives in New Mexico.
In 2008, the Santa Fe National Forest released its Travel Management proposed action. Its purpose: To regulate forest-damaging off-road vehicles, including motorcycles and all-terrain vehicles. The April 12 My View, "Do the math: OHVers not asking for much" by Joanne Spivak gave an entirely false impression of the impact of 600 miles of proposed motorcycle-only trails.
Contrary to Ms. Spivak's math, those 600 miles of trails do not affect only 220 acres. Instead, motorized trails impact forest health and function, as well as the enjoyment of recreationists who seek nature's peace and tranquility.
Let's look at specific examples, and "do the math" in a realistic way.
For instance, in the broader case of all motorized trails 'proposed open' on the west side of the Santa Fe National Forest, the New Mexico Department of Game and Fish determined that, using Forest Service definitions, a 200-meter zone on either side of each motorized route resulted in a loss of roughly 264,000 acres of effective habitat for mule deer and elk.
Applying this 200-meter zone to the 600 miles of motorcycle routes: 200m = 656 feet; x2 for both sides of the trail; gives us a "loss of effective habitat" section across a motorcycle trail of 1,312 feet. Times 5,280 feet per mile, that yields 6.9 million square feet, or 158 acres, of effective habitat lost for each mile of motorcycle trail (43,560 sq. feet per acre). The loss of effective habitat for 600 miles of motorcycle trail is therefore almost 95,000 acres — not the "absurdly tiny" 220 acres Ms. Spivak erroneously claims.
The issue looms larger when calculating the noise impact of 600 miles of motorcycle trails. Research documented in the official SJM40 report found that ORV noise can travel more than a mile, disrupting wildlife and everyone seeking forest quiet. Using less than one-third of a mile on either side of the trail (500 meters, 1,640 feet), we get a "noise cross section" for a motorcycle trail of 3,280 feet. For one mile of trail (5,280 feet), the math shows us that at least 398 acres are disturbed by the "noise footprint: of a single mile of motorcycle trail.
The sounds of motorcycle engines over the requested 600 miles of trail, therefore, disturb game and hunters, birds and birdwatchers, hikers and horseback riders across at least 239,000 acres. That's 15 percent of the Santa Fe National Forest — a far cry from Ms. Spivak's estimate of "0.000142 of the land."
We are all free to enjoy the beauty and majesty of our national forests, wilderness, and wildlife. But with that freedom comes a direct responsibility — to reality-based management of our forests so that we, and future New Mexicans, can continue to enjoy their quiet beauty.
Valerie Gremillion, Ph.D, is a Research Assistant Professor at UNM Albuquerque and a co-author of the SJM40 report, found at http://www.emnrd.state.nm.us/main/sjm40/SJM40report-01-07-09.pdf.
You must register with a valid email address and your real name to comment on this forum. Previous usernames are no longer valid as of Feb. 5. Once you've logged into the system, you'll be able to view and contribute comments. If you need help logging in or establishing your new user name and password, please
visit this tutorial
.
All users are expected to abide by the
forum rules
and and be courteous to other users. Comments can be accepted up to eight days following publication. After that, comments can be read but no new submissions made. Send questions to
webeditor@sfnewmexican.com
View the discussion thread.
blog comments powered by
Disqus
Feb. 3 Live blog archive
Alleged display of nude pics draws fire
Live blog archive: Feb. 8, 2010
As another movie shoots around Santa Fe,
debate continues on incentives
Police: Injured toddler may lose his legs
Live blog archive:Feb. 4, 2010
Drivers' snow fatigue is boarders' bliss
Spirit of Santa Fe: City has always been a crossroads for adventurers
Legislature 2010: New garage has plenty of vacancies as state workers campaign to nix fees
N.M. Supreme Court halts White Peak land swap
Coming Soon!
advertisement
View latest comments >>
Powered by Disqus