And as some of the national press pointed out, that can't hurt our governor if -- as the public-opinion polls continue to say -- she, not he, becomes the Democratic candidate and, in January of 2009, president.
But the governor's gallantry aside, it's hard to fault Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, and former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards, for trying to flush out Clinton on issues around which she continues to dance.
At Tuesday's debate at
Obama properly accused her of changing positions whenever she figures it's politically convenient. He went on to point out that the Republicans would have a field day with her flakiness -- so she'd better confront issues, from the war in Iraq to driver's licenses for folks illegally in New York, now, while she's in gentler confines than those where she'd find herself next fall if she's the nominee.
Democratic primary voters and caucus attendees deserve a clear view of her stands; as for general-election voters, ni hablar.
Both Obama and Edwards are young enough for later
presidential runs -- so common sense should tell them to take it easy attacking
someone whose help they might need down the road. But at the same time, Clinton
needs reminding that politics is a rough sport to which she should become more
accustomed; the sooner the better. She holds a lead many are calling
insurmountable -- but she hasn't yet been crowned No. 4 in what's shaping up as
an alternating dynasty of
As for
Tuesday -- and there were flashbacks to his cool,
casual and competent appearance at a February forum in
There's a chance, however slight, that his
personal diplomacy, along with an impressive record as diplomatic
troubleshooter in some of the world's hotter spots, might yet strike a nerve in