This week I pulled out of my mailbox a video entitled Obsession. Apparently, it's being sent to every registered voter in swing states. It is a series of clips of anti-Islamic-related material, and the purpose of it is to engender mindless and irrational fear. Produced and paid for by the Clarion Project, this month alone, 28 million videos have been distributed.
Clarion is a 501(c)3 ( think SwiftBoating), and is legally prohibited from endorsing a candidate, even by implication. This video is clearly being used to influence a political campaign, and is now the subject of a lawsuit. Clarion had to remove an endorsement of McCain from its Web site. At the end of the video, it is stated, "Use this as your voting guide when you go into the voting booth on election day." I will. I will vote for real change, against lying, hatemongering John McCain.
Barbara Bruneau Cleaver
Santa Fe
At last I understand what a "community organizer" is. Barack Obama worked as a community organizer for the organization ACORN. His job was to train people to shake down and intimidate banking executives to give favorable loans to otherwise unqualified applicants. This practice contributed to the current financial meltdown we are experiencing. Your average New Mexican letter writer may be looking forward to the promised Marxist utopia under Obama, but I and most Americans aren't.
Leon Romero
Santa Fe
On Sept. 18, Sen. Barack Obama made a historic and successful visit to Española. Northern New Mexico is a pivotal area in a battleground state that may determine the outcome of this high-stakes election. Despite a very warm day and long wait, Obama did not disappoint. His remarks before a crowd of 10,000-plus were about the unfolding financial crisis.
He also sent a message to Northern New Mexico and Hispanic voters at large — "Flex your muscles"! In other words, get out and vote your numbers. Great message! I was very proud to host this memorable event and provide a brief welcome. I want to thank our city staff who helped prepare our city for the event; all law-enforcement agencies that provided security; emergency personnel who responded to almost 40 heat-related medical situations; and the Obama campaign team. Que viva Obama!
Joseph M. Maestas
Española mayor
Chris Rock really cut to the chase when he stated on CNN: "It's simple, vote for the guy with one house." Barack Obama owns one house and one car, but according to Newsweek, John McCain owns at least seven houses and 13 cars.
Why does it matter? It matters because I don't want a president so far removed from the lives of ordinary people that he thinks our economy is basically sound. I don't want a president with seven houses who has voted seven times against raising the minimum wage.
I don't want a president who thinks it's OK to subsidize big oil companies or send American jobs overseas or allow corporations to shelter billions of tax dollars in Bermuda.
I don't want a president who owns 13 cars but refuses to support a G.I. bill for the heroes who have risked their lives in the war he voted for.
Judith Toler
Santa Fe
In his Sept. 30 column, "'Flex muscles?' C'mon Obama, lend an ear," Orlando Romero says he couldn't "stand four more years of Republicans and this Congress."
Memo to Mr. Romero: Democrats are the majority party in "this Congress" (both houses).
Jim Bruce
Santa Fe
If you're an Obama supporter and anti-war Santa Fean who wants us to get out of Iraq, is it clear to you that Obama will commit more troops to Afghanistan? Will this then be "the right war," and will you condone his actions? Why will you accept this expansion of the endless Middle East war? What makes you think that Obama, who until recently was also anti-war, and who has absolutely no military experience whatsoever, knows what he is doing in this regard?
Will you join him, enlist in the military, put your life where your vote is and go fight in Afghanistan and perhaps Pakistan? If not, then why will you vote for him, if you're really an anti-war Santa Fean? If you're a veteran, or more importantly on active duty, do you honestly believe Obama is fit to be commander-in-chief?
Mike Young
Santa Fe
Sixty American Nobel laureates have taken the unprecedented action of explicitly endorsing Obama for President. They recognize that we are faced with immense scientific challenges, foremost of which is how to provide energy to sustain the growth of our economy without destroying our planet. We in New Mexico have the scientific infrastructure to contribute to solving these national and global problems.
The Nobel laureates endorse Obama's scientific plan, which includes a true national commitment to science education and a doubling of the federal investment in research and development. New Mexico needs these policies. When such a diverse and pre-eminent group of American scientists articulates profound concern for our future, and explicitly endorses Obama as the best candidate to keep us safe and prosperous in the coming century, it is time to take notice. Our country, and our planet, cannot afford to ignore these pressing scientific issues.
Daniel Holz
Santa Fe
Why are Democrats afraid to embrace the foundation of their most notable achievements? It was liberals who advocated for and established Social Security more than 70 years ago. It was liberals who advocated for and established Medicare and Medicaid to provide adequate health coverage for the elderly and needy, and equal-rights laws for all races and genders; for minimum wage.
It was liberals who advocated for and established financial regulations to protect the citizenry during and following The Great Depression. And it was the "Compassionate Conservatism" group that dismantled these regulations and brought us to our present financial meltdown.
Enough! Let us embrace progressive liberalism and denounce the regressive compassionate conservatism that has led us to our current disastrous situation. We owe it to ourselves and the generations to follow.
Dale. M. Knapp
Santa Fe
At 72, John McCain is too old to be president. I know. I'm 72, and I'm too old to be president. At this age your memory starts going. You need more naps. The future is shorter than it used to be. John McCain and I were born during Franklin Delano Roosevelt's second administration. We are quaint old relics of a bygone time. Our views are backward, not forward.
Sen. McCain should spend his remaining years working for the poor and reading to his grandchildren. He and I are both, well, elderly.
Nancy Wood
Santa Fe
We are in a critical moment of "choice" for America's destiny as a country. As individuals, in the intensity of a crisis point, we may feel that the next step we take will lead toward either life or death. Our country is going through the same thing. We need to surrender all of our past beliefs, prejudices and the habitual thinking that has brought us to this crisis — all that has produced the illness, the pain, and the lack of hope.
Individuals in crisis need to surrender themselves, allowing Nature to exert itself. We need to let in what is right, just and good, allowing wisdom to work through our bodies and spirits. I pray that the people of our country will surrender to God and His will and let Him cast our votes for the one who will bring us less violence, peace and a more loving country.
Grant Taylor
Santa Fe
Voters weigh candidates' responses, backgrounds
It was interesting
to watch Sarah Palin patronizingly scold Joe Biden for "looking back
and pointing fingers" during the vice-presidential debate on Thursday.
She doesn't want us to examine her candidate's record.
John McCain "the maverick" was "broken" by George W. Bush in 2000,
saddled and reined, then put into service as a workhorse for the Bush
agenda, voting with Bush more than 90 percent of the time. Now he wants
us to believe he's a born-again maverick.
So of course Sarah Palin wants to scold us for looking back to see
that a fair share of the blame for the disastrous eight years under
Bush goes to John McCain. As the saying goes, those who cannot learn
from history are doomed to repeat it.
Palin's best interests are served by not looking back; our country's best interests are served by ignoring her.
Michael Freed
Santa Fe
And the Emmy for Best Actress in a Dramatic Role goes to Sarah
Palin. Yes, she showed us that she can deliver a script with conviction
and certainty every bit as well as Tina Fey. Her emotional range is
limited, but the part did not require that. What a sorry state of
affairs that we live in a country where performance in a 90-minute,
prime-time television show can potentially affect the course of the
next four years for our great country.
Four days in debate camp over 36 years in Congress; a hockey mom
who recites talking points on issues she has never even considered
prior to this campaign, versus someone who believes in and has lived
the votes he has cast and the positions and legislation he has fought
for. God help this nation and all who strive to make this a better
place for our children.
Andrew Neighbour
Santa Fe
I'm Cherokee, and I've just found out about Sarah Palin's record on
Alaska Native and tribal issues. We know the importance of Native
people being allowed to fish and hunt on their own lands.
Mrs. Palin is seeking to overturn every treaty the federal
government has made with Alaska. She is interested in turning Alaska
into a sport- and commercial-fishing paradise. Why am I not surprised?
Palin has also attacked Alaska tribal sovereignty and the preservation of Native languages.
As a Methodist pastor's wife, when I hear her proclaim, as she
stands with an AK-47 on one arm, how happy she is that she's a
Christian and "saved," I pray that we will all be saved from her.
Dolores Pettit Broyles
Santa Fe
Regarding the Sept. 29 letter, "Palin comparison": Lawrence
Franklin's comparison of Gov. Sarah Palin's lack of experience to that
of Theodore Roosevelt's is so factually incorrect he would have gotten
a failing grade in high-school American history.
Before entering the White House, Roosevelt had served as an elected
state legislator, police commissioner of the nation's largest city, as
assistant secretary of the Navy and governor of the nation's most
populated state. Palin, on the other hand, has been mayor of a small
town and run a state government whose budget is smaller than that of
some public-school systems.
Franklin's tactic of re-writing history to bolster the Palin
campaign is typical of the McCain campaign strategy: Repeat a lie often
enough and the public will believe it. To paraphrase a line from a
famous vice-presidential debate several years ago, "Governor, you're no
Teddy Roosevelt."
James McGrath Morris
Tesuque
There are quite a few omissions in Lawrence Franklin's comparison
of Gov. Palin to President Theodore Roosevelt. Before being selected as
McKinley's running mate in the 1900 election, Roosevelt at the age of
42 had accomplished the following: extensive travel abroad to include
engagement in war; Phi Beta Kappa and magna cum laude honors from
Harvard; a year at Columbia Law School; historian (published a dozen
books between 1882-1900); assemblyman of New York; National Guard;
appointment to the U.S. Civil Service Commission; president of the
board of the New York Police Commissioners; Assistant Secretary of the
Navy; lieutenant colonel and then colonel of the Rough Riders; and
governor of New York.
When being sworn in as president in 1901, Roosevelt, who is
considered to be in the top 10 of U.S. presidents and whose face graces
Mount Rushmore, was not sworn in on the Bible.
Suzanne J. Garney
Santa Fe
I'm a registered Republican. Back near Valentine's Day, John McCain
probably got tired of interviewing the long line of solicitous men and
barked, "I've got to have a woman." Enter Sarah Palin, the alluring gov
of ilasker. Charmed, he got all excited with dreams of hugs and
hand-holding on the campaign trail followed by encounters in the Oval
Office for a few years.
Do we need some PaliCain to deaden our senses right now? Everyone
should vote to make sure that this old man and his
unqualified-to-be-president, hot tamale running mate get to the White
House — through the visitors gate. McCain made a mockery of the
presidency when he chose Palin!
Joel M. Williams
Los Alamos
Presidential positions
Any serious person has to be very concerned about Barack Obama's
political philosophy. No matter how he presents himself, he believes in
much more government intervention and control in every aspect of our
lives and economy. "Change" to Obama is a radical realignment of power,
and freedom, to government and away from businesses and individuals.
He promises a tax cut for the "middle class," but he never mentions
that we middle-class folks already got that with the Bush tax cut. What
will accompany that gift from Barack? All sorts of direct taxes on
business (windfall taxes on oil companies, increases in corporate
taxes, increase in taxes on sole proprietorships — individuals owning
businesses — increases in taxes on investment gains, etc.) plus
indirect taxes (costly regulations) that will inevitably have a huge
impact on business growth and of course, jobs! More jobs for more
people is what we need! McCain will make that happen.
Jeff Forsman
Santa Fe
I have a message for Sen. John McCain and his neo-con supporters
who are constantly beating the war drum, telling us that we are
"fighting for our freedom" in Iraq. I would urge them to "Get thee to
the history books" and research World War II. At the start of World War
II, Germany and Japan had the most formidable army, navy and air force
the world had ever known. Their attack on the United States and its
allies became a true fight for our freedom. If we had not prevailed in
World War II, we might have lost our freedom.
To say that today the Taliban and other terrorist groups have the
capability to take our freedom away is preposterous. Where are the
millions of well-armed and equipped infantry, navy assault and landing
ships, an air force that rules the sky and a supply line second to none
that would be required to invade and conquer the U.S.? Let's call it
what it is: a fight to prevent terrorist attacks on U.S. soil and our
embassies around the world, not a fight for our freedom.
Richard Ohrbom
Santa Fe
We are in a critical moment of "choice" for America's destiny as a
country. As individuals, in the intensity of a crisis point, we may
feel that the next step we will lead toward either life or death. Our
country is going through the same thing. We need to surrender all of
our past beliefs, prejudices and the habitual thinking that has brought
us to this crisis — all that has produced the illness, the pain and the
lack of hope.
Individuals in crisis need to surrender themselves, allowing Nature
to exert itself. We need to let in what is right, just and good,
allowing wisdom to work through our bodies and spirits. I pray that the
people of our country will surrender to God and His will and let Him
cast our votes for the one who will bring us less violence, peace and a
more loving country.
Grant Taylor
Santa Fe
We are fortunate to have two intelligent men running for president
of this country. One is a talker and ambitious, the other a doer and
tested by adversity. Which one of these men would be better at guiding
our country through these challenging times?
Those who saw John McCain interviewed by George Stephanopoulos last
Sunday morning got a more comprehensive picture of the man than is
provided by so-called debates. We'd be better off with more interviews
by knowledgeable and experience experts. Such interviews would give the
citizens the background to make reasonable and sensible choices.
N.D. Shelton
Santa Fe
In answer to the many letters about Barack Obama's qualifications
for the presidency, I would like to state a few facts about his
background:
1. Obama's association with former Weather Underground terrorist William Ayers, in whose home Obama began his political career.
2. Obama's connections with Islam and radical politics, from his
father and stepfather's Islamic background to his communist and
socialist mentors in Hawaii and Chicago.
3. Obama's minister, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, who preaches hate
theology toward the United States. To be an informed voter, read Obama
Nation and then vote.
Gloria Wellman
Santa Fe
From the beginning, I sensed an honesty and exceptional
intelligence. As the months went by, I watched a community organizer
set up a campaign network that got the message out and recruited
thousands of new voters, young and old.
Through it all, I've heard about change — not the easy change of
unvetted Annie Oakleys or no more earmarks, but detailed plans for
improving education, for green technology, for diplomatic roads that
move past 9/11. And as the race continues, I have admired a calm,
reasoned leader who listens.
The first step to solving our current problems is to elect Barack Obama president. Obama opens the door; we push. Yes, we can!
Margaret S. Upshaw
Santa Fe
I'm leaning toward Barack Obama, but have to admit I might not
vote. I am upset that Hillary Clinton, as a female, was ignored by our
delegates and governor.
I will withhold support until I hear something on the issues,
intentions or appointments (to the cabinet positions, military,
financial sector, federal judge, etc.) being considered by the
candidates. These are the individuals who really run our country.
Exactly what are we to expect if Barack Obama or John McCain becomes
president? Our political experts should be looking into these things
and providing that kind of information to convince us to vote.
Jacobo Jackie Suazo
Santa Fe
Other races crowd political field
I almost wish I hadn't heard the live debate on KUNM between Carol
Miller, Dan East and Ben Ray Luján. It would make casting my vote in
this congressional race much easier. However, once I had the
opportunity to compare the experience, expertise, and positions of the
three candidates, I was left with no choice but to vote for Miller, an
independent.
When health-care reform is one of the top national issues, it makes
sense to vote for a candidate with a master's degree in public health
who has served Clinton and Reagan as a policy adviser on health-care
issues, and has 13 years experience as an EMT. Carol Miller is the
best-informed candidate, has good answers for New Mexico and is
amazingly well rounded in her life experience.
Elisabeth Keller
Santa Fe
Northern New Mexico (Santa Fe and vicinity) has developed a
peculiar political system marked by one-party domination and a form of
patrimony, viewing public office as a kind of property inherited from
one's father or ancestor.
Hence, Ben R. Luján, the Democratic candidate for the U.S. House of
Representative in the 3rd Congressional District, is the son of the
speaker of the New Mexico House of Representatives. Luján is opposed by
Republican Dan East and independent candidate Carol Miller.
Jerome Block Jr. is the Democratic candidate for the Public
Regulation Commission in District 3, which includes Santa Fe. His
father is a former member of the PRC and its predecessor body.
Lacking a Republican nominee, Block's only opponent is Rick Lass, the Green Party candidate.
If we should support the apparently best-qualified, our votes would go to John McCain, Dan East and Rick Lass.
Hal Blostein
Cochiti Lake
The Rick Lass Campaign for Public Regulation Commission has brought together people of all political persuasions.
We recognize the importance of electing a well-qualified person to this important position.
The PRC is a five-member commission with responsibility for
regulating corporations in our state. It reviews applications for
utility rate increases.
Rick Lass will represent the citizens of New Mexico in his consideration of the issues facing the commission.
Rick Lass is a graduate of St. John's College and has lived in the state since 1984.
He has worked in the state Legislature to make improvements in our
electoral system. He is founder of the organization Voting Matters. A
vote for Rick Lass will be a vote for the most-qualified candidate for
the Public Regulation Commission.
If you cast a straight-party vote, be sure to fill in the oval
opposite Rick Lass for Public Regulation Commission on the ballot. Make
your vote count for Rick.
Marion Seymour
Santa Fe