MarketSpace Classifieds:
Jobs
Cars
Real Estate
Merchandise
Your browser does not support iframes.
Home
News
Sports
Opinion
Pasatiempo
Community
Visitors
Calendar
Obituaries
Photos
Video
TV / Movies
Subscribers
Help
Santa Fe News Links:
Roundhouse Roundup
Green Chile Chatter
Police notes
News briefs
Business
Columns
La Voz
Santa Fe Sports Links:
Grammer School blog
The Read Barron blog
Prep
NFL
MLB
NASCAR
NBA
Golf
Popular Links:
Santa Fe News
Santa Fe Sports
Police Notes
Columns
Neighbors
Teen
eTaste
Scoop
Green Line
La Voz
Archives
Mining challenge heads to court
Opponents to uranium operations say radiation levels would be too high for residents
Ben Neary |
The Associated Press
Posted: Monday, May 12, 2008
-
Comments
Story Tools
Font Size:
Facebook
Twitter
Print story
Get FREE Daily Headlines by email!
advertisement
DENVER — Federal judges expressed surprise Monday that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued permits to allow a company to leach uranium out of an aquifer that supplies drinking water to thousands of Navajos in New Mexico.
Local groups are challenging the NRC's approval of permits for Hydro Resources Inc., a New Mexico company, to operate in-situ mines near the Navajo communities of Crownpoint and Church Rock in Western New Mexico.
A three-judge panel of the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments Monday in what lawyers say is the first-ever challenge to the NRC's approval of licenses for an in-situ uranium mining operation.
Opponents said the proposed mining would push radiation levels in the area past federal standards for human exposure, while lawyers for the mine developer and the NRC said the mine would be safe for area residents and wouldn't affect drinking water.
The in-situ process uses chemicals to free uranium from the surrounding ore, allowing it to be pumped out of the ground with water and refined on the surface.
Dozens of companies have proposed similar mines around the West as uranium prices climb. Companies have recently submitted dozens of letters of intent to the NRC outlining plans for new in-situ mines in Wyoming, Utah, Colorado, New Mexico and other states.
Monday's court hearing drew representatives from citizen groups fighting similar mine proposals in Colorado and South Dakota.
The Crownpoint-Church Rock area remains scarred from uranium-mining booms of decades past. Old underground mining operations have left piles of tailings, or processed mine waste, on the ground in many places. Critics blame the mining activity for sickening miners, many of them Navajo.
The Navajo Nation, which includes lands in Western New Mexico and eastern Arizona, outlawed uranium mining in 2005.
Navajo schoolchildren from Crownpoint traveled to Denver on Monday and held placards in front of the federal courthouse with messages such as "Say no to uranium, say no to sickness."
Savanna Cowboy, 15, a student at Crownpoint Middle School, said the school is about a half-mile from Hydro Resources' proposed processing plant.
"I know for a fact what uranium can cause," Cowboy said outside of the courthouse Monday. "It causes health problems, health effects and contaminates the water really bad."
Eric D. Jantz, a lawyer for the citizens' group Eastern Navajo Diné Against Uranium Mining and for the Southwest Research and Information Center, told the judges that radioactive waste from past mining activities continues to contaminate people at Church Rock.
Jantz said experts have calculated the proposed in-situ mining operations would generate enough radiation that, when combined with existing radiation from past mining, would exceed federal human exposure limits.
"The question for you today, your honors, is whether the NRC can disregard radiation from that source and continue to do its statutory duty to protect the public?" Jantz told the judges.
Jantz said the company proposes to leach uranium "in the same aquifer where the town of Crownpoint gets its water."
In response, Judge David M. Ebel said, "I can't even begin to understand that."
You must register with a valid email address and use your real name to comment on this forum. Previous usernames are no longer valid as of Feb. 5. Once you've logged into the system, you'll be able to contribute comments. If you need help logging in or establishing your new user name and password, please
visit this tutorial
.
All users are expected to abide by the
forum rules
and and be courteous to other users. Comments can be accepted up to eight days following publication. After that, comments can be read but no new submissions made. Send questions to
webeditor@sfnewmexican.com
IMPORTANT: After registering, please check your e-mail for a message to confirm your e-mail address. Comments will not post immediately until you've confirmed your e-mail address by clicking the link in the e-mail. Postings under false names will be removed per
forum rules.
View the discussion thread.
blog comments powered by
Disqus
Feb. 3 Live blog archive
Alleged display of nude pics draws fire
Live blog archive: Feb. 8, 2010
Police: Injured toddler may lose his legs
As another movie shoots around Santa Fe,
debate continues on incentives
Drivers' snow fatigue is boarders' bliss
Live blog archive:Feb. 4, 2010
'Freeze' doesn't stop state from hiring
Senate takes rare vote to override gov.'s veto
Spirit of Santa Fe: City has always been a crossroads for adventurers
Coming Soon!
advertisement
View latest comments >>
Powered by Disqus
advertisement