MarketSpace Classifieds:
Jobs
Cars
Real Estate
Merchandise
Your browser does not support iframes.
Home
News
Sports
Opinion
Pasatiempo
Community
Visitors
Calendar
Obituaries
Photos
Video
TV / Movies
Subscribers
Help
Santa Fe News Links:
Roundhouse Roundup
Green Chile Chatter
Police notes
News briefs
Business
Columns
La Voz
Santa Fe Sports Links:
Grammer School blog
The Read Barron blog
Prep
NFL
MLB
NASCAR
NBA
Golf
Popular Links:
Santa Fe News
Santa Fe Sports
Police Notes
Columns
Neighbors
Teen
eTaste
Scoop
Green Line
La Voz
Archives
UC hopes to continue talks on $3 million fine
More than 1,000 pages of documents found in home of lab worker in October 2006
Wendy Brown |
The New Mexican
Posted: Tuesday, November 06, 2007
-
Comments
Story Tools
Font Size:
Facebook
Twitter
Print story
Get FREE Daily Headlines by email!
advertisement
The University of California has contested a $3 million fine issued in July over the discovery of Los Alamos National Laboratory classified documents at the home of a subcontractor's employee.
The U.S. Department of Energy notified the university of the unprecedented fine after more than 1,000 pages of documents were found at the worker's home in October 2006.
University spokesman Chris Harrington said the school has filed a notice of its intent to seek judicial review of the fine, but only because it wants to protect its legal rights as a 30-day deadline looms.
"It is important to note that the university has not decided to appeal the decision," said Harrington in a statement. The university managed the laboratory from 1943 until May 31, 2006, when a consortium including the university took over management.
The university and the Energy Department have been discussing the university's notice of violation, Harrington said, and the university's action allows those discussions to continue.
The university has been in settlement discussions with the National Nuclear Safety Administration for several weeks, according to a letter from a lawyer working for the university to an Energy Department official. NNSA is an agency within the Energy Department.
Harrington said he couldn't comment on the settlement discussions.
The fine and notice of violation resulted from the case of former contract worker Jessica Quintana, who had a high-level security clearance but downloaded and printed classified information from the lab in July 2006, according to her federal plea agreement.
Police found the information in Quintana's home in October when they were investigating an unrelated case, according to the agreement. She pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified information.
The University of California committed five security-related violations in the case, according to a letter from NNSA. And Los Alamos National Security LLC committed seven security-related violations, according to the letter. The lab's violations ranged from failing to protect data ports to failing to assure physical security, according to the letter.
NNSA spokesman John Broehm said the administration does not comment on pending legal issues.
The fine, however, is the largest the administration has ever issued, Broehm said.
"It's unprecedented," he said.
The Energy Department also fined Los Alamos National Security $300,000 in the case.
Kevin Roark, a lab spokesman, said the lab has already paid the fine.
Contact Wendy Brown at 986-3072 or wbrown@sfnewmexican.com.
You must register with a valid email address and use your real name to comment on this forum. Previous usernames are no longer valid as of Feb. 5. Once you've logged into the system, you'll be able to contribute comments. If you need help logging in or establishing your new user name and password, please
visit this tutorial
.
All users are expected to abide by the
forum rules
and and be courteous to other users. Comments can be accepted up to eight days following publication. After that, comments can be read but no new submissions made. Send questions to
webeditor@sfnewmexican.com
IMPORTANT: After registering, please check your e-mail for a message to confirm your e-mail address. Comments will not post immediately until you've confirmed your e-mail address by clicking the link in the e-mail. Postings under false names will be removed per
forum rules.
View the discussion thread.
blog comments powered by
Disqus
Feb. 3 Live blog archive
Alleged display of nude pics draws fire
Live blog archive: Feb. 8, 2010
As another movie shoots around Santa Fe,
debate continues on incentives
Live blog archive:Feb. 4, 2010
Police: Injured toddler may lose his legs
Spirit of Santa Fe: City has always been a crossroads for adventurers
Legislature 2010: New garage has plenty of vacancies as state workers campaign to nix fees
N.M. Supreme Court halts White Peak land swap
Domestic partnerships bill passes first hurdle, but could meet its fate in Finance Committee
Coming Soon!
advertisement
View latest comments >>
Powered by Disqus
advertisement