Your
story about possible litigation against Gov. Susana Martínez by members
of the Legislature indicated that the state Supreme Court had ruled
against her administration twice: once concerning ouster of Public
Employee Labor Relations Board members and once concerning publication
of a greenhouse-gas regulation. In fact, the ruling requiring
publication of the regulation was announced at a January hearing on the
lawsuit filed by the New Mexico Environmental Law Center for New Energy
Economy. Those are not the only Supreme Court rulings against the
administration.
In January, the
court ruled in another case filed by our office that the administration
had to publish a regulation governing groundwater pollution caused by
dairies. Later, the administration agreed, in response to a similar
lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club, to publish the green building codes
adopted by the Construction Industries Commission. The Supreme Court has
ruled against the Martínez administration three times.
Douglas Meiklejohn
executive director
New Mexico Environmental Law Center
Santa Fe
Still cavemen
Regarding
your May 19 article, "Conservation groups call for trapping ban on
N.M. public lands": I, too, am in full support of such a ban. Trapping
is a biologically unsound practice. The thought that for $20 I can buy
my license and then set as many traps as I want and kill or maim as many
animals as I want just makes me cringe. The fact that our governor has
her "Small Business Task Force" working on this issue makes my head
spin.
Our state's wildlife is a
treasure for all of us to enjoy and should in no way be exploited for
the sake of small businesses! This is the 21st century. Let's begin to
act like we've learned something along the way.
Cindy Roper
Cerrillos
Enter drug biz
The
U.S. could buy the entire poppy crop in Afghanistan for more than the
Taliban pays, put the Afghan warlords on our side and break the economy
of the Taliban. A U.S. pharmaceutical company could be the world's
supplier of legal medicinal narcotics, making an incidental profit and
giving Afghanistan a legitimate industry. We could then hire the Taliban
as our agricultural agents. This would cost less than 1 percent of the
cost of the war in Afghanistan, with many fewer casualties.
Leaving
Afghanistan with no local industry guarantees the success of the
Taliban, which offers to reinstate the drug trade as its middlemen and
fund terrorism. No government in Afghanistan can stop this by force
because the people of Afghanistan are not interested in destroying their
greatest natural resource.
Rufus Clay
Los Alamos
Don't touch uranium
In
a state where there is so much sun and wind, we should devote our
money and expertise to the development of solar and wind power, and to
electromagnetic energy use -- period! We shouldn't allow our state's
uranium to be mined! With the knowledge of what uranium mining can do to
the land, and eventually to all the life around it, and what can
happen in the event of earthquakes and fires to nuclear facilities, we
should be deeply ashamed to even entertain the thought of continuing to
use nuclear energy.
Those who want to
mine uranium at all costs are just like those who want to drill for oil
at all costs. Companies like Uranium Resources Inc. are only interested
in making huge profits; they don't care if the entire planet goes up
in a mushroom cloud, as long as they have enough money to own mansions,
vacation on private islands, fly in private jets and wear $20,000
watches.
Ramona von Moritz
Santa Fe