Login or register
Police brace for shortage in annexation's wake
As city officials plan to take over duties from county with added land, department seeks 48 new positions

Jason Auslander | The New Mexican
Posted: Tuesday, October 20, 2009
- 10/21/09
5
Story Tools
Font Size:
Police brace for shortage in annexation's wake Facebook
Get FREE Daily Headlines by email!

Related Items
advertisement
City police department officials are confident that the existing number of officers will be able to handle the expected increase in calls for service in areas to be annexed next month.

It's Phase 2 of the annexation process — slated for the end of 2011 — that has them concerned, Deputy Chief Abram Anaya said. The city will absorb more than 10 times the number of new residents and nearly twice the amount of acreage as it will in Phase 1.

To that end, the department is asking the City Council to approve 48 new positions — including 27 more patrol officers, five more supervisors, nine more traffic-related officers, four more animal-control officers and three support staff — to be able to keep up with the expected workload increase, according to a memo Anaya wrote for city councilors, Mayor David Coss and City Manager Galen Buller.

"If we miss this opportunity to prepare for the future, annexation will be upon (us) and we will not be prepared and service to the community will suffer," Anaya wrote.

Councilors are scheduled to hear from city police and fire officials about annexation issues during a 5 p.m. special meeting today in the Council Chambers at City Hall.

Phase 1 of the annexation plan, scheduled to go into effect Nov. 10, will fill in many small areas, mainly along Interstate 25 on the city's southern border. It will bring more than 1,900 acres into the city and at least 1,313 more people, based on 2000 census figures.

The Police Department's main concern with Phase 1 is the 7.5 miles of Interstate 25 between N.M. 599 and Old Pecos Trail over which the city will assume new responsibility, Anaya said. City police will become the primary responding agency when accidents occur along that section of interstate, which is now the responsibility of the Santa Fe County Sheriff's Office.

In 2008, 39 accidents occurred along that stretch of interstate — 24 with injuries and 15 without, according to Anaya's memo. "It's not overly significant," he said. Still, he noted that investigating interstate highway crashes is far more hazardous than accidents on city streets because of the speed of cars on the road. Thus, it requires more safety personnel, he said.

However, when Phase 2 of the annexation becomes a reality, the city will assume responsibility for 3,765 more acres and 13,650 more people, based on the 2000 census figures. Phase 3 will include about the same number of new residents as Phase 1, though it will incorporate more than 4,100 new acres into the city limits.

Anaya painstakingly researched the Sheriff's Office's 2008 calls for service in all the areas to be annexed and found that deputies responded to 28,521 incidents during that time, which took 35,373 hours, his memo states. Those are the numbers he used to calculate that the department will need 48 new positions. He said that was the "optimum" number of new personnel the city Police Department needs to avoid a drop-off in service in other areas.

In addition to the 27 new patrol officers, the department will need four more sergeants and one more lieutenant to supervise those officers, according to the memo. It will also need two new traffic officers, two more public-safety aides, three new DWI officers, two more K-9 officers, two records clerks, four animal-control officers and one clerk/typist to keep up with added workload, the memo says. Anaya did not know how much all 48 positions would cost, but said his office is working on the numbers.

Two years ago, city police asked for 45 new officers over three years to improve the service to existing residents. Anaya said that request "was not reflective of annexation." However, budgetary constraints have meant that the department only received four of those positions in the 2008-2009 budget, and will get no new officer positions in 2009-2010, Anaya said.

The department received a federal stimulus grant last month that will pay the salaries and benefits for eight more officers for three years, he said. "That's really going to help us out," Anaya said.

And while it might be logical to think that the high unemployment rate would bring in more law-enforcement applicants, Anaya said that isn't true. Still, he credited the department's recruiting division for stepping up its efforts, which have led to 13 new hires this year, he said. It takes about a year for a newly hired officer to be fully qualified to be a patrol officer.

But even if the city police department doesn't get all the new personnel it's asking for, the county Sheriff's Office is not going to simply walk away from the newly annexed areas.

The city and county are working on an interim agreement that says the county will maintain its "current level of law enforcement" in the annexed areas for up to three years following annexation, Santa Fe County Attorney Stephen Ross said. The intent of the agreement, he said, is "to provide some buffer so that the city does not ... have to take over all those responsibilities suddenly, so there is gradual transition."

Santa Fe County Sheriff Greg Solano said his agency will back up the city in those areas and handle calls when city officers are not available. He estimated that about 35 percent of his overall calls for service come from the areas to be annexed.

"I absolutely think they need more personnel (for those areas)," Solano said. "There's no doubt about that."

Reporter Julie Ann Grimm contributed to this story.

Contact Jason Auslander at 986-3076 or :jauslander@sfnewmexican.com.


You must login to make comments.
Click on the link below to register for a free account. This is a new system and previous accounts are not transferred to this system. You'll be asked for your name and e-mail address. A confirmation e-mail with a password will be sent to you at the address you provide. Once you've logged into the system, you'll be able to view and contribute comments. Please be respectful to your fellow users and post under your own name. Send questions to webeditor@sfnewmexican.com

Email:
Password:
Remember me
Register here for a free username and password

Comments (24)
What do you think? Add your two cents to the conversation by contributing your view on the news. Please, be respectful to the community and your fellow users and use your real name when posting. Inappropriate postings will be removed and your privileges to comment further might be suspended. If you'd prefer to submit a letter to the editor for possible inclusion in The New Mexican's print edition, visit our submissions page.


(not you? logout)

M.Martinez   (posted on 10/21/2009)
For the people that dont agree that the city needs 48 new positions, this is what is true. The city police department has been working with the same number of officers for about the last 12 years, about 150 sworn personel. These numbers are based on calls for service. Santa Fe has become such a violent city in the last ten years, we have had 6 homicides this year already. the national average is 2 per 100,000 you do the math SF 80,000 6 homicides natl average 2 per 100,000. plus we rank in the top ten per capita for violent assaults, property crime and sexual assaults. it is time that we back our police and fire.
MichaelMichael   (posted on 10/21/2009)
I agree it's a bad time to annex any part of the county. Now, our police department is again pleading with the Santa Fe City Council for help, but as usual the city gives them a deaf! We have one of the worst city council members in the state. We have the finest police Department ever, it's the criminals and city council that makes them look bad!
411   (posted on 10/21/2009)
I agree that this is the wrong time to annex any part of the county. The city needs to beef up on both firefighters and police officers first. In fact the city of Santa Fe has had only five responding fire stations since the 1980's, and im sure that the citys population has doubled if not tripled since then. With the city annexing part of the county it spreads everyone way to thin.
Maria   (posted on 10/21/2009)
Good luck to us all! Last time I had to call the police, they were not sure if I was in the county or the city and when they finally decided where I was, it took two hours for them to get there.
S. Monroe   (posted on 10/21/2009)
The post about now not being the time to annex is right on. See the other related article: "As Santa Fe city officials approach completion of the first of three planned annexations to the city limits, details about costs and responsibilities for a bigger city remain undefined" Throughout public meetings County residents were assured city services would be available, now that annexation is happening we find out there was no plan, and is no plan.
Ambro   (posted on 10/21/2009)
My problem is there`s too many petty cop callers out there. You take care of business the way it should be done. Mano y Mano. You don`t need no stinking interloper to wipe your arse. That`s when trouble arrives. You`re calling cops far too often! Stop It!!!
Orlando Baca   (posted on 10/21/2009)
Why is the City Council even considering annexing more area to the City? Economically, this is definitely not the time. It would be like a family not being able to afford the upkeep on their current home and adding several rooms. It DOES NOT make sense! The City has to live within its means—we can not afford to annex. The FIRST responsibility of the City is to provide for our safety. The City needs to adequately provide for our Police and Fire Departments BEFORE it considers anything else in the budget. The current City Council obviously does not do this. When we look at the --We all know that Santa Fe has been increasing in population. When was the last time we added to the size of our police department? --Santa Fe has also annexed extra area. Again, when was the last time we added to the size of our police department? City Council: IT IS TIME TO FOCUS!
Mindy Mendoza   (posted on 10/21/2009)
Oh how I love men in their uniforms.
OMG   (posted on 10/21/2009)
People here in SF are always complainig about how much crime there is, how little resources we have in order to stop all the burglurys, robbeirs and drug pushers BUT when law enforcement actualy talks about incresing the number of officers needed people are still complaining...What do we want a safe place to live or a crime ridden town?
what is going on   (posted on 10/21/2009)
I guess the SFNM doesn't believe in free speech, unfetted speech and under the new sysytem wants to intimidate those who do not agree with their left wing dogma. Perhaps we should simply stop postting.
ok   (posted on 10/21/2009)
its interesting that years ago to the present that all city officers were required to be county commissioned by the sheriff to help the sheriff and his deputies in the county for any matter no questioned asked, but now that the reciprocal might happen there has to be special agreements in place even though the city is the jurisdiction of the county, incredible
right   (posted on 10/21/2009)
if the on duty officers were actually doing their job while on duty that would be a start - one only needs to look at work product
Joe Friday   (posted on 10/21/2009)
Of course the usual "police bashers" are all over this story. Maybe if there actually were enough cops on the street to do pro-active policing instead of reactive policing, we wouldnt have a burglary problem. Maybe they could be in more neighborhoods more often instead of running from call to call all day long.
David Gunter   (posted on 10/21/2009)
"I have never understood why local police patrol interstates in New Mexico. In other states, this is job for the state police and the state police only." That isn't true everywhere. I grew up in Kansas City, MO and the city cops routinely pulled people over on the interstates. I saw the same thing while living in Chicago for 10 years. Now, funny story in the KC,MO era. A speeder was fined by a KCMO cop on the interstate. He then learned that the KC gov't never explicitly authorized the city police to enforce state speed limits and thus the ticket was thrown out. The local gov't passed the law about a year or two later so this loophole has since been closed.
Santa Fean   (posted on 10/21/2009)
Can't say I told you so! The numbers only mean the number of officers transfers to the diffenrt shifts they work but the price will be in TAXES! City wide.
27 officers   (posted on 10/21/2009)
27 officers for Airport rd alone, gimme a break, does the sheriff dedicate 27 officers to airport rd, no, they dont even have 27 patrol officers in their department,
R Thomas Berner   (posted on 10/21/2009)
I have never understood why local police patrol interstates in New Mexico. In other states, this is job for the state police and the state police only.
Wrong   (posted on 10/21/2009)
Anaya is wrong, the 45 officers that were asked for years ago, which were also greatly exaggerated, were for this anticipated annex the pd always asks for more that needed anticipating that they whill be reduced - the pd also asks for more so thaey can create their speciality units and not for patrol. they use patrol statistics to try to justify numbers and then create specialty units first a big misnomer someone outside the adency needs to prepare this as the pd cant
Truett Collins   (posted on 10/21/2009)
These are most likely the same people that cry if it takes an officer more than two mins to respond to their call when they need help. And I see there are still those here who don't have the courage to post under their real name but have to hide behind a fake.
Diane Rivera   (posted on 10/21/2009)
Airport Road alone needs 27 officers.
numbers   (posted on 10/20/2009)
27 new officers, thats more officers for 13,000 people that a current patrol shift has for the entire population of santa fe (80,000 people) wow Anaya, what are you trying to pull
no way   (posted on 10/20/2009)
wow 48 new positions, for that little area, no way, 28,000 calls for service for 13,000 people that would mean 2 calls for each person, 35 crashes please gimme me a break what was the break down on type of calls the sheriffs does it with far less people
what the   (posted on 10/20/2009)
the police department is using scare tactics - panic- to cause the council to give them more officers - nothing short of coersion
fred flintstone   (posted on 10/20/2009)
City police department officials are confident that the existing number of officers will be able to handle the expected in calls for service in areas to be annexed next month. And yet the police are asking for more new officers than the sheriff department has on duty, yeah right, looks like Anaya is padding figures again nine of those traffic, yeah right someone else needs to do the math, the police cant be trusted with it they are throwing out numbers 4 animal control more supervisors k-9 5 supervisors 1 lieutenant oh please oh wait the money will fall from the sky what the department needs is a review of existing personnel the hours they work and rethinking schedule lengths -- uppermanagement is what is needed - council should look at how many are nver at work, on admin leave or do nothing


advertisement
  • JB Yelsky commented on
  • Ambro A commented on
  • P Orlando Baca commented on
  • Truett Collins commented on
  • Ambro A commented on
  • Joe McNabb commented on
  • Ambro A commented on
  • Doreen Saiz-Adler commented on