Do not be seduced by false promises and costly changes that might cause
our fragile medical system to further unravel and cause a real
health-delivery crisis in New Mexico. We do not need to create a new
program just for political reasons. New Mexicans should not be used to
further anyone's political aspirations. We now stand at the brink of
decision making that could change the organized financing and delivery
of medical care for the future of New Mexico.
State government has spent millions of your dollars hiring a
national consultant to study the issue and now has disregarded the
results. After ignoring the costly analysis, Gov. Bill Richardson is
championing a plan which promises to do something for everybody, while
asking everyone to give up a little for the benefit of all.
Many other health care reform plans are also being proposed by
legislators and citizen groups. Like the governor's plan, they leave a
lot of unanswered questions.
Who are the uninsured anyway? What gives government the right to
make health decisions for the individual citizens of New Mexico? Do
elected legislators who are realtors, lawyers, teachers, ranchers,
bankers, housewives and retirees know more than you about your needs
and wants for health care?
While Gov. Bill Richardson's bill does not yet exist, legislators
are being asked to embrace it. He did publish 10 pages of questions and
answers about his plan; however, many of the suppositions in the
answers are questionable and even misleading.
In fairness, his reform plan is still a work in progress. That is
why there is still no bill. To his credit, his staff continues to meet
with those dissenting in their comments about the proposed legislation.
The major problem most opponents see in the governor's plan is the
power given to a health care authority, which will control the practice
of medicine in the state. All control of delivery and reimbursement
will lie with a group under control of the governor — whoever that
might be!
This is in contrast to the reform bill known as the Health Security
Act, picked by the state-hired national consultant as the plan most
likely to deliver cost control and universal coverage for all New
Mexicans. It calls for change that many feel is too radical —
socialized medicine! Loss of freedom to choose! Poor quality government
health care! Lack of services and long waits for care! Providers
fleeing the state! These are just a few of the inflammatory
descriptions of the results of such a plan. In reality it does none of
those things. I see it closer to a co-op created by the government, but
run by the private sector, carefully phased in. As we look at the
history of mankind, the real reformations have never been peaceful or
harmonious.
I predict that the 2008 session of the New Mexico Legislature will
not be peaceful nor harmonious, so maybe true reformation will occur.
But, remember it is an election year, and the entire state Senate and
House are up for re-election. Add to that a U.S. Senate race and three
U.S. House races and I predict more rhetoric, little change and much
posturing to woo the electorate to return incumbents to office and
elect new politicians to open seats. Perhaps it is time to hold our
federal leaders' feet to the fire to get real reform on a national
level so all Americans can benefit from health care reform. In the
meantime, I suggest we use the programs that already exist in the
state, but are not fully enrolled. Change is not needed to cover the
uninsured! The uninsured are currently eligible for
already-existing health care programs.
Let us utilize state programs that will actually cover all
uninsured in New Mexico if properly administered: State Coverage
Insurance; State Employers Coverage Insurance; Health Insurance
Alliance; New Mexico Medical Insurance Pool and NewMexiKids. I pray my
fellow legislators will remember there are three branches of government
so there will be checks and balances. Each branch has the right to have
opinions, but legislation requires a consensus. The governor can and
does veto what the legislators do. We must remain autonomous in doing
what we feel is right for our constituents, not for a special interest
or fellow politician. When I became a physician I pledged to "first, do
no harm." When legislators deal with health care involving the life and
death of our citizens, the unintended consequences of legislation
becomes much more dangerous: "First, so no harm!"
State Sen. Steve Komadina, R-Corrales, sits on the Health and Human
Services Committee. He is a medical doctor with an OB-GYN and wellness
practice in Corrales.
You must register with a valid email address and use your real name to comment on this forum. Previous usernames are no longer valid as of Feb. 5. Once you've logged into the system, you'll be able to contribute comments. If you need help logging in or establishing your new user name and password, please visit this tutorial.
All users are expected to abide by the forum rules and and be courteous to other users. Comments can be accepted up to eight days following publication. After that, comments can be read but no new submissions made. Send questions to webeditor@sfnewmexican.com
IMPORTANT: Comments must be posted under your own full, real name. Anonymous comments and those posted under a pseudonym can be removed. Please consult the forum rules. If you have questions, e-mail webeditor@sfnewmexican.com.