Login or register
Bills target Richardson 'political hires'
Kate Nash | The New Mexican
Posted: Monday, October 19, 2009
- 10/20/09
18
Story Tools
Font Size:
Bills target Richardson 'political hires' Facebook
Get FREE Daily Headlines by email!

Related Items
advertisement
The number of exempt employees in state government — quickly becoming a magnet for criticism by lawmakers looking to balance the state budget — would shrink under two measures introduced Monday.

The proposals, introduced by a Republican and a Democrat, would limit the number of the employees who serve at the pleasure of the governor — a number that has grown under Gov. Bill Richardson.

"Governor Richardson's political appointments, who are often considered political paybacks, are costing the state over $40 million a year," Sen. John Ryan, R-Albuquerque, said.

"There are a lot better uses for this money, especially as the state faces a financial crisis," Ryan said in a statement. "In order to pay for the governor's friends on the state's payroll, programs and services have lost out on that funding."

Ryan's bill would limit the number of exempts appointed by the governor to 220, eliminating 281 exempt positions in January 2010.

"I think we need to have some kind of limitation in state statute that kind of sets a parameter," he said during a debate on the Senate floor Monday. "I think that's a better way to do it than have an unlimited ability to create these positions."

Another bill, sponsored by Rep. Nate Cote, D-Las Cruces, would reduce the number of exempts by at least 180 positions, which Cote said would save more than $8.1 million this fiscal year and about twice that next year, according to the bill. It sets a Jan. 22 deadline for making the cuts.

"I believe there may be millions available we haven't looked at yet, and we need to do so. It has been recommended that we cut public education and Medicaid, yet we haven't looked at the high-salaried, exempt employees," Cote said.

While the state is talking about cuts to education and health care, Cote said cutting the number of exempt employees could be a big money saver as well. His bill applies to exempt employees making more than $50,000 a year.

"This is one door that has not been opened," he said.

As the discussion plays out, it's clear that the estimates on the numbers of exempt employees and how much they cost the state vary greatly.

Ryan said during the debate Monday the number of exempt workers is 500 — with an average salary of $80,000. He said that's up from 167 exempt employees under former Gov. Gary Johnson.

Department of Finance and Administration Secretary Katherine Miller, who faced lengthy questioning on the Senate floor about the exempt employees, said it's more like 450.

"A lot of wrong statistics are out there about exempts," she said.

Miller defended the number of exempts and pointed out the governor isn't the only one who hires them.

"I think when you look at the size of state government ... proportionally, that is not an unusually high number," she said.

The Attorney General's Office and the Legislature also have exempt employees, she said.

"There aren't any classified employees in those offices," she said, "but nobody makes a big issue of that."

Whatever the number, the practice has drawn ire from lawmakers.

Senate President Pro Tem Tim Jennings, D-Roswell, said the increase in the number of exempts hired by the governor shows wrong priorities on the part of the executive.

"Why is it that all the people who are exempt qualify for recurring (expenditures) and yet (to) the children who can least take care of themselves, we sit there and say, 'no you're not recurring,' " he said during the floor debate, referring to the hundreds of developmentally disabled children on a waiting list for services.

Meanwhile, lawmakers set to reduce state spending by $660 million in the session that started Saturday are also working to reduce the amount spent on the Legislative branch.

Under one measure (HB 16), the expenditures of the legislative branch in 2010 would be reduced by 5.3 percent. It was unclear what that amount translates to in dollars or what the specific cuts would be.

Another measure (SCR 1) calls for lawmakers to voluntarily reduce their per diem payment of $159 a day by at least 10 percent.

If all 112 lawmakers did that, the state would save $1,780 a day for each day the lawmakers are paid. The elected "citizen legislators" don't get a salary but receive per diem payments while they are in session and on days they do other legislative work, such as interim committee meetings.

Already, the House has cut 13 staff positions to save money.

Contact Kate Nash at 986-3036 or knash@sfnewmexican.com. Read her blog at www.greenchilechatter.com.


You must login to make comments.
Click on the link below to register for a free account. This is a new system and previous accounts are not transferred to this system. You'll be asked for your name and e-mail address. A confirmation e-mail with a password will be sent to you at the address you provide. Once you've logged into the system, you'll be able to view and contribute comments. Please be respectful to your fellow users and post under your own name. Send questions to webeditor@sfnewmexican.com

Email:
Password:
Remember me
Register here for a free username and password

Comments (12)
What do you think? Add your two cents to the conversation by contributing your view on the news. Please, be respectful to the community and your fellow users and use your real name when posting. Inappropriate postings will be removed and your privileges to comment further might be suspended. If you'd prefer to submit a letter to the editor for possible inclusion in The New Mexican's print edition, visit our submissions page.


(not you? logout)

Yikes   (posted on 10/26/2009)
Slime is difficult to clean up.
Orlando Baca   (posted on 10/22/2009)
If you wern't depressed already, here is a look at the future: As soon as Richardson leaves--Diane Denish takes over. Everything that has happened during the Richardson-Denish era will continue and expand under Denish. Grat future we have!!
i believe   (posted on 10/21/2009)
there are even more perks for these gov -ex employees that was was stated below. they have a gas card they have lunches free, they are reimbursed for travel when they stay at a friends house and never ever stayed in a motel/hotel. they take their wife or girlfriend (if male) or husband or boyfriend to confrences and we pay for them too. it at the very least 200k per month. so i'll be the bigger person and say there is 450 gov-ex at an average of 200k that 90million dollars. 90million dollars. 90 million dollars. What the heck is going on.
still have hope   (posted on 10/21/2009)
"Ryan said during the debate Monday the number of exempt workers is 500 — with an average salary of $80,000. He said that's up from 167 exempt employees under former Gov. Gary Johnson" Oh brother - that's 80K per year nonsense is just that. it may be an average of 80k per year for their salary alone. This does not include their health, dental, life insurance and PERA benefits. AND it doesn't include the state government car they use every day, the credit card given to them for "expenses", the days they don't go to work and they don't use their sick or annual leave. Let me tell you, 80K is far from their annual salary. with everything it's more like an average of 200K per year. Let's get real shall we?
Fred S.   (posted on 10/21/2009)
Let's hope that they actually do it. Either bill will do.
I would like   (posted on 10/21/2009)
...to know what exactly the so-caled "DWI Czar", does in her "40 hour week". Cheeseburger Bill needs to go.
Raul   (posted on 10/20/2009)
State workers and NM's who pay attention know that this is patronage, plain and simple. We've been here before. Even if DFA is right and it's 450 it's a couple hundred too many. Appointees are a fact of political life but this is the difference between a pig and a hog. People got taxpayer funded jobs cuz they gave $ and threw parties for Bill. And it's clear they're accountable to King Bill and NOT the NM taxpayer. It's your $ NM. It ain't the carpetbaggers dinero.
Maria   (posted on 10/20/2009)
When the Gov came in, so did the so called "Ombudsman". As defined, "somebody, especially a man, responsible for investigating and resolving complaints from consumers or other members of the public against a company, institution, or other organization." Then why do we have UNIONs and lawyers?
native1   (posted on 10/20/2009)
I really hope this bill is passed and I hope more than one person at the round house realizes the impact a lot of these exempt salaries have had on our state budget. As far as the "hiring freeze", of course there was no "freeze" for hiring exempts!
ingram1ja   (posted on 10/20/2009)
Conservative Democrats on House Rules Committee Kill Revenue Generator Bills and Hopes to Stop More Student Value Cuts & Education Spending Cuts The House Rules Committee, did just like the Senate Committee of Committees did over the weekend. The House Rules Committee voted Monday against considering revenue generators as a way to close the budget gap. These senior conservative Democrats may be targeted for defeat in Democratic primaries and the November 2010 general election. House and Senate committees, which are controlled by conservative Democrats, decided the revenue generator bills aren't authorized under special session guidelines handed down by Gov. Richardson. Younger, progressive Democrats (so far overruled by conservatives who have been in office 30 years or more) are advocating for rolling back tax cuts passed by these conservative Democrats for the wealthiest New Mexicans ($295K or more), and closing tax loopholes for out-of-state corporations, as ways to raise revenue and avoid cuts to education. A majority of registered voters strongly supports rolling back the tax cuts for richest, wanting to avert any reductions in school spending. A recent poll by Brian Sanderoff’s Research & Polling, Inc. demonstrates that the public overwhelmingly supports these revenue generators, too. Conservative Democrats, who control the Senate and House – Sens. Jennings, M. Sanchez, J.A. Smith, Reps. B. Lujan, K. Saavedra, K. Martinez agreed with Richardson ahead of the session that rolling back tax cuts for the richest and closing tax loopholes for out-of-state corporations wouldn't be considered. As a result, these same senior, conservative Democratic legislative leaders say student value cuts cannot be avoided. These same senior, conservative Democratic legislative leaders are proposing to cut the student value again by $150 million. If this cut passes the special session, there will be layoffs of teachers, faculty, education assistants, secretaries/clerks, maintenance, custodians, food service workers, bus drivers. Some of these same senior conservative Democratic legislative leaders have actually proposed that teachers can start driving school buses! Who elected these politicians? Who are they who protect the richest and out-of-state corporations? Who are they who cut the value of school children? Where are the moral values of these senior conservative Democratic legislative leaders? Simple: Gone missing. Simple: The wealthiest New Mexicans and out-of-state corporations bank-roll their election campaigns. They must be stopped in November 2010. Richardson, after weeks of spinning that he opposed any education cuts, is now proposing to cut student values by $52 million, in addition to cutting colleges and university budgets, and public services budgets by another $565 million. Gov. RICHardson says he doesn’t want classroom teaching to be affected but that’s just more spin. Senate Majority Leader Michael Sanchez, a senior conservative Democrat from Belen, said the session could be wrapped up by Wednesday. House Majority Leader Ken Martinez, a senior conservative Democrat from Grants, called the special session the most difficult one he's ever been in. He said more revenue generating bills will be killed in committees, which will guarantee more student value cuts. "We're just going to handle what we can handle in a short session," Martinez said. "We want to get out of here as soon as we can." Indeed, let's get them all out in November 2010.
Katy Trujillo   (posted on 10/20/2009)
I applaud you on a well overdue conversation although I think the gov will veto it. We can no longer afford the govs paybacks to campaign supporters, the wealthy tax breaks, movie loans, spaceport and exempts need to be looked at as well as big business tax. It is time to swallow that pride and do something that is right for NM before he leaves!
CB Kay   (posted on 10/20/2009)
YESSSSS, Finally!!!! Don't just talk about it, follow thru and do it! And if you do it and are successful, run for governor, (even though you are a R), and clean up all the inter-related trash in politics.


advertisement
  • JB Yelsky commented on
  • Ambro A commented on
  • P Orlando Baca commented on
  • Truett Collins commented on
  • Ambro A commented on
  • Joe McNabb commented on
  • Ambro A commented on
  • Doreen Saiz-Adler commented on