Login or register
Court of Appeals decision to be used in case against Fierro's passenger
Jason Auslander | The New Mexican
Posted: Wednesday, October 07, 2009
- 10/8/09
0
Story Tools
Font Size:
Court of Appeals decision to be used in case against Fierro's passenger Facebook
Get FREE Daily Headlines by email!

advertisement
Dressed in red jail clothes, Carlos Fierro appeared in state District Court on Wednesday, just five days after a jury convicted him of vehicular homicide.

This time, however, Fierro was in court to testify at a preliminary hearing held to determine if evidence exists to charge the man sitting next to him when he struck and killed a pedestrian crossing Guadalupe Street in November. But aside from confirming his name, Fierro asserted his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and declined to answer any other questions after conferring with his attorney, Jason Bowles.

Red jail clothes indicate Fierro is being held in the medical section of the jail. Bowles said he didn't know why his client might be housed in the medical section, but said he was "distraught" over the proceedings Monday. Bowles said he had notified the prosecutor in the case that Fierro would assert his Fifth Amendment right and said his client's appearance was unnecessary.

"It was a show," Bowles said.

Former state police Sgt. Alfred Lovato, 38, is charged with the same counts Fierro was charged with — vehicular homicide and causing a fatal accident. The preliminary hearing was not completed Monday, so state District Judge Michael Vigil told lawyers he will schedule the continuation at a date to be determined in late October.

Prosecutor Donna Bevacqua-Young told Vigil she will attempt to prove the charges against Lovato using a recent Court of Appeals decision and the party-to-a-crime statute that's been law in New Mexico since the 1950s.

The Court of Appeals decision upheld the state's ability to charge a passenger in a car driven by a drunken man who plowed into another vehicle and caused two deaths and five injuries. In that case, the passenger encouraged the driver to drive and purchased more alcohol, which the two men drank before the crash.

There must be evidence of "shared conscious wrongdoing," the Court of Appeals said in affirming the case.

At the end of the hearing, Vigil told lawyers he wanted them to present him with briefs before the continuation of the hearing that explored how that standard of shared conscious wrongdoing would affect a voluntarily intoxicated person.

During the hearing Monday, Santa Fe police Detective John Boerth said he interviewed Lovato three days after the crash that killed William Tenorio, 46, of San Felipe Pueblo. He said Lovato's recollections of the night became increasingly scattered the later the hour.

He said Lovato told him he remembered being at WilLee's Blues Club on Guadalupe Street because he recalled seeing the bar's sign while dancing on the dance floor. Boerth said Lovato barely remembered being at Allsup's before the crash, he said. Lovato told him that they were driving down the street just prior to the crash when he heard a loud bang and the next thing he knew, he was covered with glass, including in his mouth, Boerth said.

Several prosecution witnesses toward the end of Monday's hearing testified about a Coors Light beer can found in Fierro's glovebox that was found to have Lovato's DNA on it.

Sam Bregman, Lovato's attorney, said the state came "nowhere near establishing probable cause."

"There's not one shred of evidence to say that my client encouraged Carlos Fierro to drink," he said. "There's no way they'd be prosecuting this if my client wasn't a state police officer at the time."

Lovato, a 17-year veteran of the state police, was a member of Gov. Bill Richardson's security detail and resigned not long after the crash.

Fierro was convicted of vehicular homicide Friday. The jury could not agree on the charge against him of causing a fatal accident.

Bowles filed a motion Monday asking Vigil to grant Fierro a new trial on the vehicular homicide charge. The motion says a new trial should be granted because prosecutors used a law-enforcement-only database to vet jurors and didn't share that information with police, and that a crucial jury instruction was changed after the jury had already deliberated 20 hours.

The District Attorney's Office now must respond to the motion.

Contact Jason Auslander at 986-3076 or :jauslander@sfnewmexican.com.


You must login to make comments.
Click on the link below to register for a free account. This is a new system and previous accounts are not transferred to this system. You'll be asked for your name and e-mail address. A confirmation e-mail with a password will be sent to you at the address you provide. Once you've logged into the system, you'll be able to view and contribute comments. Please be respectful to your fellow users and post under your own name. Send questions to webeditor@sfnewmexican.com

Email:
Password:
Remember me
Register here for a free username and password

Comments (1)
What do you think? Add your two cents to the conversation by contributing your view on the news. Please, be respectful to the community and your fellow users and use your real name when posting. Inappropriate postings will be removed and your privileges to comment further might be suspended. If you'd prefer to submit a letter to the editor for possible inclusion in The New Mexican's print edition, visit our submissions page.


(not you? logout)

Margo Aguilera   (posted on 11/16/2009)
I realize by posting this that I will be hated by many, however, it is something my heart tells me that I must do. I used to be married to Alfred Lovato, and while he is not a perfect man, he is a wonderful father both to my son and his own. I know the man, and I am not defending his drinking that night or any other night, however, some believe, as Carlos Fierros cousin posted on the Santa Fe newspaper that Alfred was somehow more guilty than Alfred. I will tell all of you, that I had many, many ugly arguments with Carlos. He would not leave our family alone. He constantly called Alfred to go out drinking. CONSTANTLY!!!! On too numerous to count occasions Alfred turned him down. He would tell Carlos no. Carlos begged, belittled, and teased Alfred for not going out with him. I want everyone who is judging Alfred to know that he NEVER encouraged Carlos to drink!!!! It was the other way around. I was there, and I fought with Carlos, and even slapped him once for not leaving our family alone. Carlos could not accept that Alfred was married and had left the bar scene behind. His calls were incessant!! I lived this nightmare. I begged Carlos to please leave us alone. THe message here is that everyone thinks that Alfred somehow encouraged Fierro to drink and that is simply not true.
I am not longer married to the man, but I just can't see staying quiet. As for leaving the scene, anyone that knows Alfred knows that when he drinks he passes out. He is not in control. I am certainly not condoning the behavior, however, it is the reality.


advertisement
  • JB Yelsky commented on
  • Ambro A commented on
  • P Orlando Baca commented on
  • Truett Collins commented on
  • Ambro A commented on
  • Joe McNabb commented on
  • Ambro A commented on
  • Doreen Saiz-Adler commented on