Login or register
Film fest, still paying past debts, downsizes
Festival reduces number of titles it will screen; works to pay filmmakers rental fees

Robert Nott |
Posted: Tuesday, October 27, 2009
- 10/28/09
10
Story Tools
Font Size:
Film fest, still paying past debts, downsizes Facebook
Get FREE Daily Headlines by email!

advertisement
The Santa Fe Film Festival plans to launch its 10th anniversary fest this December, despite financial setbacks and a failure to pay some previous festival filmmakers for screening their works.

California-based filmmaker Shane MacDougall said The Santa Fe Film Festival failed to pay him a rental fee for screenings of his film about dachshund racing, Wiener Takes All. MacDougall said he's been trying to get festival director Jon Bowman to pay him roughly $1,500 since early this year.

Wiener Takes All, a favorite at last year's festival, also was shown through February at the now-defunct Film Center, what had been the festival's year-round screening venue until it closed in April. MacDougall and Bowman agreed they to share a 60/40 box-office split — in favor of the festival.

"I don't want to come across as an angry, bitter filmmaker, but a deal is a deal," MacDougall said by phone Monday. "It wasn't like monies weren't collected. That was a door split, they collected our money and took our portion — and they're going to have another film festival and they haven't paid off their own debt? That's unethical. That's never happened to us elsewhere. We've had guys who have been slow to pay us, but I haven't been stiffed on a door split."

Speaking by phone Tuesday, Bowman acknowledged the festival has experienced a few economic bumps this year, and it still owes MacDougall and some other filmmakers rental fees for screenings at The Film Center.

"We just sent them a check for $400," Bowman said of MacDougall and his co-producer and wife, M.E. Law. "When we closed The Film Center there were a number of filmmakers we had to pay, but first we had to take care of employees and utilities, and get situated for this year's festival. We're now starting to pay everyone else. We paid about $3,000 to different filmmakers in the last two weeks. That's not the full amount we owe, but we have started to make a big dent."

The film festival kicks off again with five days of screenings, panel talks, parties and movie-related events in December.

Bowman said he plans to step down after this year's festival. He will be replaced by Karen RedHawk Dallet, the festival's operations director, in January.

Bowman said the economic downturn and a drop in national sponsors led the nonprofit festival to cut this year's budget by about $100,000. The fest will reduce the number of titles it screens to 150 from last year's 250.

The festival's 2007 income-tax return shows total expenses adding up to about $406,000, with a net profit of about $700. Bowman declined to say how much debt the festival is carrying now, but said he is working to reduce the number of payables.

"Anyone we owe money to, we pay," he said. "In the beginning, there were times it took us two or three years to pay people, but now it's more like a half-year to a year."

Tom Hasse, spokesman for the festival, confirmed in a news release Tuesday that this year's event will be presented "despite financial setbacks." The release acknowledged the fest is carrying debt from the closing of the Film Center and stated, "Everyone will get paid as soon as possible."

Film festival board president Walter Gallegos said filmmakers like MacDougall are the backbone of the event and that the fest can't afford to earn a bad reputation by not paying them.

"This was brought to my attention recently," Gallegos said Tuesday. "That doesn't mean I didn't realize we owe money to people — I do. If I had known about this, I would have regretted not calling him and touching personal base with him."

MacDougall said that $1,500 means a lot to independent filmmakers like himself in terms of marketing costs, plane fare to film festivals to promote the movie and related expenses. He said he'll believe the $400 check when he sees it. He and Law have exchanged several e-mails (some of which they copied to The New Mexican on Tuesday) and phone calls with Bowman regarding such assurances in the past.

"Promises were made, excuses were made, and I was really calm and patient and nothing materialized," Law said, adding that Bowman did offer to send an initial payment of $100 in September. She asked for $400, and was contemplating giving the festival more time until she discovered it was planning its 10th year.

"Obviously they have the money; they are staging another festival," she said. "I don't want this to happen to other filmmakers."

Contact Robert Nott at 986-3021 or rnott@sfnewmexican.com

On the Web


You must login to make comments.
Click on the link below to register for a free account. This is a new system and previous accounts are not transferred to this system. You'll be asked for your name and e-mail address. A confirmation e-mail with a password will be sent to you at the address you provide. Once you've logged into the system, you'll be able to view and contribute comments. Please be respectful to your fellow users and post under your own name. Send questions to webeditor@sfnewmexican.com

Email:
Password:
Remember me
Register here for a free username and password

Comments (9)
What do you think? Add your two cents to the conversation by contributing your view on the news. Please, be respectful to the community and your fellow users and use your real name when posting. Inappropriate postings will be removed and your privileges to comment further might be suspended. If you'd prefer to submit a letter to the editor for possible inclusion in The New Mexican's print edition, visit our submissions page.


(not you? logout)

Waldo Ortega   (posted on 10/28/2009)
Hi Shane, Glad you showed up. Problem with the Internet is you can't hide. This what you posted under "List Your Details" on festivalfocus.com So with your denials you are burying yourself. I left off as needlessly provocative that you list your current project as "A**holes." I also note there is a guy who shares your contact details in Canada "Shane Macdougall Shane MacDougall's Autolane is Cape Breton's Source for great used cars p: 902-820-2494" http://www.hotfrog.ca/Products/used-car-dealers/9 http://www.festivalfocus.org/user_view.php?uid=3769 Shane MacDougall, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada General details [email Shane] NameShane MacDougall LocationHalifax, Nova Scotia, Canada Job TitlePresident Websitehttp://www.infantmonster.com http://wienertakesall.blogspot.com Facebook Profile IMDB Profile YouTube Profile Myspace Profile About meCanadian filmmaker Shane MacDougall started out in the two most cut throat areas of show biz – standup comedy and children’s television writing. From the hellish environs of biker bar comedy gigs in Northern Ontario, to the demonic world of “Franklin The Turtle”, to free-lance writing for VH1, MacDougall has endured the extremes of man’s inhumanity to man. This experience prepared him well for his most recent project, “Wiener Takes All”, a feature length documentary about the cutthroat world of competitive dachshunds. The film is about to complete a successful run on the film festival circuit (including sold out crowds in Seattle, San Francisco, Halifax and others), and was recently selected as the first finalist for the A&E IndieFilm Spotlight program. An ex-animation and sketch writer, MacDougall has had several adult, reality, and animation projects optioned by various companies. In the 90’s, MacDougall made a name for himself by running Canada’s longest running alternative comedy show, “The Dark Show”, one of the hottest tickets at Toronto’s famous “Rivoli” club. In 2000, he again made international headlines when he challenged Queen Elizabeth to a kickboxing match (or math test) for the monarchy of Canada. His short film, “Time Traveling Coach: Episode 13,” still appears occasionally as a bumper on Canadian television. The film is a sketch about a motivational coach brought in to console Incan athletes when they lose a game and don’t get sacrificed. Shane is currently shooting his next film, "A--HOLES: A Scientific Study of Jerks." But we the good residents of Santa Fe know you are just a sweet choir boy of a guy, not into kicking a great local non-profit trying to survive in hard times. Did you read the article? The festival showed 250 films and netted $700. Without that tremendous effort you and other film makers would have not have had a local venue for your film. Learn to work with people, instead of trying to throw them under the bus! Vaya con Dios, but please Vaya!
Gregorio Ambrosini   (posted on 10/28/2009)
test
Bill In Santa Flush   (posted on 10/28/2009)
Exactly why I am on my last job that is paid by any city or state agency!
shane macdougall   (posted on 10/28/2009)
Hi - I'm Shane MacDougall, one of the filmmakers referenced in the article. A friend pointed me to Waldo's comments. 1) I am not, nor have ever been involved in an "adult" project, if by adult you mean sexual content. I have no idea what the poster is rambling about (nor does he for that matter). 2) Yes, I was involved in an anti-monarchist / pro-republic movement in Canada (I'm Canadian), which in turn helped spawn a non-profit pro-republic organization. I know, a filmmaker with an interest in politics, how rare (?!). 3) The Santa Fe Film Festival did not "give me a break". The festival was one of the very last we attended - at great expense to us - airfare, hotel, gas mileage, etc. I also spent a nice bit of time promoting the screenings in Santa Fe - which resulted in three sold out shows for the fest, and then screened for them for 2.5 months to help the festival raise even more money. The festival made a nice chunk of change off our backs. Who gave whom what break? Waldo do you think films magically appear? Do you think the 75K we spent creating and promoting the film is money we invest solely to entertain others with no hope of compensation on the back end? They stole money from us - plain and simple. If that's your opinion of giving someone a break, you've got some serious ethical issues. Please don't say "exposure" was the "break" we were getting from SFFF; our press kit was already brimming at the seams before the fest. More importantly, you can't pay the bills with "exposure". Go down to the power company and try to tell them you can't pay your power bill, but that you have a great looking media kit. Good luck with that. Yes these are tough times - especially for independent filmmakers - without whom there would be no festivals. If you want to "circle the wagons" to protect those who exploit artists (who for the most part are de facto non profits too) knock yourself out. Somehow I think you'll be very comfortable with each other. We did not ask for this to happen - we had an agreement with the festival that they broke. We made repeated attempts to resolve this - including installment payments. They didn't even honor that. Ten months later we escalate the issue and we're media ho's? You have an odd perspective on the world sir. The wonderful thing about the Internet is that your insipid logic will be archived here for all to see for a long time to come, and there's nothing you can do to change that.
Waldo Ortega   (posted on 10/28/2009)
It would be nice if the New Mexican had vetted this story a little better. First about Shane McDougall, readers might take his complaints a little differently if they knew more about him. Did you know he made international headlines when he challenged Queen Elizabeth to a kickboxing match (or math test) for the monarchy of Canada? Or his Adult project background? Not saying the artist doesn't deserve his money, just saying because a Media Ho is crying, does not mean they are not twisting a knife into the festival that gave them a break. These are hard times people, we should close ranks and support our local non-profits!
Ambro A   (posted on 10/28/2009)
Well if it ain`t Ms. Pigott! Where the heck you been? Call me, You got my number.
chris valdez   (posted on 10/28/2009)
Would have been nice if Bowman, silverman and all the other MEN paid their artists/filmakers; otherwise remember what happened to Taos.... You can't have a nice quaint event and glad hand while ripping people off. What community support do you propose to pay the filmmakers from LAST YEAR?
Jim Terr   (posted on 10/28/2009)
Would have been nice to "introduce" this year's festival with something a bit more positive, of all the possible news angles. Anyhow, a great festival which will survive and continue and prosper and pay old bills, with a little community support. One of the most fun events of the year in Santa Fe, in my opinion.
carole pigott   (posted on 10/28/2009)
I am always amazed when festival promoters and gallery owners think that paying an artist is the last on their list. That THEIR existence is more important than those who actually create the art they sale. Does being a gallery owner or festival promoter require them to be a sociopath?


advertisement
  • JB Yelsky commented on
  • Ambro A commented on
  • P Orlando Baca commented on
  • Truett Collins commented on
  • Ambro A commented on
  • Joe McNabb commented on
  • Ambro A commented on
  • Doreen Saiz-Adler commented on